Mechanisms underlying the differential sensitivity to a1‐adrenoceptor activation in the bisected rat vas deferens

1 The factors underlying the different responsiveness of the prostatic and epididymal portions of rat vas deferens to α1‐adrenoceptor stimulation were investigated. 2 The α1‐adrenoceptors in membranes of both halves of rat vas deferens were labelled with [3H]‐prazosin and the affinities of agonists and antagonists for these receptors were determined. In saturation studies, the Bmax and KD values for [3H]‐prazosin in membranes of both portions were the same. 3 In competition studies, the inhibition curves for phentolamine were biphasic and consistent with the presence of both α1a‐ and α1b‐adrenoceptor subtypes. The proportions of binding sites with high and low affinity for phentolamine in both halves of rat vas deferens were similar and in good agreement with the percentages of binding sites for WB‐4101 and phentolamine previously reported in the whole rat vas deferens. 4 The phenylethylamines displaced [3H]‐prazosin with a shallow inhibition curve. The data are compatible with the assumption of two affinity states for the binding sites. For the imidazoline compounds no such distinct affinity states could be demonstrated. 5 The affinity for, and the relative intrinsic efficacy on postsynaptic α1‐adrenoceptors of both portions of rat vas deferens were studied for noradrenaline, phenylephrine and methoxamine by irreversible inactivation of the α1‐adrenoceptors by phenoxybenzamine. The parameters for partial agonists were determined by comparing the responses to the partial agonist to those of a full agonist in the same tissue. Homogeneous estimates of the equilibrium dissociation constants (Ka) were obtained, indicating that these agonists bind to the receptors of both tissues in an identical manner. Further, estimation of the intrinsic efficacy of agonists relative to noradrenaline, indicated no differences between the two halves of rat vas deferens. 6 Ka values for agonist activation of the functional α1‐adrenoceptors were compared with KI values for agonist inhibition of specific [3H]‐prazosin binding. The Ka values were well correlated with the low affinity KI values for phenylethylamines in both portions of rat vas deferens, suggesting that the initial event in signal transduction by α1‐adrenoceptors is the binding to the low affinity state of the receptor. 7 There was a non‐linear relationship between response and receptor occupancy in both halves of rat vas deferens but the occupancy‐response coupling was more efficient in the epididymal than in the prostatic portion. This fact may account for the differences observed in the functional responses.

[1]  J. J. Beckeringh,et al.  α1‐Adrenoceptors: the ability of various agonists and antagonists to discriminate between two distinct [3H]prazosin binding sites , 1989, The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology.

[2]  J. Sallés,et al.  Effects of St−587 on the α‐adrenoceptors in the Bisected Rat Vas Deferens , 1989 .

[3]  G. Gross,et al.  Subclassification of α1‐adrenoceptor recognition sites by urapidil derivatives and other selective antagonists , 1989, British journal of pharmacology.

[4]  M. Martí,et al.  Relationship between α-adrenoceptor occupancy and contractile response in rat vas deferens. Experimental and theoretical analysis☆ , 1988 .

[5]  G. Gross,et al.  α1-Adrenoceptors of rat myocardium: Comparison of agonist binding and positive inotropic response , 1988, Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology.

[6]  P. Ernsberger,et al.  Modulation of agonist and antagonist interactions at kidney alpha 1-adrenoceptors by nucleotides and metal ions. , 1987, European journal of pharmacology.

[7]  P. Abel,et al.  α1Adrenoceptor subtypes linked to different mechanisms for increasing intracellular Ca2+ in smooth muscle , 1987, Nature.

[8]  I. Creese,et al.  Characterization of alpha 1-adrenergic receptor subtypes in rat brain: a reevaluation of [3H]WB4104 and [3H]prazosin binding. , 1986, Molecular pharmacology.

[9]  J. McGrath,et al.  α‐Adrenoceptor antagonism by apoyohimbine and some observations on the pharmacology of α‐adrenoceptors in the rat anococcygeus and vas deferens , 1984 .

[10]  P. Abel,et al.  "Spare" alpha 1-adrenergic receptors and the potency of agonists in rat vas deferens. , 1984, Molecular pharmacology.

[11]  G A McPherson,et al.  A practical computer-based approach to the analysis of radioligand binding experiments. , 1983, Computer programs in biomedicine.

[12]  D. A. Brown,et al.  Separation of adrenergic and non‐adrenergic contractions to field stimulation in the rat vas deferens , 1983, British journal of pharmacology.

[13]  P. Abel,et al.  Occupancy of alpha 1-adrenergic receptors and contraction of rat vas deferens. , 1983, Molecular pharmacology.

[14]  Moore Pk,et al.  Pre-synaptic and post-synaptic effects of xylazine and naphazoline on the bisected rat vas deferens. , 1982, Archives internationales de pharmacodynamie et de therapie.

[15]  P. Moore,et al.  Pre-synaptic and post-synaptic effects of xylazine and naphazoline on the bisected rat vas deferens. , 1982, Archives internationales de pharmacodynamie et de therapie.

[16]  D Rodbard,et al.  Ligand: a versatile computerized approach for characterization of ligand-binding systems. , 1980, Analytical biochemistry.

[17]  J. McGrath,et al.  THE DISTRIBUTION OF ADRENOCEPTORS AND OTHER DRUG RECEPTORS BETWEEN THE TWO ENDS OF THE RAT VAS DEFERENS AS REVEALED BY SELECTIVE AGONISTS AND ANTAGONISTS , 1980, British journal of pharmacology.

[18]  G. Racz,et al.  Responsiveness of isolated cerebral arteries to various pharmacologic agents and to transmural electrical stimulation. , 1980, Proceedings of the Western Pharmacology Society.

[19]  Y. Kasuya,et al.  Variation of postjunctional natures along the length of the rat vas deferens as a cause of regional difference in the sensitivity to norepinephrine. , 1979, Archives internationales de pharmacodynamie et de therapie.

[20]  J. McGrath Adrenergic and 'non‐adrenergic' components in the contractile response of the vas deferens to a single indirect stimulus. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[21]  J. Pennefather,et al.  Regional variation in the distribution of alpha-adrenoreceptors in the vas deferens of the rat. , 1976, Archives internationales de pharmacodynamie et de therapie.

[22]  R. Furchgott The Classification of Adrenoceptors (Adrenergic Receptors). An Evaluation from the Standpoint of Receptor Theory , 1972 .

[23]  B. Altura,et al.  Heterogeneity of drug receptors in different segments of rabbit thoracic aorta. , 1970, European journal of pharmacology.

[24]  D. Waud On the measurement of the affinity of partial agonists for receptors. , 1969, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[25]  R. Furchgott,et al.  COMPARISON OF DISSOCIATION CONSTANTS AND OF RELATIVE EFFICACIES OF SELECTED AGONISTS ACTING ON PARASYMPATHETIC RECEPTORS * , 1967 .

[26]  H. Schild,et al.  SOME QUANTITATIVE USES OF DRUG ANTAGONISTS , 1997, British journal of pharmacology and chemotherapy.

[27]  O. H. Lowry,et al.  Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. , 1951, The Journal of biological chemistry.