Breaking bad systems: using work domain analysis to identify strategies for disrupting terrorist cells

Terrorism represents a major global issue. Despite decades of research, interventions designed to prevent or disrupt terrorist activities are failing to adequately control the problem. This paper argues that a human factors systems-thinking approach may support the identification of novel, holistic and impactful interventions. To demonstrate, a systems analysis of a generic Islamic State terrorist cell, created using the work domain analysis phase of cognitive work analysis, is presented. The analysis is subsequently used to identify opportunities for disrupting terrorist cells and their activities. In addition to well-known and already applied interventions, the analysis identified a series of other opportunities for disrupting terrorist cell activities. Examples discussed include strategies designed to disrupt propaganda activities and the planning of terrorist attacks. The analysis also showcases the potential use of systems ergonomics for disrupting, as well as optimising, sociotechnical systems. The implications for ergonomics generally as well as counter-terrorism activities are

[1]  Paul M. Salmon,et al.  Sociotechnical systems as a framework for regulatory system design and evaluation: Using Work Domain Analysis to examine a new regulatory system. , 2017, Applied ergonomics.

[2]  Jéssica Cohen Villaverde,et al.  The future of counter-terrorism in Europe. The need to be lost in the correct direction , 2014, European Journal of Futures Research.

[3]  Quirin Schiermeier Attempts to predict terrorist attacks hit limits , 2015, Nature.

[4]  K. J. Vicente,et al.  Cognitive Work Analysis: Toward Safe, Productive, and Healthy Computer-Based Work , 1999 .

[5]  Gemma J M Read,et al.  What’s in a game? A systems approach to enhancing performance analysis in football , 2017, PloS one.

[6]  D. Cook Islamism and Jihadism: The Transformation of Classical Notions of Jihad into an Ideology of Terrorism , 2009 .

[7]  Neville A. Stanton,et al.  Integrating Human Factors Methods and Systems Thinking for Transport Analysis and Design , 2017 .

[8]  Nancy G. Leveson,et al.  A new accident model for engineering safer systems , 2004 .

[9]  A. Shapiro,et al.  National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism , 2010 .

[10]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  Risk management in a dynamic society: a modelling problem , 1997 .

[11]  Neville A Stanton,et al.  Fitting methods to paradigms: are ergonomics methods fit for systems thinking? , 2017, Ergonomics.

[12]  Guy H. Walker,et al.  Cognitive Work Analysis: Applications, Extensions and the Future , 2017 .