Prequalified Connections for Special and Intermediate Steel Moment Frames for Seismic Applications, ANSI/AISC 358-05

Building code provisions for the seismic resistant design of structures incorporate two basic types of requirements. The first of these is very similar to the code requirements for most other types of loading and comprises specification of minimum permissible strength and structural stiffness. The second is unique to design for seismic resistance and consists of prescriptive criteria on the detailing practice for the structural elements. While strength and stiffness requirements have been part of building codes for nearly 100 years, these detailing practice requirements, which include such things as prescription of the volumetric ratio and spacing of reinforcing in concrete structures, and permissible width/thickness ratios for elements of members in steel structures are a recent addition to the code. They were first introduced into the codes in the late 1960s and primarily affected the design of reinforced concrete structures. However, as researchers have continued to understand the importance of detailing to seismic performance and actual earthquakes have made clear to the profession that poor detailing practice directly leads to adverse structural behavior, the volume and complexity of these detailing requirements has steadily increased. Extensive detailing requirements for reinforced concrete structures were introduced into the building codes following the 1971 San Fernando earthquake. Requirements for timber and masonry structures were also added throughout the 1970s and 1980s as relatively modest earthquakes, such as the 1979 Imperial Valley, California; 1983 Coalinga, California and 1984 Morgan Hill, California earthquakes indicated problems associated with improperly detailed structures of this construction type. However, relatively few requirements for detailing of steel structures were placed in the codes during this period, largely because there were few examples of poor performance of steel structures. This began to change with the 1985 Mexico City, Mexico earthquake in which several large steel buildings in the lake bed region of Mexico City collapsed. Additional requirements for detailing of steel structures were introduced following the 1987 Whittier Narrows, California earthquake. Most of these requirements pertained to the detailing of braced steel frames. The 1994 Northridge, California earthquake resulted in the introduction of extensive code detailing requirements for moment-resisting steel frames. Immediately following the earthquake, brittle fractures were discovered in the beam to column connections of several buildings in the San Fernando Valley (Figures 1, 2). This damage was

[1]  Jin–Ho Kim,et al.  Title : Influence of Panel Zone Strength and Beam Web Connection Method on Seismic Performance of Reduced Beam Section Steel Moment Connections , .

[2]  Norimitsu Kishi,et al.  Evaluation of rigidity of extended end-plate connections , 1997 .

[3]  Henning Agerskov ANALYSIS OF BOLTED CONNECTIONS SUBJECT TO PRYING , 1977 .

[4]  Ronald L. Meng Design of moment end-plate connections for seismic loading , 1996 .

[5]  Neil David Johnstone Bolted end plate beam to column connections under earthquake type loading : a report. , 1981 .

[6]  Janice J. Chambers,et al.  Effect of Reduced Beam Section Frame Elements on Stiffness of Moment Frames , 2003 .

[7]  Jeffrey L. Western,et al.  Guidelines for structural bolting in accordance with the AISC (American Institute of Steel Construction) ninth edition Manual of Steel Construction , 1990 .

[8]  Egor P. Popov,et al.  Cyclic Behavior of End‐Plate Moment Connections , 1990 .

[9]  W. J. Hall,et al.  Recommended Postearthquake Evaluation and Repair Criteria for Welded Steel Moment-Frame Buildings , 2000 .

[10]  R S Nair,et al.  High Strength Bolts Subject to Tension and Prying , 1974 .

[11]  Bryan T. Adey,et al.  Cyclic loading of end plate moment connections , 2000 .

[12]  Sheng-Jin Chen,et al.  Ductile Steel Beam-to-Column Connections for Seismic Resistance , 1996 .

[13]  Henning Agerskov HIGH-STRENGTH BOLTED CONNECTIONS SUBJECT TO PRYING , 1976 .

[14]  Donald Paul Kline Performance of snug tight bolts in moment end-plate connections , 1989 .

[15]  Thomas M. Murray,et al.  Design of 8-bolt Stiffened Moment End Plates , 1988 .

[16]  Egor P. Popov,et al.  Design of steel MRF connections before and after 1994 Northridge earthquake , 1998 .

[17]  William McGuire,et al.  High Strength Bolted Moment Connections , 1965 .

[18]  Robert B. Fleischman,et al.  Top and Seat Angle Connections and End Plate Connections: Snug vs Fully Pre-Tensioned Bolts , 1989 .

[19]  Reidar Bjorhovde,et al.  Connections in steel structures : behaviour, strength, and design , 1988 .

[20]  Andrew J. Zekany,et al.  Experimental Investigation of Dogbone Moment Connections , 1998 .

[21]  Bryan T. Adey,et al.  Extended end plate moment connections under cyclic loading , 1998 .

[22]  Thomas M. Murray,et al.  Behavior and Design of Large‐Capacity Moment End Plates , 1990 .

[23]  Allan P. Mann,et al.  LIMIT DESIGN OF EXTENDED END-PLATE CONNECTIONS , 1979 .

[24]  James M. Ricles,et al.  Development of Seismic Guidelines for Deep-Column Steel Moment Connections , 2004 .

[25]  Sheng-Jin Chen,et al.  Effect of composite action on seismic performance of steel moment connections with reduced beam sections , 2001 .

[26]  C. Tenopir,et al.  Fema (Federal Emergency Management Agency) database requirements assessment and resource directory model. Final report, 24 August 1981-15 May 1982 , 1982 .

[27]  N. Krishnamurthy,et al.  Correlation between 2- and 3-dimensional finite element analysis of steel bolted end-plate connections☆ , 1976 .

[28]  Reidar Bjorhovde,et al.  Classification System for Beam‐to‐Column Connections , 1990 .

[29]  Robert Tremblay,et al.  Loading rate effects and influence of floor slab on the seismic performance of RBS connections for steel moment resisting frames , 1997 .

[30]  Thomas M. Murray Recent developments for the design of moment end-plate connections , 1988 .

[31]  E P Popov,et al.  PERFORMANCE OF LARGE SEISMIC STEEL MOMENT CONNECTIONS UNDER CYCLIC LOADS , 1989 .

[32]  N Krishnamurthy A Fresh Look at Bolted End-Plate Behavior and Design , 1978 .

[33]  Ali Abolmaali,et al.  End-plate connection moment-rotation relationship , 1987 .

[34]  Ahmed Ghobarah,et al.  Extended End-Plate Connections Under Cyclic Loading: Behaviour and Design , 1990 .

[35]  T. Kitjasateanphun,et al.  Seismic performance of steel moment frames with reduced beam sections , 2000 .

[36]  Ahmed Ghobarah,et al.  Cyclic Behavior of Extended End‐Plate Joints , 1992 .

[37]  Ahmed Ghobarah,et al.  Behaviour of extended end-plate connections under cyclic loading , 1990 .

[38]  Henning Agerskov Bolted end-plate connections for steel structures , 1979 .

[39]  William McGuire,et al.  Analysis of T-Stub Flange-to-Column Connections , 1973 .

[40]  Thomas M. Murray,et al.  Behavior of Extended End-Plate Moment Connections Subject to Cyclic Loading , 2002 .

[41]  Chia-Ming Uang,et al.  Moment Frame Connection Development and Testing for the City of Hope National Medical Center , 1997 .