Multimodal signals enhance decision making in foraging bumble-bees

Multimodal signals are common in nature and have recently attracted considerable attention. Despite this interest, their function is not well understood. We test the hypothesis that multimodal signals improve decision making in receivers by influencing the speed and the accuracy of their decisions. We trained bumble-bees (Bombus impatiens) to discriminate between artificial flowers that differed either in one modality, visual (specifically, shape) or olfactory, or in two modalities, visual plus olfactory. Bees trained on multimodal flowers learned the rewarding flowers faster than those trained on flowers that differed only in the visual modality and, in extinction trials, visited the previously rewarded flowers at a higher rate than bees trained on unimodal flowers. Overall, bees showed a speed–accuracy trade-off; bees that made slower decisions achieved higher accuracy levels. Foraging on multimodal flowers did not affect the slope of the speed–accuracy relationship, but resulted in a higher intercept, indicating that multimodal signals were associated with consistently higher accuracy across range of decision speeds. Our results suggest that bees make more effective decisions when flowers signal in more than one modality, and confirm the importance of studying signal components together rather than separately.

[1]  Andreas T. Schaefer,et al.  Maintaining Accuracy at the Expense of Speed Stimulus Similarity Defines Odor Discrimination Time in Mice , 2004, Neuron.

[2]  R. Raguso Cognitive Ecology of Pollination: Floral scent, olfaction, and scent-driven foraging behavior , 2001 .

[3]  E. Odell,et al.  Bumblebee Foraging Responses to Variation in Floral Scent and Color in Snapdragons (Antirrhinum: Scrophulariaceae) , 1999 .

[4]  E. Hebets Attention-altering Signal Interactions in the Multimodal Courtship Display of the Wolf Spider Schizocosa Uetzi , 2004 .

[5]  Mark A. Willis,et al.  Synergy between visual and olfactory cues in nectar feeding by naı̈ve hawkmoths, Manduca sexta , 2002, Animal Behaviour.

[6]  T. Seeley,et al.  Modeling and analysis of nest-site selection by honeybee swarms: the speed and accuracy trade-off , 2005, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[7]  B. Stein Neural mechanisms for synthesizing sensory information and producing adaptive behaviors , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  R. Menzel,et al.  Differential parallel processing of olfactory information in the honeybee, Apis mellifera L. , 2002, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[9]  T. Guilford,et al.  Novelty effects in a multimodal warning signal , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[10]  D. Papaj,et al.  Complex signal function: developing a framework of testable hypotheses , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[11]  B. Hölldobler,et al.  Multimodal signals in ant communication , 1999, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[12]  Anna Dornhaus,et al.  Speed versus accuracy in collective decision making , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  D. Small Crossmodal integration – insights from the chemical senses , 2004, Trends in Neurosciences.

[14]  M. Willis,et al.  Synergy between visual and olfactory cues in nectar feeding by wild hawkmoths, Manduca sexta , 2005, Animal Behaviour.

[15]  A. Gumbert,et al.  The combined effect of color and odor on flower choice behavior of bumble bees in flower mimicry systems , 2001 .

[16]  Sarah R Partan,et al.  Issues in the Classification of Multimodal Communication Signals , 2005, The American Naturalist.

[17]  M. Shadlen,et al.  Response of Neurons in the Lateral Intraparietal Area during a Combined Visual Discrimination Reaction Time Task , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  R. Grieve When will enough be enough? , 1993, Nature.

[19]  T. Keasar,et al.  Overnight memory retention of foraging skills by bumblebees is imperfect , 1996, Animal Behaviour.

[20]  Hisashi Kobayashi,et al.  Modeling and analysis , 1978 .

[21]  K. Honda,et al.  Priority of color over scent during flower visitation by adult Vanessa indica butterflies , 2005, Oecologia.

[22]  L. Chittka,et al.  Bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) sacrifice foraging speed to solve difficult colour discrimination tasks , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[23]  L. Chittka,et al.  Visual search and the importance of time in complex decision making by bees , 2007, Arthropod-Plant Interactions.

[24]  Lars Chittka,et al.  Sensorimotor learning in bumblebees: long-term retention and reversal training , 1998 .

[25]  M. Shadlen,et al.  The effect of stimulus strength on the speed and accuracy of a perceptual decision. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[26]  A. Gelperin,et al.  Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff in Olfaction , 2006, Neuron.

[27]  Adam Kepecs,et al.  Seeing at a glance, smelling in a whiff: rapid forms of perceptual decision making , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[28]  A. Kelber,et al.  The relative importance of olfaction and vision in a diurnal and a nocturnal hawkmoth , 2006, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[29]  G. Uetz,et al.  Consequences of complex signaling: predator detection of multimodal cues , 2007 .

[30]  G. Calvert Crossmodal processing in the human brain: insights from functional neuroimaging studies. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[31]  T. Guilford,et al.  Receiver psychology and the evolution of animal signals , 1991, Animal Behaviour.

[32]  Issues in Classification , 1978 .

[33]  D. Howie Speed and accuracy , 1956 .

[34]  Robin D. Thomas Separability and Independence of Dimensions within the Same–Different Judgment Task , 1996 .

[35]  C. Rowe Receiver psychology and the evolution of multicomponent signals , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[36]  B. Slotnick Odor-sampling time of mice under different conditions. , 2007, Chemical senses.

[37]  A. Dornhaus,et al.  Psychophysics: Bees trade off foraging speed for accuracy , 2003, Nature.

[38]  Z. Mainen,et al.  Speed and accuracy of olfactory discrimination in the rat , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[39]  M. Lehrer,et al.  Generalization of convex shapes by bees: what are shapes made of? , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.