Hydrolysis of CuCl2 in the Cu–Cl thermochemical cycle for hydrogen production: Experimental studies using a spray reactor with an ultrasonic atomizer

The Cu-Cl thermochemical cycle is being developed as a hydrogen production method. Prior proof-of-concept experimental work has shown that the chemistry is viable while preliminary modeling has shown that the efficiency and cost of hydrogen production have the potential to meet DOE's targets. However, the mechanisms of CuCl{sub 2} hydrolysis, an important step in the Cu-Cl cycle, are not fully understood. Although the stoichiometry of the hydrolysis reaction, 2CuCl{sub 2} + H{sub 2}O {leftrightarrow} Cu{sub 2}OCl{sub 2} + 2HCl, indicates a necessary steam-to-CuCl{sub 2} molar ratio of 0.5, a ratio as high as 23 has been typically required to obtain near 100% conversion of the CuCl{sub 2} to the desired products at atmospheric pressure. It is highly desirable to conduct this reaction with less excess steam to improve the process efficiency. Per Le Chatelier's Principle and according to the available equilibrium-based model, the needed amount of steam can be decreased by conducting the hydrolysis reaction at a reduced pressure. In the present work, the experimental setup was modified to allow CuCl{sub 2} hydrolysis in the pressure range of 0.4-1 atm. Chemical and XRD analyses of the product compositions revealed the optimal steam-to-CuCl{sub 2} molar ratio to be 20-23 at 1more » atm pressure. The experiments at 0.4 atm and 0.7 atm showed that it is possible to lower the steam-to-CuCl{sub 2} molar ratio to 15, while still obtaining good yields of the desired products. An important effect of running the reaction at reduced pressure is the significant decrease of CuCl concentration in the solid products, which was not predicted by prior modeling. Possible explanations based on kinetics and residence times are suggested.« less

[1]  Greg F. Naterer,et al.  Comparison of different copper–chlorine thermochemical cycles for hydrogen production , 2009 .

[2]  R. Allen,et al.  A figure of merit assessment of the routes to hydrogen , 2005 .

[3]  Michele A. Lewis,et al.  The evaluation of alternative thermochemical cycles – Part II: The down-selection process , 2009 .

[4]  Alan W. Weimer,et al.  Likely near-term solar-thermal water splitting technologies , 2004 .

[5]  R. Allen,et al.  Nuclear heat for hydrogen production: Coupling a very high/high temperature reactor to a hydrogen production plant , 2009 .

[6]  Michele A. Lewis,et al.  Evaluation of alternative thermochemical cycles-part III further development of the Cu-Cl cycle. , 2009 .

[7]  Michele A. Lewis,et al.  Evaluation of alternative thermochemical cycles - Part I the methodology. , 2009 .

[8]  Michele A. Lewis,et al.  Hydrogen production by the Cu–Cl thermochemical cycle: Investigation of the key step of hydrolysing CuCl2 to Cu2OCl2 and HCl using a spray reactor , 2010 .

[9]  Robert Palumbo,et al.  Solar Thermochemical Process Technology , 2003 .

[10]  Atherton Seidell,et al.  Solubilities: inorganic and metal-organic compounds : a compilation of solubility data from the periodical literature , 1958 .

[11]  A. Steinfeld Solar thermochemical production of hydrogen--a review , 2005 .

[12]  Tatsuya Kodama,et al.  Thermochemical cycles for high-temperature solar hydrogen production. , 2007 .

[13]  T. Nejat Veziroglu,et al.  “Green” path from fossil-based to hydrogen economy: An overview of carbon-neutral technologies , 2008 .

[14]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  Recent Canadian advances in nuclear-based hydrogen production and the thermochemical Cu–Cl cycle , 2009 .

[15]  Edgar Peek Chloride Pyrohydrolysis, lixiviant regeneration and metal separation , 1996 .