The Concept of Fit in Information Systems Research

The impacts of information technology on business performance has been a focus of research in recent years. In this regard, contingency models based on the notion of " fit " between the organization's management of IT, its environment, strategy, and structure seem to hold some promise. However, given different conceptual definitions of fit adopted and statistical analysis methods chosen by researchers, results of empirical studies may vary. Six perspectives are examined as they pertain to the relationships between the firm's environmental uncertainty, its strategic orientation, its structure, its strategic management of IT, and its performance, namely moderation, mediation and matching as bivariate approaches to fit, and covariation, profile deviation and gestalts as systems approaches. These relationships are analyzed by means of an empirical study of 110 small and medium-sized enterprises. Results obtained from applying and comparing the six perspectives illustrate their significant differences and confirm the need for conceptual and methodological rigor when applying contingency theory in IS research.

[1]  A. Winsor.  Sampling techniques. , 2000, Nursing times.

[2]  P. Julien.  The State of the Art in Small Business and Entrepreneurship , 2018 .

[3]  Alain Pinsonneault,et al.  Information Technology and the Nature of Managerial Work: From the Productivity Paradox to the Icarus Paradox? , 1998, MIS Q..

[4]  Lorin M. Hitt,et al.  Beyond the productivity paradox , 1998, CACM.

[5]  Jong-min Choe,et al.  The relationship model between the influence factors and the strategic applications of information systems , 1998 .

[6]  M. Krafft.  An Empirical Investigation of the Antecedents of Sales Force Control Systems , 1999 .

[7]  Yolande E. Chan,et al.  Business Strategic Orientation, Information Systems Strategic Orientation, and Strategic Alignment , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[8]  William R. King,et al.  Integration between Business Planning and Information Systems Planning: An Evolutionary-Contingency Perspective , 1997, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[9]  William R. King,et al.  Assessing the impact of integrating business planning and IS planning , 1996, Inf. Manag..

[10]  Arun Rai,et al.  Refocusing where and how IT value is realized: An empirical investigation , 1996 .

[11]  Varun Grover,et al.  An Empirically Derived Taxonomy of Information Technology Structure and Its Relationship to Organizational Structure , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[12]  Nava Pliskin,et al.  The effects of information systems integration and organizational culture on a firm's effectiveness , 1996, Inf. Manag..

[13]  V. Chagué.  Gérer la technologie dans les PME , 1996 .

[14]  Douglas L. MacLachlan,et al.  Fax Surveys: Return Patterns and Comparison with Mail Surveys , 1996 .

[15]  W. Currie.  Organizational structure and the use of information technology: Preliminary findings of a survey in the private and public sector , 1996 .

[16]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  Information Technology and Productivity: A Review of the Literature , 1996, Adv. Comput..

[17]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  The Use of Information Technology to Enhance Management School Education: A Theoretical View , 1995, MIS Q..

[18]  Guy Paré,et al.  Matching information technology and organizational structure: an empirical study with implications for performance , 1995 .

[19]  Louis Raymond,et al.  The Contribution of IT to the Bottom Line: A Contingency Perspective of Strategic Dimensions , 1995, ICIS.

[20]  Carol V. Brown,et al.  Alignment of the IS Functions With the Enterprise: Toward a Model of Antecedents , 1994, MIS Q..

[21]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  The Alignment between Organizational Critical Success Factors and Information Technology Capability in Academic Institutions , 1994 .

[22]  Varun Grover,et al.  Strategic Information Systems Revisited: A Study in Sustainability and Performance , 1994, MIS Q..

[23]  Lorin M. Hitt,et al.  The Three Faces of IT Value: Theory and Evidence , 1994, ICIS.

[24]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  The productivity paradox of information technology , 1993, CACM.

[25]  S. Zahra,et al.  Business strategy, technology policy and firm performance , 1993 .

[26]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  Information technology, incentives and the optimal number of suppliers , 1993, Proceedings of ELECTRO '94.

[27]  Yolande E. Chan,et al.  Investigating Information Systems Strategic Alignment , 1993, ICIS.

[28]  F. Bergeron,et al.  Information Technology and Organizational Structure Revisited: Implications for Performance , 1993, International Conference on Interaction Sciences.

[29]  Philip Powell,et al.  Information Technology and Business Strategy: A Synthesis of the Case for Reverse Causality , 1992, ICIS.

[30]  J. Livari,et al.  The organizational fit of information systems , 1992 .

[31]  J. Iivari.  The organizational fit of information systems , 1992, Inf. Syst. J..

[32]  Rashi Glazer.  Marketing in an Information-Intensive Environment: Strategic Implications of Knowledge as an Asset , 1991 .

[33]  William H. Glick,et al.  Understanding Technology-Structure Relationships: Theory Development and Meta-Analytic Theory Testing , 1991 .

[34]  Iris Vessey,et al.  Cognitive Fit: A Theory‐Based Analysis of the Graphs Versus Tables Literature* , 1991 .

[35]  Dennis F. Galletta,et al.  Cognitive Fit: An Empirical Study of Information Acquisition , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[36]  David J. Miller,et al.  Stale in the Saddle: CEO Tenure and the Match Between Organization and Environment , 1991 .

[37]  Paul Alpar,et al.  A Microeconomic Approach to the Measurement of Information Technology Value , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[38]  Albert L. Lederer,et al.  The Impact of the Environment on the Management of Information Systems , 1990, Inf. Syst. Res..

[39]  Peter Weill,et al.  An Assessment of the Contingency Theory of Management Information Systems , 1989, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[40]  Hamid Tavakolian,et al.  Linking the Information Technology Structure with Organizational Competitive Strategy: A Survey , 1989, MIS Q..

[41]  Peter Weill,et al.  Managing Investment in Information Technology: Mini Case Examples and Implications , 1989, MIS Q..

[42]  Richard Leifer,et al.  Matching Computer-Based Information Systems with Organizational Structures , 1988, MIS Q..

[43]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  Using Subjective Evaluations of Organizational Performance in Small Business Research , 1988 .

[44]  N. Venkatraman.  The Concept of Fit in Strategy Research: Towards Verbal and Statistical Congruence. , 1987 .

[45]  E. B. Swanson,et al.  Information systems in organization theory: a review , 1987 .

[46]  David Miller.  Strategy Making and Structure: Analysis and Implications for Performance , 1987 .

[47]  Danny Miller,et al.  Psychological and Traditional Determinants of Structure. , 1986 .

[48]  Donald H. Bender,et al.  Financial Impact of Information Processing , 1986, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[49]  L. Vogel,et al.  Strategy and Structure , 1986 .

[50]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. , 1985 .

[51]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  The Concept of Fit in Contingency Theory. , 1984 .

[52]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: The case of the privately-held firm and conglomerate business unit , 1984 .

[53]  N. Venkatraman,et al.  Exploring the Concept of “Fit” in Strategic Management , 1984 .

[54]  J. Ettlie,et al.  Organization Strategy and Structural Differences for Radical Versus Incremental Innovation , 1984 .

[55]  J. Turner.  Organizational Performance, Size, and the Use of Data Processing Resources , 1983 .

[56]  Marion G. Sobol,et al.  The relationship between computerization and performance: A strategy for maximizing the economic benefits of computerization , 1983, Inf. Manag..

[57]  Phillip Ein-Dor,et al.  Organizational Context and MIS Structure: Some Empirical Evidence , 1982, MIS Q..

[58]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  Strategies for Information Requirements Determination , 1982, IBM Syst. J..

[59]  William H. DeLone.  Firm Size and the Characteristics of Computer Use , 1981, MIS Q..

[60]  C. B. Schoonhoven.  Problems with contingency theory: testing assumptions hidden within the language of contingency "theory.". , 1981, Administrative science quarterly.

[61]  Danny Miller,et al.  TOWARD A NEW CONTINGENCY APPROACH: THE SEARCH FOR ORGANIZATIONAL GESTALTS , 1981 .

[62]  G. Rice,et al.  Decision Theory and the Small Businessman , 1979 .

[63]  Steven K. Paulson,et al.  Small Business and the Theory of Small Bureaucracies , 1979 .

[64]  J. Rockart.  Chief executives define their own data needs. , 1979, Harvard business review.

[65]  R E Miles,et al.  Organizational strategy, structure, and process. , 1978, Academy of management review. Academy of Management.

[66]  P. H. Friesen,et al.  Archetypes of Strategy Formulation , 1978 .

[67]  C. Freeman.  Economics of Industrial Innovation , 1975 .

[68]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Designing Complex Organizations , 1973 .

[69]  M. Crozier,et al.  Adapter les structures de l'entreprise : intégration ou différenciation , 1973 .

[70]  Robert E. Stauffer,et al.  THE STRUCTURE OF SMALL BUREAUCRACIES , 1966 .

[71]  Howard B. Lee,et al.  Foundations of Behavioral Research , 1965 .

[72]  J. Guilford,et al.  Fundamental statistics in psychology and education , 1943 .