An Error Reduction Algorithm to Improve Lidar Turbulence Estimates for Wind Energy

Abstract. Remote-sensing devices such as lidars are currently being investigated as alternatives to cup anemometers on meteorological towers for the measurement of wind speed and direction. Although lidars can measure mean wind speeds at heights spanning an entire turbine rotor disk and can be easily moved from one location to another, they measure different values of turbulence than an instrument on a tower. Current methods for improving lidar turbulence estimates include the use of analytical turbulence models and expensive scanning lidars. While these methods provide accurate results in a research setting, they cannot be easily applied to smaller, vertically profiling lidars in locations where high-resolution sonic anemometer data are not available. Thus, there is clearly a need for a turbulence error reduction model that is simpler and more easily applicable to lidars that are used in the wind energy industry. In this work, a new turbulence error reduction algorithm for lidars is described. The Lidar Turbulence Error Reduction Algorithm, L-TERRA, can be applied using only data from a stand-alone vertically profiling lidar and requires minimal training with meteorological tower data. The basis of L-TERRA is a series of physics-based corrections that are applied to the lidar data to mitigate errors from instrument noise, volume averaging, and variance contamination. These corrections are applied in conjunction with a trained machine-learning model to improve turbulence estimates from a vertically profiling WINDCUBE v2 lidar. The lessons learned from creating the L-TERRA model for a WINDCUBE v2 lidar can also be applied to other lidar devices. L-TERRA was tested on data from two sites in the Southern Plains region of the United States. The physics-based corrections in L-TERRA brought regression line slopes much closer to 1 at both sites and significantly reduced the sensitivity of lidar turbulence errors to atmospheric stability. The accuracy of machine-learning methods in L-TERRA was highly dependent on the input variables and training dataset used, suggesting that machine learning may not be the best technique for reducing lidar turbulence intensity (TI) error. Future work will include the use of a lidar simulator to better understand how different factors affect lidar turbulence error and to determine how these errors can be reduced using information from a stand-alone lidar.

[1]  Wayne O. Miller,et al.  Wind power curve modeling in complex terrain using statistical models , 2015 .

[2]  David Schlipf,et al.  Estimating Turbulence Statistics and Parameters from Ground- and Nacelle-Based Lidar Measurements: IEA Wind Expert Report , 2015 .

[3]  Jennifer F. Newman Optimizing Lidar Scanning Strategies for Wind Energy Turbulence Measurements , 2014 .

[4]  Julie K. Lundquist,et al.  Quantifying error of lidar and sodar Doppler beam swinging measurements of wind turbine wakes using computational fluid dynamics , 2015 .

[5]  S. Wharton,et al.  Measuring turbine inflow with vertically-profiling lidar in complex terrain , 2014 .

[6]  S. P. S. Arya,et al.  Introduction to micrometeorology , 1988 .

[7]  Christoph Knigge,et al.  Scopes and Challenges of Dual-Doppler Lidar Wind Measurements—An Error Analysis , 2013 .

[8]  R. Barthelmie,et al.  Wind Measurements from Arc Scans with Doppler Wind Lidar , 2015 .

[9]  Rebecca J. Barthelmie,et al.  3D Wind and Turbulence Characteristics of the Atmospheric Boundary Layer , 2014 .

[10]  A. Kolmogorov,et al.  The local structure of turbulence in incompressible viscous fluid for very large Reynolds numbers , 1991, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[11]  William S. C. Chang,et al.  Principles of Lasers and Optics , 2005 .

[12]  J. Lundquist,et al.  Assessing atmospheric stability and its impacts on rotor‐disk wind characteristics at an onshore wind farm , 2010 .

[13]  P. Mason Atmospheric boundary layer flows: Their structure and measurement , 1995 .

[14]  R. Hardesty,et al.  Remote sensing of atmospheric wind velocities using solid-state and CO2 coherent laser systems , 1996, Proc. IEEE.

[15]  K. A. Browning,et al.  The Determination of Kinematic Properties of a Wind Field Using Doppler Radar , 1968 .

[16]  Jimmy W. Voyles,et al.  The Arm Climate Research Facility: A Review of Structure and Capabilities , 2013 .

[17]  J. Freidman,et al.  Multivariate adaptive regression splines , 1991 .

[18]  Julia Gottschall,et al.  Can wind lidars measure turbulence , 2011 .

[19]  B. Efron,et al.  A Leisurely Look at the Bootstrap, the Jackknife, and , 1983 .

[20]  Petra M. Klein,et al.  Testing and validation of multi‐lidar scanning strategies for wind energy applications , 2016 .

[21]  Sean C. Arms,et al.  Variability of Surface Air Temperature over Gently Sloped Terrain , 2008 .

[22]  Lars Landberg,et al.  Wind Power Meteorology , 1997 .

[23]  Emmanuel Branlard,et al.  Retrieving wind statistics from average spectrum of continuous-wave lidar , 2013 .

[24]  D. L. Elliott,et al.  Effects of wind shear and turbulence on wind turbine power curves , 1990 .

[25]  Ronald Calhoun,et al.  Wind turbulence estimates in a valley by coherent Doppler lidar , 2011 .

[26]  J. Wyngaard,et al.  The Effects of Probe-Induced Flow Distortion on Atmospheric Turbulence Measurements , 1981 .

[27]  J. Mann The spatial structure of neutral atmospheric surface-layer turbulence , 1994, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[28]  B. Witha,et al.  Lidar Simulations to Study Measurements of Turbulence in Different Atmospheric Conditions , 2014 .

[29]  G.J.W. Van Bussel,et al.  Influence of atmospheric stability on wind turbine loads , 2013 .

[30]  Phillip M. Stepanian,et al.  A Time Series Sodar Simulator Based on Large-Eddy Simulation , 2014 .

[31]  M. Boquet,et al.  Return on Investment of a Lidar Remote Sensing Device , 2010 .

[32]  J. Mann,et al.  May 09, 2020 A six-beam method to measure turbulence statistics using , 2014 .

[33]  A. Swift,et al.  Speed and Direction Shear in the Stable Nocturnal Boundary Layer , 2009 .

[34]  Guy N. Pearson,et al.  Vertical velocity variance and skewness in clear and cloud‐topped boundary layers as revealed by Doppler lidar , 2009 .

[35]  P. Klein,et al.  The Impacts of Atmospheric Stability on the Accuracy of Wind Speed Extrapolation Methods , 2014 .

[36]  Torben Mikkelsen,et al.  Spatial averaging-effects on turbulence measured by a continuous-wave coherent lidar , 2009 .

[37]  Paul Fleming,et al.  Using machine learning to predict wind turbine power output , 2013 .

[38]  Larry K. Berg,et al.  Turbine‐scale wind field measurements using dual‐Doppler lidar , 2015 .

[39]  Rozenn Wagner,et al.  Accounting for the effect of turbulence on wind turbine power curves , 2014 .

[40]  K. Moran,et al.  The Colorado Wind-Profiling Network , 1984 .

[41]  Ronald Calhoun,et al.  Coherent Doppler lidar for wind farm characterization , 2013 .

[42]  F. Guillén,et al.  Multi-site testing and evaluation of remote sensing instruments for wind energy applications , 2013 .

[43]  H. Fernando,et al.  Virtual towers using coherent doppler lidar during the Joint Urban 2003 dispersion experiment , 2006 .

[44]  J. Mann,et al.  A review of turbulence measurements using ground-based wind lidars , 2013 .

[45]  D. J. Malcolm,et al.  WindPACT Turbine Rotor Design Study , 2006 .

[46]  Erik Lundtang Petersen,et al.  Wind power meteorology. Part I: climate and turbulence , 1998 .

[47]  Volker Wulfmeyer,et al.  Measuring Second- through Fourth-Order Moments in Noisy Data , 2000 .

[48]  C. Weitkamp Lidar, Range-Resolved Optical Remote Sensing of the Atmosphere , 2005 .

[49]  Dean Vickers,et al.  Quality Control and Flux Sampling Problems for Tower and Aircraft Data , 1997 .

[50]  Rozenn Wagner,et al.  Lidar Scanning of Momentum Flux in and above the Atmospheric Surface Layer , 2010 .

[51]  Torben Mikkelsen,et al.  Time series analysis of continuous-wave coherent Doppler Lidar wind measurements , 2008 .

[52]  S. Gryning,et al.  Offshore wind profiling using light detection and ranging measurements , 2009 .

[53]  Ervin Bossanyi,et al.  Handbook of wind energy , 2001 .

[54]  J. Peinke,et al.  Turbulence, a challenging problem for wind energy , 2004 .

[55]  Fernando Porté-Agel,et al.  3D Turbulence Measurements Using Three Synchronous Wind Lidars: Validation against Sonic Anemometry , 2014 .

[56]  J. Lundquist,et al.  The modification of wind turbine performance by statistically distinct atmospheric regimes , 2012 .

[57]  Ioannis Antoniou,et al.  The influence of the wind speed profile on wind turbine performance measurements , 2009 .

[58]  J. Streicher,et al.  Lidar: Range-Resolved Optical Remote Sensing of the Atmosphere , 2005 .

[59]  Phillip B. Chilson,et al.  Evaluation of three lidar scanning strategies for turbulence measurements , 2015 .

[60]  C. M. Sonnenschein,et al.  Signal-to-Noise Relationships for Coaxial Systems that Heterodyne Backscatter from the Atmosphere. , 1971, Applied optics.

[61]  Michael Harris,et al.  Introduction to continuous-wave Doppler lidar , 2012 .

[62]  N. Vasiljević A time-space synchronization of coherent Doppler scanning lidars for 3D measurements of wind fields , 2014 .

[63]  Ervin Bossanyi,et al.  Wind Energy Handbook , 2001 .