The study reviews the politics underlying the 2004 referendum in Hungary on whether the country should offer extraterritorial, non-resident citizenship to ethnic Hungarians living in the neighboring states of Romania, Slovakia, Serbia-Montenegro and the Ukraine. The study argues that the issue of dual citizenship for ethnic minorities and kin-states in Central and Eastern Europe is quite distinct from the issue of dual citizenship in West European immigration countries. Transborder ethnic relatives make up large proportions of some of the contiguous countries with whom Hungary has a long history of border disputes which is why the Hungarian reform initiative touched upon sensitive issues connected to the sovereignty of these states. In addition, the large size of the non-resident Hungarian population means that their potential Hungarian citizenship would have serious consequences for the Hungarian welfare state, and the determination of the political future of Hungary, where even much smaller numbers of voting non-residents might swing the vote. The article outlines the arguments that were made in favor of the reform by the political right and those against the reform by the left. It examines the initiative from the European Union's perspective and compares the Hungarian case to cases of dual citizenship in other countries of Europe. The article also raises questions about the long-term implications of this form of dual citizenship for the “re-ethnicization” of citizenship.
[1]
C. Joppke.
Selecting by Origin: Ethnic Migration in the Liberal State
,
2005
.
[2]
J. Goldgeier,et al.
Nationalist Strategies and European Integration
,
2004,
Perspectives on Politics.
[3]
Jan Kis.
The Status Law : Hungary at the Crossroads 1 János Kis
,
2004
.
[4]
Constantin Iordachi.
Dual Citizenship and Policies toward Kin minorities in East-Central Europe: A Comparison between Hungary, Romania and the Republic of Moldova
,
2004
.
[5]
Nándor Bárdi.
"A mumusok és a kék madár" Mi történt? Mirõl beszél(t)ünk?
,
2004
.
[6]
C. Joppke.
Citizenship between De- and Re-Ethnicization
,
2003,
European Journal of Sociology.
[7]
Michael Stewart.
The Hungarian Status Law: A New European Form of Transnational Politics?
,
2003
.
[8]
A. Ostrow.
Dual Resident Voting: Traditional Disenfranchisement and Prospects for Change
,
2002
.
[9]
M. Vink.
The Limited Europeanization of Domestic Citizenship Policy: Evidence from the Netherlands
,
2001
.
[10]
Rogers Brubaker.
Accidental Diasporas and External "Homelands" in Central and Eastern Europe: Past and Present. IHS Political Science Series 71, October 2000.
,
2000
.
[11]
Alick Buchanan-Smith.
Speech to Parliament
,
1998,
A Diverse Assembly.
[12]
K. Verdery.
Citizenship and Property in Eastern Europe
,
1997
.