[The efficacy of direct vision internal urethrotomy for male urethral stricture].

OBJECTIVE Direct vision internal urethrotomy (DVIU) has been considered to be a low invasive and widely used therapeutic modality for male urethral stricture. However, its efficacy is still controversial. We herein evaluated the efficacy of DVIU for male urethral stricture. PATIENTS AND METHODS Nineteen patients 27 to 78 years old (median age = 59) underwent DVIU for urethral strictures at our hospital were included in this study. Strictures were at bulbar urethra in 17 patients, membranous urethra in 1 patient, and pendulous urethra in 1 patient. The stricture lengths estimated on retrograde urethrography were less than 1 cm in 13 patients, 1-2 cm in 2 patients, and more than 2 cm in 4 patients. The etiology of stricture was straddle injury in 7 patients, post transurethral surgery in 7 patients, pelvic fracture in 1 patient, and unknown in 4 patients. The operation was done by cold knife incision using guidewire. The duration of postoperative urethral catheterization was 5 to 35 days (mean 12.8 days). Follow up duration ranged from 1 month to 139 months (mean 48.2 months). The definition of postoperative re-stricture was the confirmation of re-stricture on retrograde urethrography or deterioration of symptom. RESULTS While no severe complication was observed, postoperative re-stricture was seen in 13 patients. Stricture-free rates at 3 months, 6 months, and 5 years after the first DVIU were 44.4%, 38.1%, 20.3% respectively. Although second DVIU was done for 7 patients with re-stricture, six patients resulted in failure. Stricture-free rates at 3 months, 6 months, and 5 years after the second DVIU were 42.2%, 28.6%, 14.3% respectively. Though the third DVIU was done for two of them, they were unable to void just immediately after the removal of urethral catheters. Stricture-free rate in stricture less than 1 cm was higher than that in 1 cm or longer, though it did not reach significant difference (p = 0.1813). CONCLUSION The efficacy of DVIU is lesser than we expected. DVIU seems to be excessively applied to male urethral strictures and should not be performed for long and recurrent urethral stricture.

[1]  J. Bosch,et al.  Management of adult anterior urethral stricture disease: nationwide survey among urologists in the Netherlands. , 2011, European urology.

[2]  A. Mundy,et al.  Urethral strictures , 2011, BJU international.

[3]  R. Santucci,et al.  Urethrotomy has a much lower success rate than previously reported. , 2010, The Journal of urology.

[4]  B. Breyer,et al.  Multivariate analysis of risk factors for long-term urethroplasty outcome. , 2010, The Journal of urology.

[5]  S. Brandes,et al.  Adult anterior urethral strictures: a national practice patterns survey of board certified urologists in the United States. , 2007, The Journal of urology.

[6]  A. Nathens,et al.  What is the most cost-effective treatment for 1 to 2-cm bulbar urethral strictures: societal approach using decision analysis. , 2006, Urology.

[7]  C. Heyns,et al.  What is the place of internal urethrotomy in the treatment of urethral stricture disease? , 2005, Nature Clinical Practice Urology.

[8]  G. Jordan,et al.  Primary urethral reconstruction: the cost minimized approach to the bulbous urethral stricture. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[9]  D. Nicol,et al.  Repeat urethrotomy and dilation for the treatment of urethral stricture are neither clinically effective nor cost-effective. , 2004, The Journal of urology.

[10]  V. Pansadoro,et al.  Internal urethrotomy in the management of anterior urethral strictures: long-term followup. , 1996, The Journal of urology.

[11]  A. Holm-Nielsen,et al.  Direct vision internal urethrotomy. A critical review of 365 operations. , 1984, British journal of urology.

[12]  F. Moesgaard,et al.  Strictures of the male urethra treated by the Otis method. , 1983, The Journal of urology.

[13]  L. B. Gibod,et al.  Endoscopic Urethrotomy: Does it Live Up to its Promises? , 1982 .