The Longitudinal Young’s Modulus of Cortical Bone in the Midshaft of Human Femur and its Correlation with CT Scanning Data

This study was concerned with establishing the regional variations in the magnitude of the longitudinal Young’s modulus of the cortical bone in the femoral midshaft and with investigating whether a relationship existed between the Young’s modulus of bone and the CT number. Were such a relationship to exist this would provide a noninvasive method of assessing the quality of bone in the regions of fixation of implants to bone. The data would be of considerable aid to designers of implant stems to withstand the stresses arising at its interface with the bone. Five pairs of fresh frozen human femora were used. Several beam-shaped small specimens were methodically harvested from each pair and were used to measure the longitudinal modulus adopting the three-point bending test, which was carried out with a specially constructed and validated apparatus. CT scans of the bone were obtained, prior to harvesting the specimens, and the CT number was measured at locations corresponding with the specimen sites. The results indicate that in the femoral midshaft the cortical bone has an average Young’s modulus value of 18600 ± 1900 MPa. This agrees well with data obtained by other researchers using different experimental methods. Statistical analyses revealed no regional variations in the value of the longitudinal modulus of the bone. No correlation was found between the bone modulus and the CT number. Thus a noninvasive method for establishing the bone properties still remains a challenge.

[1]  E. Schneider,et al.  Estimation of mechanical properties of cortical bone by computed tomography , 1991, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[2]  Hj Norussis,et al.  SPSS for Windows , 1993 .

[3]  D. Raftopoulos,et al.  Determination of mechanical properties of human femoral cortical bone by the Hopkinson bar stress technique. , 1990, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  W. Hayes,et al.  Biomechanical properties of the proximal femur determined in vitro by single‐energy quantitative computed tomography , 1989, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[5]  S. Goldstein,et al.  Evaluation of orthogonal mechanical properties and density of human trabecular bone from the major metaphyseal regions with materials testing and computed tomography , 1991, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[6]  S F Lipson,et al.  The relationship between elastic properties and microstructure of bovine cortical bone. , 1984, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  R. B. Ashman,et al.  Relations of mechanical properties to density and CT numbers in human bone. , 1995, Medical engineering & physics.

[8]  X. Chen,et al.  Technical note: CT determination of the mineral density of dry bone specimens using the dipotassium phosphate phantom. , 1997, American journal of physical anthropology.

[9]  M Martens,et al.  Aging of bone tissue: mechanical properties. , 1976, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  G. Pharr,et al.  The elastic properties of trabecular and cortical bone tissues are similar: results from two microscopic measurement techniques. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  A. Gjelsvik,et al.  Mechanical properties of hydrated cortical bone. , 1974, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  J A McGeough,et al.  Age-related changes in the tensile properties of cortical bone. The relative importance of changes in porosity, mineralization, and microstructure. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[13]  A. Alho,et al.  Bending strength of the femur in relation to non-invasive bone mineral assessment. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  W. Bonfield,et al.  Anisotropy of the Young's modulus of bone , 1977, Nature.

[15]  E. F. Byars,et al.  EFFECT OF EMBALMING ON THE MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF BEEF BONE. , 1964, Journal of applied physiology.

[16]  J. Zanchetta,et al.  Mechanical validation of a tomographic (pQCT) index for noninvasive estimation of rat femur bending strength. , 1996, Bone.

[17]  A. H. Burstein,et al.  Response to comments on the elastic and ultimate properties of compact bone tissue , 1976 .

[18]  A. Burstein,et al.  The elastic and ultimate properties of compact bone tissue. , 1975, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  W C Van Buskirk,et al.  A continuous wave technique for the measurement of the elastic properties of cortical bone. , 1984, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  B B Seedhom,et al.  Quality assessment of the cortical bone of the human mandible. , 2003, Bone.

[21]  T. Hangartner,et al.  Evaluation of cortical bone by computed tomography , 1996, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[22]  Marija J. Norusis,et al.  SPSS for Windows, Advanced Statistics, release 6.0 , 1993 .

[23]  H K Genant,et al.  Noninvasive assessment of bone density and structure using computed tomography and magnetic resonance. , 1998, Bone.

[24]  S M Bentzen,et al.  Mechanical strength of tibial trabecular bone evaluated by X-ray computed tomography. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.

[25]  A. Burstein,et al.  The elastic modulus for bone. , 1974, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  T. Keller,et al.  Young's modulus, bending strength, and tissue physical properties of human compact bone , 1990, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.