INTRODUCTION It is well known that physical activity has an anabolic effect on the bone tissue. But there is a lack of information about the effect of intensive physical activity in childhood, particularly at the prepubertal stage. The type, frequency, intensity, and duration of activity that best produce the desired increases in mass and strength of human bones have not yet been well determined. MATERIAL AND METHODS To examine the influence of different kinesiological treatments on body composition and bone mineral density we studied a group of prepubertal boys at the starting phase of their peak bone mass acquisition. 90 healthy prepubertal boys took part in this study. The sport group consisted of 28 swimmers (aged 10.80.8) and 32 soccer players (aged 10.70.5), who had been training their chosen high-level sport activity for at least 1 year (8-12 h per week for swimmers, 10-15 h per week for soccer players). 30 boys (aged 11.2 +/- 0.7) doing 1.5 h per week of physical activity in school served as a control group. Bone mineral density measurements of the left and right calcaneus were done by ultrasound densitometer "Sahara". The body composition was assessed by Body Fat Analyser "BES 200 Z". RESULTS There were significant differences between soccer players and control group as regards fat mass and bone mineral density (p<.01). Besides, significant differences were determined between a group of swimmers and control group as regads fat mass (p<.03), while the differences in bone mineral density were not very obvious (p<.67).
[1]
Alon Eliakim,et al.
Exercise training, menstrual irregularities and bone development in children and adolescents.
,
2003,
Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology.
[2]
C. Cooper,et al.
Prenatal and childhood influences on osteoporosis.
,
2002,
Best practice & research. Clinical endocrinology & metabolism.
[3]
A. Roche,et al.
Sex differences in bone mass acquisition during growth: the Fels Longitudinal Study.
,
2001,
Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.
[4]
H. McKay,et al.
A Six‐Year Longitudinal Study of the Relationship of Physical Activity to Bone Mineral Accrual in Growing Children: The University of Saskatchewan Bone Mineral Accrual Study
,
1999,
Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
[5]
R. Heaney,et al.
Timing of peak bone mass in Caucasian females and its implication for the prevention of osteoporosis. Inference from a cross-sectional model.
,
1994,
The Journal of clinical investigation.
[6]
H. Frost.
Bone “mass” and the “mechanostat”: A proposal
,
1987,
The Anatomical record.