Anticipating governance challenges in synthetic biology: Insights from biosynthetic menthol

This paper advances an anticipatory governance framework to investigate and prepare for the potential implications of an emerging technology. Within the growing domain of synthetic biology, we draw on an end-to-end assessment of biosynthetic menthol that incorporates consideration of multiple dimensions of production and use. Based on documentary analysis, available data, and interviews, our approach unfolds in three steps. First, we map the sociotechnical transition in menthol production, comparing existing agricultural and chemical production methods with new biosynthetic processes – or what we call the biological (bio) turn. Second, we explore the rationales, promises and expectations of menthol's bio-turn and explore the drivers of transition so as to clarify which goals and values innovation is addressing. Third, we reflect on the opportunities and challenges of such a transition to put forward an agenda for responsible innovation and anticipatory governance. The bio-turn in menthol is analysed through five responsible innovation dimensions: the potential distribution of benefits and burdens; social resilience; environmental sustainability; infrastructure and business models; and public perception and public interest. We consider the implications of our analysis both for the responsible development and application of synthetic biology for menthol and for the broader assessment and sociotechnical construction of emerging technologies.

[1]  Erika Check Hayden,et al.  Synthetic biology lures Silicon Valley investors , 2015, Nature.

[2]  B. Schäfer Menthol: Minze versus Tagasako-Prozess , 2013 .

[3]  Archana Singh,et al.  Essential Oil Composition of Menthol Mint ( Mentha arvensis ) and Peppermint ( Mentha piperita ) Cultivars at Different Stages of Plant Growth from Kumaon Region of Western Himalaya , 2010 .

[4]  A. Jess,et al.  Epimerisation of menthol stereoisomers: Kinetic studies of the heterogeneously catalysed menthol production , 2009 .

[5]  C. Olsen,et al.  De Novo Biosynthesis of Vanillin in Fission Yeast (Schizosaccharomyces pombe) and Baker's Yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) , 2009, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[6]  Sandy Ong Singapore bets big on synthetic biology , 2018 .

[7]  Gautam Mukunda,et al.  Aspects of the political economy of development and synthetic biology , 2009, Systems and Synthetic Biology.

[8]  C. Apesteguía,et al.  Highly selective synthesis of menthols from citral in a one-step process , 2004 .

[9]  Sumesh Sukumara,et al.  A multi-scale, multi-disciplinary approach for assessing the technological, economic and environmental performance of bio-based chemicals. , 2015, Biochemical Society transactions.

[10]  Arie Rip,et al.  Introduction of New Technology; Making Use of Recent Insights from Sociology and Economics of Technology , 1995 .

[11]  James H. Clark,et al.  Green chemistry: today (and tomorrow) , 2006 .

[12]  Clark A. Miller,et al.  Introduction: Ethics and anticipatory governance of nano-neurotechnological convergence , 2013 .

[13]  Ray Quay,et al.  Anticipatory Governance , 2010 .

[14]  P. Lorenz,et al.  White biotechnology: differences in US and EU approaches? , 2005, Trends in biotechnology.

[15]  Christopher Coenen,et al.  Synthetic Genomics and Synthetic Biology Applications Between Hopes and Concerns , 2013, Current genomics.

[16]  Arno Behr,et al.  Myrcene as a natural base chemical in sustainable chemistry: a critical review. , 2009, ChemSusChem.

[17]  Andrew Balmer,et al.  Engaging the Senses, Understanding Publics: Research Methods, Science Engagement, and Synthetic Biology. , 2017, Trends in biotechnology.

[18]  H. Woo,et al.  Microbial Synthesis of Myrcene by Metabolically Engineered Escherichia coli. , 2015, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[19]  R. Eils,et al.  Editorial: Synthetic biology – ready for application , 2015, Biotechnology journal.

[20]  Jens Nielsen,et al.  Impact of synthetic biology and metabolic engineering on industrial production of fine chemicals. , 2015, Biotechnology advances.

[21]  M. Singh,et al.  Evaluation of alternate menthol mint (Mentha arvensis L.) based intensive cropping systems for Indo-Gangetic plains of north India , 2012 .

[22]  A. Rip,et al.  The past and future of constructive technology assessment , 1997 .

[23]  J. Stilgoe,et al.  Developing a framework for responsible innovation* , 2013, The Ethics of Nanotechnology, Geoengineering and Clean Energy.

[24]  M. Lynch Against Reflexivity as an Academic Virtue and Source of Privileged Knowledge , 2000 .

[25]  P. Benneworth,et al.  Introducing the dilemma of societal alignment for inclusive and responsible research and innovation , 2018, Journal of Responsible Innovation.

[26]  C. Sell A Fragrant Introduction to Terpenoid Chemistry , 2003 .

[27]  I. Baxendale,et al.  Development of the industrial synthesis of vitamin A , 2016 .

[28]  Erika Check Hayden Synthetic biology lures Silicon Valley investors , 2015, Nature.

[29]  Jay D Keasling,et al.  Production of isoprenoid pharmaceuticals by engineered microbes , 2006, Nature chemical biology.

[30]  W. Adger Social and ecological resilience: are they related? , 2000 .

[31]  Andrew Balmer,et al.  Everyday Uncertainty Work: Making Sense of Biosynthetic Menthol , 2018, Engaging Science, Technology, and Society.

[32]  Emma Frow,et al.  Sustainability and Anticipatory Governance in Synthetic Biology , 2012 .

[33]  Jan L. Youtie,et al.  Tracking the emergence of synthetic biology , 2017, Scientometrics.

[34]  James R. Johnson,et al.  GeneMill: A 21st century platform for innovation , 2016, Biochemical Society transactions.

[35]  A. Grunwald Assigning meaning to NEST by technology futures: extended responsibility of technology assessment in RRI , 2017 .

[36]  A. Aharoni,et al.  Volatile science? Metabolic engineering of terpenoids in plants. , 2005, Trends in plant science.

[37]  Jan Youtie,et al.  Social science contributions compared in synthetic biology and nanotechnology , 2015 .

[38]  David Rejeski,et al.  Synthetic biology: Four steps to avoid a synthetic-biology disaster , 2012, Nature.

[39]  Srikant Sharma,et al.  Characteristics of menthol mint Mentha arvensis cultivated on industrial scale in the Indo-Gangetic plains , 2002 .

[40]  Christopher L. Tucci,et al.  A Critical Assessment of Business Model Research , 2017 .

[41]  Barbara Ribeiro,et al.  Transitions in biofuel technologies: : An appraisal of the social impacts of cellulosic ethanol using the Delphi method , 2015 .

[42]  Rainer Breitling,et al.  Metabolomics tools for the synthetic biology of natural products. , 2018, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[43]  S. Jasanoff Technologies of Humility: Citizen Participation in Governing Science , 2003 .

[44]  류지형,et al.  정유(Essential Oil)와 그 응용 , 2008 .

[45]  P. Tiwari Recent advances and challenges in trichome research and essential oil biosynthesis in Mentha arvensis L , 2016 .

[46]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  A Guidebook for Technology Assessment and Impact Analysis , 1982 .

[47]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  Public Value Mapping and Science Policy Evaluation , 2011 .

[48]  E. Takano,et al.  A ‘Plug and Play’ Platform for the Production of Diverse Monoterpene Hydrocarbon Scaffolds in Escherichia coli , 2016, ChemistrySelect.

[49]  L. Drummond,et al.  Microbial Cell Factories for the Production of Terpenoid Flavor and Fragrance Compounds. , 2017, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[50]  David H Guston,et al.  Understanding ‘anticipatory governance’ , 2014, Social Studies of Science.

[51]  D. Edge,et al.  The social shaping of technology , 1988 .

[52]  Ashutosh Kumar Singh,et al.  Effect of gibberellic acid and calliterpenone on plant growth attributes, trichomes, essential oil biosynthesis and pathway gene expression in differential manner in Mentha arvensis L. , 2013, Plant physiology and biochemistry : PPB.

[53]  Eleanore T. Wurtzel,et al.  Plant metabolism, the diverse chemistry set of the future , 2016, Science.

[54]  Kate Millar,et al.  A Mobilising Concept? Unpacking Academic Representations of Responsible Research and Innovation , 2016, Science and Engineering Ethics.

[55]  Joseph F. Coates,et al.  The role of formal models in technology assessment , 1976 .

[56]  D. MacKenzie,et al.  The social shaping of technology : how the refrigerator got its hum , 1985 .

[57]  G. Stephanopoulos,et al.  Engineering Microbes to Synthesize Plant Isoprenoids. , 2016, Methods in enzymology.

[58]  Risto Karinen,et al.  Toward Anticipatory Governance: The Experience with Nanotechnology , 2009 .

[59]  B. M. Lange,et al.  Biosynthesis and Biotechnology of High-Value p-Menthane Monoterpenes, Including Menthol, Carvone, and Limonene. , 2015, Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology.

[60]  A. Papachristodoulou,et al.  Engineering and ethical perspectives in synthetic biology , 2012, EMBO reports.

[61]  Pablo Schyfter,et al.  Intentions, Expectations and Institutions: Engineering the Future of Synthetic Biology in the USA and the UK , 2015 .

[62]  S. Bhatia,et al.  Metabolic engineering for the production of clinically important molecules: Omega‐3 fatty acids, artemisinin, and taxol , 2012, Biotechnology journal.

[63]  Susan C. Roberts,et al.  Production and engineering of terpenoids in plant cell culture. , 2007, Nature chemical biology.

[64]  C. Pfeiffer,et al.  Multi‐layered social resilience , 2010 .

[65]  L.J. Clarke,et al.  Synthetic biology in the UK – An outline of plans and progress , 2016, Synthetic and systems biotechnology.

[66]  Eriko Takano,et al.  Enzymatic Menthol Production: One-Pot Approach Using Engineered Escherichia coli. , 2015, ACS synthetic biology.

[67]  Martina Baumann,et al.  CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing – new and old ethical issues arising from a revolutionary technology , 2016 .

[68]  D. Kell,et al.  Engineering the “Missing Link” in Biosynthetic (−)-Menthol Production: Bacterial Isopulegone Isomerase , 2018, ACS catalysis.

[69]  David Rejeski,et al.  Four steps to avoid a synthetic-biology disaster: Synthetic biology , 2012 .

[70]  Kirsten Maclean,et al.  Six attributes of social resilience , 2014 .

[71]  A. Singh,et al.  Economic Analysis of Menthol Mint Cultivation in Uttar Pradesh: A Case Study of Barabanki District , 2011 .

[72]  Theo Vermeire,et al.  Scientific Opinion on Risk Assessment of Synthetic Biology. , 2016, Trends in biotechnology.

[73]  Carly Whittaker,et al.  Challenge clusters facing LCA in environmental decision-making—what we can learn from biofuels , 2015, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[74]  M. S. Fernandes,et al.  Production and Quality of Menthol Mint Essential Oil and Antifungal and Antigerminative Activity , 2014 .

[75]  Gi Na Lee,et al.  The impact of synthetic biology. , 2013, ACS synthetic biology.

[76]  C. Marris The Construction of Imaginaries of the Public as a Threat to Synthetic Biology , 2015 .

[77]  Wolfgang J. Liebert,et al.  Collingridge’s dilemma and technoscience , 2010, Poiesis Prax..

[78]  I. Vermaak,et al.  Menthol: a simple monoterpene with remarkable biological properties. , 2013, Phytochemistry.

[79]  F. Anwar,et al.  Seasonal variation in content, chemical composition and antimicrobial and cytotoxic activities of essential oils from four Mentha species. , 2010, Journal of the science of food and agriculture.

[80]  L. Winner DO ARTIFACTS HAVE (cid:1) POLITICS? , 2022 .

[81]  C. Pfeiffer,et al.  Social resilience : a new approach in mitigation research , 2010 .

[82]  B. Wynne Elephants in the rooms where publics encounter “science”?: A response to Darrin Durant, “Accounting for expertise: Wynne and the autonomy of the lay public” , 2008 .

[83]  Le Feuvre RA,et al.  SYNBIOCHEM Synthetic Biology Research Centre, Manchester – A UK foundry for fine and speciality chemicals production , 2016, Synthetic and systems biotechnology.

[84]  Elizabeth J. Davidson,et al.  Technology Frames and Framing: A Socio-Cognitive Investigation of Requirements Determination , 2002, MIS Q..

[85]  M. Morange,et al.  Microbial Cell Factories , 2006 .

[86]  M. Lopes Engineering biological systems toward a sustainable bioeconomy , 2015, Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology.

[87]  B. M. Lawrence Natural and Synthetic Menthol , 2006 .

[88]  Andrew Stirling,et al.  Social-ecological resilience and socio-technical transitions: critical issues for sustainability governance , 2008 .

[89]  Frances H. Arnold,et al.  Machine learning to design integral membrane channelrhodopsins for efficient eukaryotic expression and plasma membrane localization , 2017, PLoS Comput. Biol..