When anaphor resolution fails: Partial encoding of anaphoric inferences

Klin, Weingartner, Guzman, and Levine (2004) Levine, Guzman, and Klin (2000) concluded that readers fail to resolve noun phrase anaphors when the antecedent is difficult to retrieve from memory and the inference is not necessary for comprehension. In four experiments we investigated the hypothesis that these inferences were actually partially encoded. Although the results of a lexical decision task demonstrated that readers did not encode a specific lexical item, the results of a reading time measure indicated that they treated the anaphoric noun phrases as co-referential, having reinstated some features from the antecedent episode. We conclude that readers were satisfied with an underspecified representation (Ferreira, Bailey, & Ferraro, 2002; Sanford, 2002); although they knew that an antecedent was present in the passage, they did not devote the resources to fully reinstate it. Further, readers can quickly evaluate the importance of text inputs to comprehension and adjust their attentional resources accordingly.

[1]  Jerome L. Myers,et al.  Accessing the discourse representation during reading , 1998 .

[2]  Albert T. Corbett.  Prenominal adjectives and the disambiguation of anaphoric nouns , 1984 .

[3]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  "Schema Abstraction" in a Multiple-Trace Memory Model , 1986 .

[4]  Kari Fraurud,et al.  Definiteness and the Processing of Noun Phrases in Natural Discourse , 1990, J. Semant..

[5]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  The Time-Course of Constructing Knowledge-Based Inferences for Scientific Texts , 1994 .

[6]  Anthony J. Sanford,et al.  Context, Attention and Depth of Processing During Interpretation , 2002 .

[7]  Franz Schmalhofer,et al.  A Unified Model for Predictive and Bridging Inferences , 2002 .

[8]  Rebecca Fincher-Kiefer,et al.  The Role of Visuospatial Resources in Generating Predictive and Bridging Inferences , 2004 .

[9]  K. Rayner,et al.  Pronoun assignment and semantic integration during reading: eye movements and immediacy of processing , 1983 .

[10]  Thomas A. Schreiber,et al.  The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[11]  E. J. O'Brien,et al.  Sources of coherence in reading , 1995 .

[12]  S A Duffy,et al.  Role of expectations in sentence integration. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  W. Kintsch.  The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a construction-integration model. , 1988, Psychological review.

[14]  A. Sanford,et al.  Depth of processing in language comprehension: not noticing the evidence , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[15]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A Theory of Memory Retrieval. , 1978 .

[16]  Celia M. Klin,et al.  When Anaphor Resolution Fails , 2000 .

[17]  D. Balota,et al.  A word’s meaning affects the decision in lexical decision , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[18]  Stephen B. Barton,et al.  A case study of anomaly detection: Shallow semantic processing and cohesion establishment , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[19]  Edward J. O'Brien,et al.  Situation-Based Context and the Availability of Predictive Inferences , 2001 .

[20]  Gary E. Raney,et al.  Word frequency effects and eye movements during two readings of a text. , 1995, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[21]  Renata Vieira,et al.  A Corpus-based Investigation of Definite Description Use , 1997, CL.

[22]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. , 1984, Psychological review.

[23]  J. M. Golding,et al.  Superordinate goal inferences: Are they automatically generated during comprehension? , 1993 .

[24]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Inferences about predictable events. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[25]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Levels of representation in the interpretation of anaphoric reference and instrument inference , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[26]  G. Murphy,et al.  Discourse model representation of referential and attributive descriptions , 2002 .

[27]  John W. Tukey,et al.  Exploratory Data Analysis. , 1979 .

[28]  M. Mattson,et al.  From words to meaning: A semantic illusion , 1981 .

[29]  M. Gernsbacher.  Mechanisms that improve referential access , 1989, Cognition.

[30]  Celia M. Klin,et al.  When Throwing a Vase Has Multiple Consequences: Minimal Encoding of Predictive Inferencest , 2003 .

[31]  Karl G. D. Bailey,et al.  Good-Enough Representations in Language Comprehension , 2002 .

[32]  W. Montague,et al.  Category norms of verbal items in 56 categories A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms , 1969 .

[33]  Rebecca Fincher-Kiefer,et al.  The role of predictive inferences in situation model construction , 1993 .

[34]  P. Broek,et al.  The role of readers' standards for coherence in the generation of inferences during reading. , 1995 .

[35]  Kristin M Weingartner,et al.  Readers’ sensitivity to linguistic cues in narratives: How salience influences anaphor resolution , 2004, Memory & cognition.