RNA polymerase II trigger loop residues stabilize and position the incoming nucleotide triphosphate in transcription

A structurally conserved element, the trigger loop, has been suggested to play a key role in substrate selection and catalysis of RNA polymerase II (pol II) transcription elongation. Recently resolved X-ray structures showed that the trigger loop forms direct interactions with the β-phosphate and base of the matched nucleotide triphosphate (NTP) through residues His1085 and Leu1081, respectively. In order to understand the role of these two critical residues in stabilizing active site conformation in the dynamic complex, we performed all-atom molecular dynamics simulations of the wild-type pol II elongation complex and its mutants in explicit solvent. In the wild-type complex, we found that the trigger loop is stabilized in the “closed” conformation, and His1085 forms a stable interaction with the NTP. Simulations of point mutations of His1085 are shown to affect this interaction; simulations of alternative protonation states, which are inaccessible through experiment, indicate that only the protonated form is able to stabilize the His1085-NTP interaction. Another trigger loop residue, Leu1081, stabilizes the incoming nucleotide position through interaction with the nucleotide base. Our simulations of this Leu mutant suggest a three-component mechanism for correctly positioning the incoming NTP in which (i) hydrophobic contact through Leu1081, (ii) base stacking, and (iii) base pairing work together to minimize the motion of the incoming NTP base. These results complement experimental observations and provide insight into the role of the trigger loop on transcription fidelity.

[1]  R. Silverman The Organic Chemistry of Enzyme Catalyzed Reactions , 2012 .

[2]  Robert Landick,et al.  Role of the RNA polymerase trigger loop in catalysis and pausing , 2010, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[3]  Julio O. Ortiz,et al.  A movie of the RNA polymerase nucleotide addition cycle. , 2009, Current opinion in structural biology.

[4]  M. Levitt,et al.  Structural Basis of Transcription: Backtracked RNA Polymerase II at 3.4 Angstrom Resolution , 2009, Science.

[5]  P. Cramer,et al.  Structural basis of transcription inhibition by α-amanitin and implications for RNA polymerase II translocation , 2008, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[6]  Craig D. Kaplan,et al.  The RNA polymerase II trigger loop functions in substrate selection and is directly targeted by alpha-amanitin. , 2008, Molecular cell.

[7]  Carsten Kutzner,et al.  GROMACS 4:  Algorithms for Highly Efficient, Load-Balanced, and Scalable Molecular Simulation. , 2008, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[8]  R. Kornberg The molecular basis of eukaryotic transcription , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Robert Landick,et al.  A central role of the RNA polymerase trigger loop in active-site rearrangement during transcriptional pausing. , 2007, Molecular cell.

[10]  Tahir H. Tahirov,et al.  Structural basis for transcription elongation by bacterial RNA polymerase , 2007, Nature.

[11]  Jonathan Tennyson,et al.  Water vapour in the atmosphere of a transiting extrasolar planet , 2007, Nature.

[12]  Irina Artsimovitch,et al.  Structural basis for substrate loading in bacterial RNA polymerase , 2007, Nature.

[13]  Craig D. Kaplan,et al.  Structural Basis of Transcription: Role of the Trigger Loop in Substrate Specificity and Catalysis , 2006, Cell.

[14]  P. Hanawalt,et al.  Transcription arrest at an abasic site in the transcribed strand of template DNA. , 2006, Chemical research in toxicology.

[15]  B. Coulombe,et al.  Structural Perspective on Mutations Affecting the Function of Multisubunit RNA Polymerases , 2006, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[16]  Arkady Mustaev,et al.  A Ratchet Mechanism of Transcription Elongation and Its Control , 2005, Cell.

[17]  D. Bushnell,et al.  Structural Basis of Transcription Nucleotide Selection by Rotation in the RNA Polymerase II Active Center , 2004, Cell.

[18]  Wei Zhang,et al.  A point‐charge force field for molecular mechanics simulations of proteins based on condensed‐phase quantum mechanical calculations , 2003, J. Comput. Chem..

[19]  Heather A. Carlson,et al.  Development of polyphosphate parameters for use with the AMBER force field , 2003, J. Comput. Chem..

[20]  P. Cramer,et al.  Structural Basis of Transcription: An RNA Polymerase II Elongation Complex at 3.3 Å Resolution , 2001, Science.

[21]  R. Young,et al.  Transcription of eukaryotic protein-coding genes. , 2000, Annual review of genetics.

[22]  J. Greenblatt,et al.  Stimulation of Transcription by Mutations Affecting Conserved Regions of RNA Polymerase II , 1998, Journal of bacteriology.

[23]  R. Conaway,et al.  The RNA polymerase II elongation complex , 1995, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[24]  M. Levitt,et al.  Potential energy function and parameters for simulations of the molecular dynamics of proteins and nucleic acids in solution , 1995 .

[25]  Wilfred F. van Gunsteren,et al.  Lattice‐sum methods for calculating electrostatic interactions in molecular simulations , 1995 .

[26]  M. Mumby,et al.  Protein serine/threonine phosphatases: structure, regulation, and functions in cell growth. , 1993, Physiological reviews.

[27]  M. Levitt Accurate modeling of protein conformation by automatic segment matching. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.

[28]  Hoover,et al.  Canonical dynamics: Equilibrium phase-space distributions. , 1985, Physical review. A, General physics.

[29]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water , 1983 .