Practical Machine Learning-Based Sepsis Prediction

Sepsis is a life-threatening clinical syndrome and one of the most expensive conditions treated in hospitals. It is challenging to detect due to the nonspecific clinical signs and the absence of gold standard diagnostics. However, early recognition of sepsis and optimal treatments for sepsis are of paramount importance to improve the condition’s management and patient outcomes. This paper aims to delineate key aspects of current sepsis detection systems, including their dependency on clinical expert and laboratory biometric features requiring ongoing critical care intervention, the efficacy of vital sign measures, and the effect of the study population with respect to the precision of sepsis prediction. The AUROC performances of XGBoost models trained on a heterogenous ICU patient group (n=3932) showed significant degradations (p<0.05) as the expert and laboratory biomarker features are removed systematically and vital sign features taken in ICU settings are left. The performance of XGBoost models trained only with vital sign features on a more homogeneous group of ICU patients (n=1927) had a significantly (P<0.05) improved AUPRC to moderate level. The presented results highlight the importance of making a practical machine learning system for sepsis prediction by considering the availability of dominant features as well as personalizing sepsis prediction by configuring it to the specific demographics of a targeted population.

[1]  A. Duggal,et al.  Epidemiology and Predictors of 30‐Day Readmission in Patients With Sepsis , 2019, Chest.

[2]  E. Crouser,et al.  Epidemiology and Costs of Sepsis in the United States—An Analysis Based on Timing of Diagnosis and Severity Level* , 2018, Critical care medicine.

[3]  Corey Chivers,et al.  A Machine Learning Algorithm to Predict Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: Development, Implementation, and Impact on Clinical Practice. , 2019, Critical care medicine.

[4]  Shamim Nemati,et al.  Early Prediction of Sepsis From Clinical Data: The PhysioNet/Computing in Cardiology Challenge 2019 , 2019, 2019 Computing in Cardiology (CinC).

[5]  A. Keeley,et al.  The recognition and management of sepsis and septic shock: a guide for non-intensivists , 2017, Postgraduate Medical Journal.

[6]  Peter Szolovits,et al.  MIMIC-III, a freely accessible critical care database , 2016, Scientific Data.

[7]  R. Bellomo,et al.  The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). , 2016, JAMA.

[8]  S. Tolle,et al.  Making health care safer. , 2005, Nursing management.

[9]  Ritankar Das,et al.  Effect of a machine learning-based severe sepsis prediction algorithm on patient survival and hospital length of stay: a randomised clinical trial , 2017, BMJ Open Respiratory Research.

[10]  Susan Gruber,et al.  Incidence and Trends of Sepsis in US Hospitals Using Clinical vs Claims Data, 2009-2014 , 2017, JAMA.

[11]  P. Marik,et al.  SIRS, qSOFA and new sepsis definition. , 2017, Journal of thoracic disease.

[12]  A. Lazăr,et al.  Precision Medicine and its Role in the Treatment of Sepsis: A Personalised View , 2019, Journal of critical care medicine.

[13]  J. Greenslade,et al.  Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, Quick Sequential Organ Function Assessment, and Organ Dysfunction: Insights From a Prospective Database of ED Patients With Infection , 2017, Chest.

[14]  Ashish Sharma,et al.  Early Prediction of Sepsis from Clinical Data: the PhysioNet/Computing in Cardiology Challenge 2019 , 2019, 2019 Computing in Cardiology (CinC).

[15]  Xing Liu,et al.  Early Prediction of Sepsis Using Multi-Feature Fusion Based XGBoost Learning and Bayesian Optimization , 2019, 2019 Computing in Cardiology Conference (CinC).

[16]  Uli K. Chettipally,et al.  Multicentre validation of a sepsis prediction algorithm using only vital sign data in the emergency department, general ward and ICU , 2018, BMJ Open.