Design for Inspectability

This chapter develops the ideas underlying Design for Inspectability, by considering in more detail the manufacturing climate, by introducing the human operator as a third component alongside product and process, and by defining a Design for Inspectability procedure. We show, with an example of this procedure, how product, process and person can be designed together to improve inspectability.

[1]  Stephan A. Konz,et al.  Work Design: Industrial Ergonomics , 1983 .

[2]  Gultekin Özsoyoglu,et al.  Advances in agile manufacturing , 1997, Proceedings of International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[3]  Godwin J. Udo,et al.  Advanced manufacturing technologies: Determinants of implementation success , 1996 .

[4]  C G Drury,et al.  Design and evaluation of an inspection training programme. , 1993, Applied ergonomics.

[5]  Colin G. Drury,et al.  A Comparison of Blink Aided and Manual Inspection Using Laboratory and Plant Subjects , 1984 .

[6]  P. R. Roberge.  A knowledge-based shell for selecting a nondestructive evaluation technique , 1995 .

[7]  Colin G. Drury,et al.  Ergonomics practice in manufacturing , 1991 .

[8]  長町 三生,et al.  Design for manufacturability : a systems approach to concurrent engineering and ergonomics , 1992 .

[9]  William W. Luggen.  Flexible manufacturing cells and systems , 1991 .

[10]  Waldemar Karwowski,et al.  Design of work and development of personnel in advanced manufacturing , 1994 .

[11]  Tung-Hsu Hou,et al.  An empirical study of hybrid inspection systems and allocation of inspection functions , 1993 .

[12]  Joseph A. Heim,et al.  Manufacturing systems : foundations of world-class practice , 1992 .

[13]  Colin G. Drury,et al.  The speed-accuracy trade-off in industry , 1994 .

[14]  Colin G. Drury,et al.  Task Analysis of Aircraft Inspection Activities: Methods and Findings , 1990 .

[15]  Sven Åke Hörte,et al.  Implementation of advanced manufacturing technologies: Swedish FMS experiences , 1991 .