Goal setting and the differential influence of self-regulatory processes on complex decision-making performance.

The effects of goal setting and cognitive self-regulatory processes were examined on a highly complex task, a managerial decision-making simulation. It was hypothesized that the presence vs. absence of a specific performance goal would moderate the strength of relations between performance and 2 self-regulatory processes: self-efficacy judgments and self-evaluative reactions. Ss received either a moderately or extremely difficult task goal, or no specific goal. Self-regulatory processes were assessed after an initial trial block. Regression analyses revealed that, as predicted, both self-regulatory processes more strongly affected performance when Ss received a specific goal. Contrary to earlier findings obtained with simple activities, dissatisfaction with prior outcomes impaired performance. Ss who were dissatisfied with past attainments exerted much decision effort but adopted inferior task strategies that produced poorer results.

[1]  A. Bandura,et al.  Differential engagement of self-reactive influences in cognitive motivation , 1986, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.

[2]  A Bandura,et al.  Perceived self-efficacy in coping with cognitive stressors and opioid activation. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  Robert P. Steel,et al.  A meta-analytic study of the effects of goal setting on task performance: 1966-1984 , 1987 .

[4]  Eugene F. Stone,et al.  Clarifying some controversial issues surrounding statistical procedures for detecting moderator variables: Empirical evidence and related matters. , 1989 .

[5]  A. Bandura Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychological review.

[6]  D. Schunk Self-Efficacy Perspective On Achievement Behavior , 1984 .

[7]  Kurt Lewin,et al.  Level of aspiration. , 1944 .

[8]  A. Isen,et al.  Affect, accessibility of material in memory, and behavior: a cognitive loop? , 1978, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  A. Bandura,et al.  Effect of perceived controllability and performance standards on self-regulation of complex decision making. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  M. A. Campion,et al.  A control systems conceptualization of the goal-setting and changing process , 1982 .

[11]  Trevor C. Bailey,et al.  Some Unanswered Questions about Goal Effects: A Recommended Change in Research Methods , 1985 .

[12]  Charles S. Carver,et al.  Principles of self-regulation: Action and emotion. , 1990 .

[13]  C. Carver,et al.  Attention and Self-Regulation: A Control-Theory Approach to Human Behavior , 1981 .

[14]  Jay J.J. Christensen-Szalanski,et al.  A further examination of the selection of problem-solving strategies: The effects of deadlines and analytic aptitudes , 1980 .

[15]  Dillon K. Inouye,et al.  Learned helplessness through modeling: The role of perceived similarity in competence. , 1978 .

[16]  Lawrence A. Pervin,et al.  Goal concepts in personality and social psychology. , 1989 .

[17]  C. Spielberger,et al.  Stress and Anxiety , 1981 .

[18]  A. Bandura,et al.  Impact of conceptions of ability on self-regulatory mechanisms and complex decision making. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  T. Connolly,et al.  Goals, strategy development and task performance: Some limits on the efficacy of goal setting , 1989 .

[20]  Barbara Means,et al.  The influence of positive affect on decision-making strategy. , 1983 .

[21]  A. Bandura The self system in reciprocal determinism. , 1978 .

[22]  Henry L. Tosi A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance , 1991 .

[23]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Task complexity as a moderator of goal effects: A meta-analysis. , 1987 .

[24]  J. Nicholls Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. , 1984 .

[25]  Trevor C. Bailey,et al.  Mechanisms governing organizational performance in complex decision-making environments , 1990 .

[26]  D. Kirschenbaum Self-regulatory failure: A review with clinical implications. , 1987 .

[27]  A. Bandura Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[28]  C. Carver,et al.  Self-directed attention and the comparison of self with standards , 1983 .

[29]  A. Bandura,et al.  Self-evaluative and self-efficacy mechanisms governing the motivational effects of goal systems. , 1983 .

[30]  J. Hunt,et al.  Personality and the behavior disorders , 1944 .

[31]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  Effect of self-efficacy, goals, and task strategies on task performance. , 1984 .

[32]  E. A. Locke Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives , 1968 .

[33]  Daniel Cervone,et al.  Sequence Anchoring and Self-Efficacy: Primacy Effects in the Consideration of Possibilities , 1989 .

[34]  Albert Bandura,et al.  Self-regulation of motivation and action through internal standards and goal systems. , 1989 .

[35]  C. Dweck,et al.  A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality , 1988 .

[36]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[37]  Joseph P. Forgas,et al.  Mood effects on decision making strategies , 1989 .

[38]  L. Rehm A self-control model of depression , 1977 .

[39]  E. A. Locke,et al.  A theory of goal setting & task performance , 1990 .

[40]  M. E. Tubbs,et al.  Goal setting: A meta-analytic examination of the empirical evidence. , 1986 .

[41]  D. Cervone,et al.  Anchoring, Efficacy and Action: The Influence of Judgmental Heuristics on Self-Efficacy Judgments a , 1986 .

[42]  F. H. Kanfer,et al.  Self-management methods. , 1991 .

[43]  Irwin G. Sarason,et al.  Anxiety, cognitive interference, and performance. , 1990 .

[44]  Philip M. Podsakoff,et al.  Effects of feedback sign and credibility on goal setting and task performance , 1989 .

[45]  M. Humphreys,et al.  Personality, motivation, and performance: a theory of the relationship between individual differences and information processing. , 1984, Psychological review.