Effect of Contour Shape of Nervous System Electromagnetic Stimulation Coils on the Induced Electrical Field Distribution

BackgroundElectromagnetic stimulation of the nervous system has the advantage of reduced discomfort in activating nerves. For brain structures stimulation, it has become a clinically accepted modality. Coil designs usually consider factors such as optimization of induced power, focussing, field shape etc. In this study we are attempting to find the effect of the coil contour shape on the electrical field distribution for magnetic stimulation.Method and resultsWe use the maximum of the induced electric field stimulation in the region of interest as the optimization criterion. This choice required the application of the calculus of variation, with the contour perimeter taken as a pre-set condition. Four types of coils are studied and compared: circular, square, triangular and an 'optimally' shaped contour. The latter yields higher values of the induced electrical field in depths up to about 30 mm, but for depths around 100 mm, the circular shape has a slight advantage. The validity of the model results was checked by experimental measurements in a tank with saline solution, where differences of about 12% were found. In view the accuracy limitations of the computational and measurement methods used, such differences are considered acceptable.ConclusionWe applied an optimization approach, using the calculus of variation, which allows to obtain a coil contour shape corresponding to a selected criterion. In this case, the optimal contour showed higher intensities for a longer line along the depth-axis. The method allows modifying the induced field structure and focussing the field to a selected zone or line.

[1]  E. G.v. Lectures on the calculus of variations , 1906 .

[2]  S. Brendle,et al.  Calculus of Variations , 1927, Nature.

[3]  K. Mills,et al.  Magnetic and electrical transcranial brain stimulation: physiological mechanisms and clinical applications. , 1987, Neurosurgery.

[4]  Stuchly Ma,et al.  Applications of time-varying magnetic fields in medicine. , 1990 .

[5]  M A Stuchly Applications of time-varying magnetic fields in medicine. , 1990, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[6]  S. Bandinelli,et al.  Effects of coil design on delivery of focal magnetic stimulation. Technical considerations. , 1990, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[7]  H G Vaughan,et al.  Differentiation of negative event-related potentials in an auditory discrimination task. , 1990, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[8]  L A Geddes,et al.  Guidelines for energy-efficient coils: coils designed for magnetic stimulation of the heart. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[9]  L. Kiers,et al.  Quantitative studies of F responses in Guillain-Barré syndrome and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[10]  F. Okumura,et al.  Effects of strong pulsed magnetic fields on the cardiac activity of an open chest dog , 1994, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  J Cadwell,et al.  In vitro evaluation of a 4-leaf coil design for magnetic stimulation of peripheral nerve. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[12]  Robert H. Anderson,et al.  On Technical Considerations , 1995, Writing Ethnography (Second Edition).

[13]  D. Popović,et al.  A novel electric design for electromagnetic stimulation-the Slinky coil , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  K P Zimmermann,et al.  "Slinky" coils for neuromagnetic stimulation. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[15]  Ian N. Hsiao,et al.  Magnetic coil design considerations for functional magnetic stimulation , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.