Learning-based local-to-global landmark annotation for automatic 3D cephalometry

The annotation of three-dimensional (3D) cephalometric landmarks in 3D computerized tomography (CT) has become an essential part of cephalometric analysis, which is used for diagnosis, surgical planning, and treatment evaluation. The automation of 3D landmarking with high-precision remains challenging due to the limited availability of training data and the high computational burden. This paper addresses these challenges by proposing a hierarchical deep-learning method consisting of four stages: 1) a basic landmark annotator for 3D skull pose normalization, 2) a deep-learning-based coarse-to-fine landmark annotator on the midsagittal plane, 3) a low-dimensional representation of the total number of landmarks using variational autoencoder (VAE), and 4) a local-to-global landmark annotator. The implementation of the VAE allows two-dimensional-image-based 3D morphological feature learning and similarity/dissimilarity representation learning of the concatenated vectors of cephalometric landmarks. The proposed method achieves an average 3D point-to-point error of 3.63 mm for 93 cephalometric landmarks using a small number of training CT datasets. Notably, the VAE captures variations of craniofacial structural characteristics.

[1]  Giuseppe Baselli,et al.  Computer-aided cephalometric landmark annotation for CBCT data , 2016, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[2]  John K. Tsotsos,et al.  Knowledge-based landmarking of cephalograms. , 1986, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[3]  P. Corre,et al.  Three-dimensional architectural and structural analysis--a transition in concept and design from Delaire's cephalometric analysis. , 2014, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[4]  A. Barron Approximation and Estimation Bounds for Artificial Neural Networks , 1991, COLT '91.

[5]  Jimmy Ba,et al.  Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization , 2014, ICLR.

[6]  Nitish Srivastava,et al.  Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting , 2014, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[7]  Bulat Ibragimov,et al.  Fully automated quantitative cephalometry using convolutional neural networks , 2017, Journal of medical imaging.

[8]  Rajiv Balachandran,et al.  A knowledge-based algorithm for automatic detection of cephalometric landmarks on CBCT images , 2015, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[9]  P Hammond,et al.  An evaluation of active shape models for the automatic identification of cephalometric landmarks. , 2000, European journal of orthodontics.

[10]  Jin Keun Seo,et al.  Automatic 3D cephalometric annotation system using shadowed 2D image-based machine learning , 2019, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  Marcelo Romero,et al.  Automatic 3‐dimensional cephalometric landmarking based on active shape models in related projections , 2018, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[12]  Jin Keun Seo,et al.  Automatic Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Annotation System Using Three-Dimensional Convolutional Neural Networks , 2018, Comput. methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. Imaging Vis..

[13]  David C Hatcher,et al.  Comparison between traditional 2-dimensional cephalometry and a 3-dimensional approach on human dry skulls. , 2004, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[14]  J M Coggins,et al.  Automatic computerized radiographic identification of cephalometric landmarks. , 1998, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[15]  Gert Cauwenberghs,et al.  Robust cephalometric landmark identification using support vector machines , 2003, 2003 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2003. Proceedings. (ICASSP '03)..

[16]  Predrag Vucinić,et al.  Automatic landmarking of cephalograms using active appearance models. , 2010, European journal of orthodontics.

[17]  Daniela Giordano,et al.  Automatic Landmarking of Cephalograms by Cellular Neural Networks , 2005, AIME.

[18]  S T Nugent,et al.  Automatic landmarking of cephalograms. , 1989, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[19]  John B Ludlow,et al.  Assessment of phantom dosimetry and image quality of i-CAT FLX cone-beam computed tomography. , 2013, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[20]  R. Nalçaci,et al.  A comparison of two-dimensional radiography and three-dimensional computed tomography in angular cephalometric measurements. , 2010, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[21]  Maher A. Sid-Ahmed,et al.  An image processing system for locating craniofacial landmarks , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.