Different Neural Mechanisms within Occipitotemporal Cortex Underlie Repetition Suppression across Same and Different-Size Faces

Repetition suppression (RS) (or functional magnetic resonance imaging adaptation) refers to the reduction in blood oxygen level–dependent signal following repeated presentation of a stimulus. RS is frequently used to investigate the role of face-selective regions in human visual cortex and is commonly thought to be a “localized” effect, reflecting fatigue of a neuronal population representing a given stimulus. In contrast, predictive coding theories characterize RS as a consequence of “top-down” changes in between-region modulation. Differentiating between these accounts is crucial for the correct interpretation of RS effects in the face-processing network. Here, dynamic causal modeling revealed that different mechanisms underlie different forms of RS to faces in occipitotemporal cortex. For both familiar and unfamiliar faces, repetition of identical face images (same size) was associated with changes in “forward” connectivity between the occipital face area (OFA) and the fusiform face area (FFA) (OFA-to-FFA). In contrast, RS across image size was characterized by altered “backward” connectivity (FFA-to-OFA). In addition, evidence was higher for models in which information projected directly into both OFA and FFA, challenging the role of OFA as the input stage of the face-processing network. These findings suggest “size-invariant” RS to faces is a consequence of interactions between regions rather than being a localized effect.

[1]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modeling , 2010, Scholarpedia.

[2]  J. Haxby,et al.  The distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[3]  Sheng He,et al.  Anatomical correlates of the functional organization in the human occipitotemporal cortex. , 2006, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[4]  Peter van Gelderen,et al.  Improved BOLD detection in the medial temporal region using parallel imaging and voxel volume reduction , 2006, NeuroImage.

[5]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Ten simple rules for dynamic causal modeling , 2010, NeuroImage.

[6]  A. Ishai,et al.  Effective connectivity within the distributed cortical network for face perception. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[7]  Hyeonjoon Moon,et al.  The FERET evaluation methodology for face-recognition algorithms , 1997, Proceedings of IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[8]  R. Dolan,et al.  fMRI-adaptation reveals dissociable neural representations of identity and expression in face perception. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  Timothy J. Andrews,et al.  Differential sensitivity for viewpoint between familiar and unfamiliar faces in human visual cortex , 2008, NeuroImage.

[10]  Johan D. Carlin,et al.  A Head View-Invariant Representation of Gaze Direction in Anterior Superior Temporal Sulcus , 2011, Current Biology.

[11]  H. Wilson,et al.  fMRI evidence for the neural representation of faces , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A theory of cortical responses , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  R. Goebel,et al.  Individual faces elicit distinct response patterns in human anterior temporal cortex , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  F. Fang,et al.  Duration-dependent FMRI adaptation and distributed viewer-centered face representation in human visual cortex. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[16]  B. Rossion,et al.  Recovery from adaptation to facial identity is larger for upright than inverted faces in the human occipito-temporal cortex , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[17]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling , 2003, NeuroImage.

[18]  A. Calder Does Facial Identity and Facial Expression Recognition Involve Separate Visual Routes , 2011 .

[19]  T. Shallice,et al.  Neuroimaging evidence for dissociable forms of repetition priming. , 2000, Science.

[20]  R. Dolan,et al.  Separate Coding of Different Gaze Directions in the Superior Temporal Sulcus and Inferior Parietal Lobule , 2007, Current Biology.

[21]  R. Goebel,et al.  Cerebral Cortex doi:10.1093/cercor/bhj005 Impaired Face Discrimination in Acquired Prosopagnosia Is Associated with Abnormal Response to Individual Faces in the Right Middle Fusiform Gyrus , 2005 .

[22]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Constraining the cortical face network by neuroimaging studies of acquired prosopagnosia , 2008, NeuroImage.

[23]  R. Henson Neuroimaging studies of priming , 2003, Progress in Neurobiology.

[24]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The priming method: imaging unconscious repetition priming reveals an abstract representation of number in the parietal lobes. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[25]  D. J. Felleman,et al.  Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. , 1991, Cerebral cortex.

[26]  M. Seghier,et al.  A network of occipito-temporal face-sensitive areas besides the right middle fusiform gyrus is necessary for normal face processing. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[27]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Comparing Families of Dynamic Causal Models , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[28]  Rufin Vogels,et al.  Stimulus repetition probability does not affect repetition suppression in macaque inferior temporal cortex. , 2011, Cerebral cortex.

[29]  Vanessa M. Johnen,et al.  Human Scalp Electroencephalography Reveals that Repetition Suppression Varies with Expectation , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[30]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  fMR-adaptation: a tool for studying the functional properties of human cortical neurons. , 2001, Acta psychologica.

[31]  Jean-Luc Anton,et al.  Region of interest analysis using an SPM toolbox , 2010 .

[32]  J. Tanaka,et al.  The NimStim set of facial expressions: Judgments from untrained research participants , 2009, Psychiatry Research.

[33]  Gilles Pourtois,et al.  Portraits or People? Distinct Representations of Face Identity in the Human Visual Cortex , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[34]  P. Downing,et al.  The neural basis of visual body perception , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[35]  Morris Moscovitch,et al.  Face Processing Changes in Normal Aging Revealed by fMRI Adaptation , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[36]  G. Kovács,et al.  Neural correlates of high-level adaptation-related aftereffects. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[37]  Timothy J. Andrews,et al.  Distinct representations for facial identity and changeable aspects of faces in the human temporal lobe , 2004, NeuroImage.

[38]  A. Young,et al.  Understanding the recognition of facial identity and facial expression , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[39]  Johan D. Carlin,et al.  Direction-Sensitive Codes for Observed Head Turns in Human Superior Temporal Sulcus , 2011, Cerebral cortex.

[40]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Hemispheric Asymmetries for Whole-Based and Part-Based Face Processing in the Human Fusiform Gyrus , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[41]  Timothy J. Andrews,et al.  Internal and External Features of the Face Are Represented Holistically in Face-Selective Regions of Visual Cortex , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[42]  Luca Passamonti,et al.  Changes in “Top-Down” Connectivity Underlie Repetition Suppression in the Ventral Visual Pathway , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[43]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  The roles of “face” and “non-face” areas during individual face perception: Evidence by fMRI adaptation in a brain-damaged prosopagnosic patient , 2008, NeuroImage.

[44]  Jim M. Monti,et al.  Neural repetition suppression reflects fulfilled perceptual expectations , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[45]  Frederic Dick,et al.  Developmental Changes in Effective Connectivity in the Emerging Core Face Network , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[46]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[47]  R. Tootell,et al.  An anterior temporal face patch in human cortex, predicted by macaque maps , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[48]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Bayesian model selection for group studies , 2009, NeuroImage.

[49]  Jie Tian,et al.  Effective connectivities of cortical regions for top-down face processing: A Dynamic Causal Modeling study , 2010, Brain Research.

[50]  Mark W. Greenlee,et al.  Position-specific and position-invariant face aftereffects reflect the adaptation of different cortical areas , 2008, NeuroImage.

[51]  M. Goodale,et al.  Abnormal face identity coding in the middle fusiform gyrus of two brain-damaged prosopagnosic patients , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[52]  R. Henson,et al.  Electrophysiological and haemodynamic correlates of face perception, recognition and priming. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[53]  Doris Y. Tsao,et al.  Comparing face patch systems in macaques and humans , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[54]  Kenneth F. Valyear,et al.  The fusiform face area is not sufficient for face recognition: Evidence from a patient with dense prosopagnosia and no occipital face area , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[55]  G. Rhodes Lateralized processes in face recognition. , 1985, British journal of psychology.

[56]  A. Treves,et al.  Morphing Marilyn into Maggie dissociates physical and identity face representations in the brain , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.