Instant Messaging on Campus: Use and Integration in University Students' Everyday Communication

This article reviews the body of research on the use and role of instant messaging (IM) in campus life, and how IM is a key part of university students' communication. IM is a synchronous form of communication, and its speed, availability information, and support for multiple conversations have made it appealing for young people. With university students, in particular, showing a heavy reliance on IM, researchers have shown great interest in how university students use IM and how it is integrated in their social and academic life. While studies are emerging in various disciplines, no attempt has been made to integrate the disparate findings and approaches. This article synthesizes key findings, provides a map of the literature, and discusses conceptual problems inherent in the study of IM and other information and communication technologies (ICTs) that will help researchers identify key areas of study and opportunities for future investigation.

[1]  Christina M. Desai.  Instant messaging reference: how does it compare? , 2003, Electron. Libr..

[2]  Wendy A. Kellogg,et al.  The adoption and use of BABBLE: A field study of chat in the workplace , 1999, ECSCW.

[3]  Yan Bing Zhang,et al.  Social Interactions Across Media , 2004 .

[4]  Maureen S. Battistella,et al.  Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization , 1991 .

[5]  Stephen D. Perry,et al.  Student Instant Message Use in a Ubiquitous Computing Environment: Effects of Deficient Self-Regulation , 2004 .

[6]  Keith N. Hampton,et al.  Capitalizing on the Net: Social Contact, Civic Engagement, and Sense of Community , 2008 .

[7]  Yifeng Hu,et al.  Friendships through IM: Examining the Relationship between Instant Messaging and Intimacy , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[8]  Tom Gray,et al.  Context and Intent in Call Processing , 2003, FIW.

[9]  M. Castells.  Die Internet-Galaxie , 2001 .

[10]  Lauren Squires,et al.  College students in multimedia relationships: Choosing, using, and fusing communication technologies , 2004 .

[11]  Leysia Palen,et al.  Instant messaging in teen life , 2002, CSCW '02.

[12]  Jody Condit Fagan,et al.  Instant messaging reference: users’ evaluation of library chat , 2002 .

[13]  Christena Nippert-Eng.  Home and Work: Negotiating Boundaries through Everyday Life , 1996 .

[14]  Mary Ann Bell,et al.  Internet and Personal Computing Fads , 2004 .

[15]  Amanda Lenhart,et al.  How Americans Use Instant Messaging , 2004 .

[16]  Gloria E. Jacobs.  Complicating contexts: Issues of methodology in researching the language and literacies of instant messaging , 2004 .

[17]  John R. Barrows,et al.  Internet Use and Collegiate Academic Performance Decrements: Early Findings , 2001 .

[18]  Lynne Schrum,et al.  High-speed Internet use and academic gratifications in the college residence , 2003, Internet High. Educ..

[19]  M. Huysman,et al.  How Does the Internet Affect Social Capital , 2004 .

[20]  Naomi S. Baron,et al.  Tethered or Mobile? Use of Away Messages in Instant Messaging by American College Students , 2005 .

[21]  Jeanette Kindred,et al.  Making connections via instant messenger (IM): Student use of IM to maintain personal relationships , 2004 .

[22]  Jeannette Kindred,et al.  "IM here" Reflections on virtual office hours , 2005, First Monday.

[23]  Kenneth H. Rubin,et al.  Peer Interactions, Relationships, and Groups , 2007 .

[24]  B. Latané.  The psychology of social impact. , 1981 .

[25]  Anabel Quan-Haase,et al.  University Students' Local And Distant Social Ties: Using and integrating modes of communication on campus , 2007 .

[26]  Naomi S. Baron.  See you Online , 2004 .

[27]  E. Zerubavel,et al.  Private time and public time: the temporal structure of social accessibility and professional commitments. , 1979, Social forces; a scientific medium of social study and interpretation.

[28]  C. Lewis,et al.  Instant Messaging, Literacies, and Social Identities , 2005 .

[29]  Rhonda Gibson.  Eats, Shoots & Leaves: The Zero Tolerance Approach to Punctuation , 2004 .

[30]  Wendy A. Kellogg,et al.  Social translucence: an approach to designing systems that support social processes , 2000, TCHI.

[31]  R. Daft,et al.  Information Richness. A New Approach to Managerial Behavior and Organization Design , 1983 .

[32]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Communication Technology and Friendship During the Transition From High School to College , 2006, Computers, Phones, and the Internet.

[33]  Judith Donath,et al.  Public Displays of Connection , 2004 .

[34]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[35]  Steve Jones,et al.  Professors online: The Internet's impact on college faculty , 2005, First Monday.

[36]  James H. Liu,et al.  Distance Matters: Physical Space and Social Impact , 1995 .

[37]  Carl James,et al.  Eats, Shoots and Leaves: The Zero Tolerance Approach to Punctuation Lynne Truss: Accomodating Brocolli in the Cemetary: or why can’t anybody spell?. Vivian James , 2006 .

[38]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  Internet use in the contemporary media environment. , 2001 .

[39]  Barry Wellman,et al.  Instant Messaging for Collaboration: A Case Study of a High-Tech Firm , 2005, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[40]  Steve Jones.  The Internet Goes to College: How Students Are Living in the Future with Today's Technology. , 2002 .

[41]  R. Rice.  Media Appropriateness Using Social Presence Theory to Compare Traditional and New Organizational Media , 1993 .

[42]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[43]  Jeffrey Katzer,et al.  Why Don't They Ask Questions?. , 1972 .

[44]  Manuel Castells,et al.  The Internet Galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, Business, and Society , 2001 .

[45]  E. Goffman.  The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life , 1959 .

[46]  Samir Chatterjee,et al.  Instant messaging and presence technologies for college campuses , 2005, IEEE Network.

[47]  Anabel Quan-Haase,et al.  ‘I'M THERE, BUT I MIGHT NOT WANT TO TALK TO YOU’ , 2008 .

[48]  David C. Yen,et al.  Usefulness of instant messaging among young users: Social vs. work perspective , 2003 .

[49]  Gerald R. Faulhaber.  Network effects and merger analysis: instant messaging and the AOL–Time Warner case , 2002 .

[50]  Louis Leung,et al.  College Student Motives for Chatting on ICQ , 2001, New Media Soc..

[51]  Irina Shklovski,et al.  Teenage Communication in the Instant Messaging Era , 2006, Computers, Phones, and the Internet.

[52]  Andrew J. Flanagin.  IM Online: Instant Messaging Use Among College Students , 2005 .

[53]  Wendy A. Kellogg,et al.  Babble: suporting conversation in the workplace , 1998, SIGG.

[54]  Peter Hernon,et al.  Student Perceptions of Academic Librarians , 1977 .