Interpretation of Retrospective BG Measurements

Background: This study investigates blood glucose (BG) measurement interpolation techniques to represent intermediate BG dynamics, and the effect resampling of retrospective BG data has on key glycemic control (GC) performance results. GC protocols in the ICU have varying BG measurement intervals ranging from 0.5 to 4 hours. Sparse data pose problems, particularly in comparing GC performance or model fitting, and thus interpolation is required. Methods: Retrospective data from SPRINT in Christchurch Hospital Intensive Care Unit (ICU) (2005-2007) were used to analyze several interpolation techniques. Piecewise linear, spline, and cubic interpolation functions, which force interpolation through measured data, as well as 1st and 2nd Order B-spline basis functions, are used to identify the interpolated trace. Dense data were thinned to increase sparsity and obtain measurements (Hidden Measurements) for comparison after interpolation. Performance is assessed based on error in capturing hidden measurements. Finally, the effect of minutely versus hourly sampling of the interpolated trace on key GC performance statistics was investigated using retrospective data received from STAR GC in Christchurch Hospital ICU, New Zealand (2011-2015). Results: All of the piecewise functions performed considerably better than the fitted interpolation functions. Linear piecewise interpolation performed the best having a mean RMSE 0.39 mmol/L, within 2 standard deviations of the BG sensor error. Minutely sampled BG resulted in significantly different key GC performance values when compared to raw sparse BG measurements. Conclusion: Linear piecewise interpolation provides the best estimate of intermediate BG dynamics and all analyses comparing GC protocol performance should use minutely linearly interpolated BG data.

[1]  Johan Groeneveld,et al.  A prospective randomised multi-centre controlled trial on tight glucose control by intensive insulin therapy in adult intensive care units: the Glucontrol study , 2009, Intensive Care Medicine.

[2]  Pascale Carayon,et al.  A human factors engineering conceptual framework of nursing workload and patient safety in intensive care units. , 2005, Intensive & critical care nursing.

[3]  Christopher E. Hann,et al.  Simulation and initial proof-of-concept validation of a glycaemic regulation algorithm in critical care , 2008 .

[4]  Roman Hovorka,et al.  Clinical review: Consensus recommendations on measurement of blood glucose and reporting glycemic control in critically ill adults , 2013, Critical Care.

[5]  R. Bergman,et al.  Physiologic evaluation of factors controlling glucose tolerance in man: measurement of insulin sensitivity and beta-cell glucose sensitivity from the response to intravenous glucose. , 1981, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[6]  B. De Moor,et al.  LOGIC-Insulin Algorithm–Guided Versus Nurse-Directed Blood Glucose Control During Critical Illness , 2013, Diabetes Care.

[7]  Dominic S. Lee,et al.  Implementation and evaluation of the SPRINT protocol for tight glycaemic control in critically ill patients: a clinical practice change , 2008, Critical care.

[8]  R S Parker,et al.  Control-relevant modeling in drug delivery. , 2001, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[9]  Christopher E. Hann,et al.  Integral-based identification of a physiological insulin and glucose model on euglycaemic clamp and , 2006 .

[10]  Roman Hovorka,et al.  Efficacy and safety of glucose control with Space GlucoseControl in the medical intensive care unit--an open clinical investigation. , 2012, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[11]  Stephane Heritier,et al.  Intensive versus conventional glucose control in critically ill patients. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  Impact of sensor and measurement timing errors on model-based insulin sensitivity , 2012 .

[13]  M. Malesker,et al.  An efficiency evaluation of protocols for tight glycemic control in intensive care units. , 2007, American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.

[14]  J. Geoffrey Chase,et al.  Impact of Human Factors on Clinical Protocol Performance: A Proposed Assessment Framework and Case Examples , 2008, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[15]  A. Valerio,et al.  A Circulatory Model for the Estimation of Insulin Sensitivity , 1997 .

[16]  Christopher E. Hann,et al.  A physiological Intensive Control Insulin-Nutrition-Glucose (ICING) model validated in critically ill patients , 2011, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[17]  J. Geoffrey Chase,et al.  Stochastic Targeted (STAR) Glycemic Control: Design, Safety, and Performance , 2012, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[18]  S. Crean,et al.  Nurse workload in implementing a tight glycaemic control protocol in a UK hospital: a pilot time-in-motion study. , 2012, Nursing in critical care.

[19]  S Andreassen,et al.  Model predictive glycaemic regulation in critical illness using insulin and nutrition input: a pilot study. , 2006, Medical engineering & physics.

[20]  Balázs Benyó,et al.  Safety, efficacy and clinical generalization of the STAR protocol: a retrospective analysis , 2016, Annals of Intensive Care.

[21]  R. Bellazzi,et al.  The subcutaneous route to insulin-dependent diabetes therapy. , 2001, IEEE engineering in medicine and biology magazine : the quarterly magazine of the Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society.

[22]  C. D. Boor,et al.  On Calculating B-splines , 1972 .

[23]  R. Hovorka,et al.  A simulation model of glucose regulation in the critically ill , 2008, Physiological measurement.