Measurement of articulation functions using adaptive test procedures

The conventional methods for measuring speech intelligibility/discrimination present entire lists of words at constant levels whereas an adaptive procedure shifts levels within a single list according to a preselected strategy. The results reported in this paper indicate that adaptive testing of monosyllabic speech communication : 1) provides reasonably stable and accurate results with a CNC (words with a consonant-vowel-consonant structure) test vocabulary of 50 words; 2) permits an efficient description of selected points on the rising portion of an articulation function; and 3) gives the tester a number of flexible testing options such as choice of strategies and preselection of target scores. In addition, the potential exists for estimation of measurement errors both within and between test sessions, with these estimates based on either group or individual test responses.

[1]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  C D Creelman,et al.  Some pitfalls in adaptive testing: comments on "temporal integration and periodicity pitch". , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  E Z Lasky,et al.  Adaptive threshold procedures: BUDTIF. , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  G. B. Wetherill,et al.  SEQUENTIAL ESTIMATION OF POINTS ON A PSYCHOMETRIC FUNCTION. , 1965, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[5]  D L Bode,et al.  Stability and accuracy of adaptive tests of speech discrimination. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  R. Campbell Context and sequence effects with an adaptive threshold procedure. , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  M. M. Taylor,et al.  PEST: Efficient Estimates on Probability Functions , 1967 .

[8]  R Carhart,et al.  An expanded test for speech discrimination utilizing CNC monosyllabic words. Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6. SAM-TR-66-55. , 1966, [Technical report] SAM-TR. USAF School of Aerospace Medicine.

[9]  H Levitt,et al.  Use of a sequential strategy in intelligibility testing. , 1967, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.