Mathematical models for optimizing production chain planning in salmon farming

The salmon farming production chain is structured in four consecutive phases: freshwater, seawater, plant processing, and distribution and marketing. The phases interact in a pull manner, freshwater stocks fish to meet seawater’s demand, seawater produces to meet plant processing biomass demand, and the processing plant produces to satisfy consumers’ demand. Freshwater planning decisions are in regard to which freshwater center the fish should be located depending on the state of development of the fish. The goal is to satisfy seawater’s demand while minimizing costs. In the seawater phase, the fish are first placed in seawater centers, and then sent to the processing plant as they approach suitable harvest conditions. The goal of seawater is to maximize harvested biomass while satisfying processing plant’s demand. This paper presents two mixed-integer linear programming models—one for the freshwater phase and another for the seawater phase. These models are designed in such a way that the production planning is well integrated and more efficient and incorporates the requirements of the farm operator’s freshwater and seawater units (biological, economic, and health-related constraints) ensuring that production in both phases is better coordinated. The development of the two models was based on the farming operations of one of the main producer farms in Chile. Preliminary evaluations of the models indicate that they not only succeed in enforcing constraints that are difficult to be met by manual planning but also led to more effective results in terms of the objectives set out.

[1]  Marc Mangel,et al.  Trade-offs between growth and mortality and the maintenance of individual variation in growth , 2001 .

[2]  O. I. Forsberg,et al.  Optimal harvesting of farmed Atlantic salmon at two cohort management strategies and different harvest operation restrictions , 1999 .

[3]  Martin L. Puterman,et al.  Development Of A Catch Allocation Tool Design For Production Planning At Js Mcmillan Fisheries , 2003 .

[4]  G. Rand International Federation of Operational Research Societies , 2013, Nature.

[5]  J. R. Brett 10 - Environmental Factors and Growth , 1979 .

[6]  O. I. Forsberg Optimal stocking and harvesting of size-structured farmed fish: a multi-period linear programming approach , 1996 .

[7]  Ted C. J. Turlings,et al.  Experimental evidence that plants under caterpillar attack may benefit from attracting parasitoids , 2001 .

[8]  Vladimir M. Veliov,et al.  Optimal harvesting time in a size-heterogeneous population , 2008 .

[9]  PingSun Leung,et al.  Modeling shrimp production and harvesting schedules , 1990 .

[10]  Dominique P. Bureau,et al.  Development of bioenergetic models and the Fish-PrFEQ software to estimate production, feeding ration and waste output in aquaculture , 1998 .

[11]  AldrinMagne,et al.  Prediction of biomass in Norwegian fish farms , 2011 .

[12]  Guillermo Durán,et al.  Optimizing salmon farm cage net management using integer programming , 2013, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[13]  Industria y Turismo. Artesanías de Colombia,et al.  Cadena de valor. , 2012 .

[14]  PingSun Leung,et al.  Optimal production schedule in commercial shrimp culture , 2006 .

[15]  Trond Bjørndal,et al.  Optimal Harvesting of Farmed Fish , 1988, Marine Resource Economics.

[16]  Alexandra M. Newman,et al.  Operations research in the natural resource industry , 2012, Int. Trans. Oper. Res..

[17]  Run Yu,et al.  Optimal harvesting strategies for a multi-cycle and multi-pond shrimp operation: A practical network model , 2005, Math. Comput. Simul..

[18]  B. Björnsson,et al.  Effects of stocking density on growth rate of halibut (Hippoglossus hippoglossus L.) reared in large circular tanks for three years , 1994 .

[19]  PingSun Leung,et al.  Modeling prawn production management system: A dynamic Markov decision approach , 1989 .