An alternative approach for computing seismic response with accidental eccentricity

Accidental eccentricity is a non-standard assumption for seismic design of tall buildings. Taking it into consideration requires reanalysis of seismic resistance, which requires either time consuming computation of natural vibration of eccentric structures or finding a static displacement solution by applying an approximated equivalent torsional moment for each eccentric case. This study proposes an alternative modal response spectrum analysis (MRSA) approach to calculate seismic responses with accidental eccentricity. The proposed approach, called the Rayleigh Ritz Projection-MRSA (RRP-MRSA), is developed based on MRSA and two strategies: (a) a RRP method to obtain a fast calculation of approximate modes of eccentric structures; and (b) an approach to assemble mass matrices of eccentric structures. The efficiency of RRP-MRSA is tested via engineering examples and compared with the standard MRSA (ST-MRSA) and one approximate method, i.e., the equivalent torsional moment hybrid MRSA (ETM-MRSA). Numerical results show that RRP-MRSA not only achieves almost the same precision as ST-MRSA, and is much better than ETM-MRSA, but is also more economical. Thus, RRP-MRSA can be in place of current accidental eccentricity computations in seismic design.

[1]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Lateral-Torsional Coupling in Earthquake Response of Frame Buildings , 1989 .

[2]  Juan Carlos de la Llera,et al.  Using accidental eccentricity in code-specified static and dynamic analyses of buildings , 1994 .

[3]  Melvin L. Baron,et al.  Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division , 1956 .

[4]  Edward Cohen,et al.  Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures , 1990 .

[5]  Qiang Qiang Zhang,et al.  The Two-Stage Design Method of Isolated Structures Based on New Code for Seismic Design of Buildings , 2013 .

[6]  Edward L. Wilson,et al.  Three dimensional static and dynamic analysis of structures : A physical approach with emphasis on earthquake engineering , 2000 .

[7]  A. M. Chandler,et al.  Torsional coupling effects in the earthquake response of asymmetric buildings , 1986 .

[8]  Stéphane Hans,et al.  First European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology , 2006 .

[9]  N. Null Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures , 2003 .

[10]  Qian Zhao,et al.  Accelerated subspace iteration with aggressive shift , 2007 .

[11]  Yasin M. Fahjan,et al.  AN ALTERNATIVE PROCEDURE FOR ACCIDENTAL ECCENTRICITY IN DYNAMIC MODAL ANALYSES OF BUILDINGS , 2006 .

[12]  K. Bathe Finite Element Procedures , 1995 .

[13]  Pu Chen,et al.  Modal re‐analysis of rotary wind turbine blades in refinement design , 2012 .

[14]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Earthquake Response of Torsionally Coupled, Frame Buildings , 1989 .

[15]  M. Fardis,et al.  Designer's guide to EN 1998-1 and en 1998-5 Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance; general rules, seismic actions, design rules for buildings, foundations and retaining structures/ M.Fardis[et al.] , 2005 .

[16]  R. Clough,et al.  Dynamics Of Structures , 1975 .

[17]  K. Bathe,et al.  Large Eigenvalue Problems in Dynamic Analysis , 1972 .

[18]  K. Bathe,et al.  An accelerated subspace iteration method , 1980 .

[19]  Silvia Dimova,et al.  Seismic Design of Symmetric Structures for Accidental Torsion , 2003 .