Forces on cardiac implantable electronic devices during remote magnetic navigation

BackgroundRemote magnetic navigation systems are used for catheter navigation in cardiac electrophysiological ablation procedures. In this setting, ferromagnetic particles will be moved by changes in the magnetic field. It is unknown to what extent cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) are affected by the magnetic field when using magnetic navigation, and whether these forces may exceed the limit of 5 N that is set forth by German and European norms for implanted electrodes.MethodsA total of 121 rhythm devices were examined in a magnetic field of 0.1 T using the NIOBE II® Magnetic Navigation System (Stereotaxis, St. Louis, USA). Forces acting on the devices were measured with the force measurement tool Futek LRF 400 (Futek Advanced Sensor Technology Inc., Irvine, CA, USA). A standardized protocol of different movements of the magnetic field including all three dimensions was performed and maximal forces on the CIED were assessed.ResultsOut of 121 devices, 78 different pacemakers (54 different model families from 11 manufacturers) and 43 different cardioverter-defibrillators (26 different model families from 6) were examined. The mean force that could be observed was 0.33 ± 0.13 N for pacemakers (range 0.16–1.12 N) and 1.05 ± 0.11 N for cardioverter-defibrillators (range 0.86–1.38 N) when exposed to the magnetic field.ConclusionExposure of pacemakers or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators to a magnetic field of 0.1 T does not result in a force exceeding the regulatory demanded 5 N that could damage the connected leads.

[1]  V. Santinelli,et al.  Robotic magnetic navigation for atrial fibrillation ablation. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  DirkVollmann,et al.  Remote Magnetic Catheter Navigation for Cavotricuspid Isthmus Ablation in Patients With Common-Type Atrial Flutter , 2009 .

[3]  S. Ernst,et al.  Remote-controlled catheter ablation of accessory pathways: results from the magnetic laboratory. , 2006, European heart journal.

[4]  K. Billiar,et al.  Biomechanical investigation of a novel ratcheting arthrodesis nail , 2010, Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research.

[5]  Nora Goldschlager,et al.  Electromagnetic Interference and Implanted Cardiac Devices: The Medical Environment (Part II) , 2012, Clinical cardiology.

[6]  Karthik Ramaswamy,et al.  Remote Magnetic Versus Manual Catheter Navigation for Ablation of Supraventricular Tachycardias: A Randomized, Multicenter Trial , 2008, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[7]  H. Tse,et al.  Initial clinical experience of remote magnetic navigation system for catheter mapping and ablation of supraventricular tachycardias , 2009, Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology.

[8]  G. Hindricks,et al.  Safety of Remote Magnetic Navigation in Patients With Pacemakers and Implanted Cardioverter Defibrillators , 2010, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[9]  B. Lindsay,et al.  Novel, Magnetically Guided Catheter for Endocardial Mapping and Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation , 2002, Circulation.

[10]  Nora Goldschlager,et al.  Electromagnetic Interference and Implanted Cardiac Devices: The Nonmedical Environment (Part I) , 2012, Clinical cardiology.

[11]  C. Gornick,et al.  Feasibility and safety of remote-controlled magnetic navigation for ablation of atrial fibrillation. , 2008, The American journal of cardiology.

[12]  Geoffrey G. Zhang,et al.  Four-dimensional computed tomography scan analysis of tumor and organ motion at varying levels of abdominal compression during stereotactic treatment of lung and liver. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  B. Zrenner,et al.  Mapping of Intraatrial Reentrant Tachycardias by Remote Magnetic Navigation in Patients with d‐Transposition of the Great Arteries After Mustard or Senning Procedure , 2008, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[14]  Vivek Y. Reddy,et al.  Remote Magnetic Navigation to Guide Endocardial and Epicardial Catheter Mapping of Scar-Related Ventricular Tachycardia , 2007, Circulation.

[15]  R. Blindt,et al.  German stereotaxis-guided percutaneous coronary intervention study group: first multicenter real world experience , 2009, Clinical Research in Cardiology.

[16]  J. Burkhardt,et al.  Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Utilizing Robotic Catheter Navigation in Comparison to Manual Navigation and Ablation: Single‐Center Experience , 2009, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[17]  T. Özcan,et al.  Inappropriate shock delivery by implantable cardioverter defibrillator due to electrical leak from bathroom tap , 2010, Clinical Research in Cardiology.

[18]  P. Kane,et al.  Electrocautery-induced pacemaker malfunction during surgery , 1991, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[19]  P. Serruys,et al.  A randomized comparison of the magnetic navigation system versus conventional percutaneous coronary intervention , 2008, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[20]  B. Lindsay,et al.  Use of magnetic navigation to facilitate transcatheter alcohol septal ablation for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. , 2006, The Journal of invasive cardiology.

[21]  Randall J Lee,et al.  Impact of Remote Magnetic Catheter Navigation on Ablation Fluoroscopy and Procedure Time , 2008, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[22]  P Boesiger,et al.  Force and Torque Effects of a 1.5‐Tesla MRI Scanner on Cardiac Pacemakers and ICDs , 2001, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[23]  Giovanni Amoroso,et al.  Use of the Stereotaxis Niobe® magnetic navigation system for percutaneous coronary intervention: Results from 350 consecutive patients , 2008, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[24]  G. Hasenfuss,et al.  Interference of remote magnetic catheter navigation and ablation with implanted devices for pacing and defibrillation. , 2010, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[25]  P. Hoff,et al.  Remote magnetic versus manual catheters: evaluation of ablation effect in atrial fibrillation by myocardial marker levels , 2011, Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology.

[26]  L. Jordaens,et al.  Initial Experience with Catheter Ablation Using Remote Magnetic Navigation in Adults with Complex Congenital Heart Disease and in Small Children , 2009, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[27]  L. Jordaens,et al.  Safety and efficacy of the remote magnetic navigation for ablation of ventricular tachycardias—a systematic review , 2011, Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology.

[28]  Isabel Deisenhofer,et al.  Safety of Implantable Pacemakers and Cardioverter Defibrillators in the Magnetic Field of a Novel Remote Magnetic Navigation System , 2010, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[29]  P. Schauerte,et al.  Initial experience with remote magnetic navigation for left ventricular lead placement , 2009, Acta cardiologica.

[30]  J. Hess,et al.  Mapping of Atrial Tachycardia by Remote Magnetic Navigation in Postoperative Patients With Congenital Heart Disease , 2010, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.