On the origins of logarithmic number-to-position mapping.

The number-to-position task, in which children and adults are asked to place numbers on a spatial number line, has become a classic measure of number comprehension. We present a detailed experimental and theoretical dissection of the processing stages that underlie this task. We used a continuous finger-tracking technique, which provides detailed information about the time course of processing stages. When adults map the position of 2-digit numbers onto a line, their final mapping is essentially linear, but intermediate finger location show a transient logarithmic mapping. We identify the origins of this log effect: Small numbers are processed faster than large numbers, so the finger deviates toward the target position earlier for small numbers than for large numbers. When the trajectories are aligned on the finger deviation onset, the log effect disappears. The small-number advantage and the log effect are enhanced in dual-task setting and are further enhanced when the delay between the 2 tasks is shortened, suggesting that these effects originate from a central stage of quantification and decision making. We also report cases of logarithmic mapping-by children and by a brain-injured individual-which cannot be explained by faster responding to small numbers. We show that these findings are captured by an ideal-observer model of the number-to-position mapping task, comprising 3 distinct stages: a quantification stage, whose duration is influenced by both exact and approximate representations of numerical quantity; a Bayesian accumulation-of-evidence stage, leading to a decision about the target location; and a pointing stage. (PsycINFO Database Record

[1]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Number line compression and the illusory perception of random numbers. , 2010, Experimental psychology.

[2]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Selective impairment for reading numbers and number words: a single case study , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  R. Bakeman Recommended effect size statistics for repeated measures designs , 2005, Behavior research methods.

[4]  Cornelius Weiller,et al.  “I know your name, but not your number” – Patients with verbal short-term memory deficits are impaired in learning sequences of digits , 2015, Neuropsychologia.

[5]  R. Siegler,et al.  The Development of Numerical Estimation , 2003, Psychological science.

[6]  M. Desmurget,et al.  An ‘automatic pilot’ for the hand in human posterior parietal cortex: toward reinterpreting optic ataxia , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[7]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Numeric comparison in a visually-guided manual reaching task , 2008, Cognition.

[8]  J. Algina,et al.  Generalized eta and omega squared statistics: measures of effect size for some common research designs. , 2003, Psychological methods.

[9]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The Number Sense: How the Mind Creates Mathematics. , 1998 .

[10]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Numerical estimation in preschoolers. , 2010, Developmental psychology.

[11]  Pierre Jolicœur,et al.  All-or-none bottleneck versus capacity sharing accounts of the psychological refractory period phenomenon , 2002, Psychological research.

[12]  S Dehaene,et al.  The psychophysics of numerical comparison: A reexamination of apparently incompatible data , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  H Pashler,et al.  Processing stages in overlapping tasks: evidence for a central bottleneck. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  R. Núñez,et al.  Squeezing, striking, and vocalizing: Is number representation fundamentally spatial? , 2011, Cognition.

[15]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. , 1993 .

[16]  S Dehaene,et al.  Competition between past and present. Assessment and interpretation of verbal perseverations. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[17]  W. Fias,et al.  “I can write seven but I can’t say it”: a case of domain-specific phonological output deficit for numbers , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[18]  J. Houk,et al.  Deciding when and how to correct a movement: discrete submovements as a decision making process , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  D. Whitney,et al.  Serial dependence in visual perception , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[20]  Emmanuel Dupoux,et al.  Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison. , 1990 .

[21]  L. Dehaene,et al.  Neologistic Jargon Sparing Numbers: A Category-specific Phonological Impairment , 1997 .

[22]  S. Dehaene Symbols and quantities in parietal cortex: elements of a mathematical theory of number representation and manipulation , 2007 .

[23]  Florent Meyniel,et al.  The Sense of Confidence during Probabilistic Learning: A Normative Account , 2015, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[24]  H. Pashler Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[25]  Marinella Cappelletti,et al.  Dissociations in numerical abilities revealed by progressive cognitive decline in a patient with semantic dementia , 2005, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[26]  M. Brysbaert Arabic number reading: On the nature of the numerical scale and the origin of phonological recoding. , 1995 .

[27]  D. Burr,et al.  Compressive mapping of number to space reflects dynamic encoding mechanisms, not static logarithmic transform , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  Michael N. Shadlen,et al.  Temporal context calibrates interval timing , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[29]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Engaging the motor system with masked orthographic primes: A kinematic analysis , 2008 .

[30]  L. Maloney,et al.  Decision-theoretic models of visual perception and action , 2010, Vision Research.

[31]  W. Schwarz,et al.  The perception of temporal order along the mental number line. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  M. Sigman,et al.  Dynamics of the Central Bottleneck: Dual-Task and Task Uncertainty , 2006, PLoS biology.

[33]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[34]  Thomas A. Farmer,et al.  Hand in Motion Reveals Mind in Motion , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[35]  Julie L. Booth,et al.  Development of numerical estimation in young children. , 2004, Child development.

[36]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Decoding the Dynamics of Action, Intention, and Error Detection for Conscious and Subliminal Stimuli , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[37]  Jason Friedman,et al.  Linking cognitive and reaching trajectories via intermittent movement control , 2013 .

[38]  D. J. Simpson,et al.  Pointing the way , 1993, Nature.

[39]  Susana Ruiz Fernández,et al.  Number magnitude determines gaze direction: Spatial–numerical association in a free-choice task , 2011, Cortex.

[40]  S Dehaene,et al.  CALCULATING WITHOUT READING: UNSUSPECTED RESIDUAL ABILITIES IN PURE ALEXIA , 2000, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[41]  J. Friedman,et al.  The Flexibility of Nonconsciously Deployed Cognitive Processes: Evidence from Masked Congruence Priming , 2011, PloS one.

[42]  Philippe Pinel,et al.  Tuning Curves for Approximate Numerosity in the Human Intraparietal Sulcus , 2004, Neuron.

[43]  Naama Friedmann,et al.  Steps towards understanding the phonological output buffer and its role in the production of numbers, morphemes, and function words , 2015, Cortex.

[44]  M. Coltheart,et al.  Pointing the way to new constraints on the dynamical claims of computational models. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[45]  J. Cantlon,et al.  Shared System for Ordering Small and Large Numbers in Monkeys and Humans , 2006, Psychological science.

[46]  Samuel Shaki,et al.  Reading habits for both words and numbers contribute to the SNARC effect , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[47]  Tom Verguts,et al.  Distance in Motion: Response Trajectories Reveal the Dynamics of Number Comparison , 2011, PloS one.

[48]  M von Aster Developmental cognitive neuropsychology of number processing and calculation: varieties of developmental dyscalculia. , 2000, European child & adolescent psychiatry.

[49]  Emmanuel Dupoux,et al.  AN INFLUENCE OF SYNTACTIC AND SEMANTIC VARIABLES ON WORD FORM RETRIEVAL , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[50]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Two mental calculation systems: A case study of severe acalculia with preserved approximation , 1991, Neuropsychologia.

[51]  Robert S. Siegler,et al.  Representational change and children’s numerical estimation , 2007, Cognitive Psychology.

[52]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Changing your mind: a computational mechanism of vacillation , 2009, Nature.

[53]  John Opfer,et al.  Development of Numerosity Estimation: A Linear to Logarithmic Shift? , 2015, CogSci.

[54]  M. Sigman,et al.  Parsing a Cognitive Task: A Characterization of the Mind's Bottleneck , 2005, PLoS biology.

[55]  H. Barth,et al.  Developmental change in numerical estimation. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[56]  Jeffrey N Rouder,et al.  Children's cognitive representation of the mathematical number line. , 2014, Developmental science.

[57]  Robert S. Siegler,et al.  Development of Numerical Estimation , 2004 .

[58]  Melissa E. Libertus,et al.  Comment on "Log or Linear? Distinct Intuitions of the Number Scale in Western and Amazonian Indigene Cultures" , 2009, Science.

[59]  T. Flash,et al.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[60]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  How do we convert a number into a finger trajectory? , 2013, Cognition.

[61]  Timothy E. J. Behrens,et al.  Learning the value of information in an uncertain world , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[62]  D. Algom,et al.  Size congruity effects with two-digit numbers: Expanding the number line? , 2006, Memory & cognition.

[63]  E. Spelke,et al.  Sources of mathematical thinking: behavioral and brain-imaging evidence. , 1999, Science.

[64]  Julie L. Booth,et al.  Developmental and individual differences in pure numerical estimation. , 2006, Developmental psychology.

[65]  Yong-chun Cai,et al.  The effect of numerical magnitude on the perceptual processing speed of a digit. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[66]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Hidden cognitive states revealed in choice reaching tasks , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[67]  Stella F. Lourenco,et al.  Multiple spatial representations of number: evidence for co-existing compressive and linear scales , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[68]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Target selection in visual search as revealed by movement trajectories , 2008, Vision Research.

[69]  Hilary C Barth,et al.  The development of numerical estimation: evidence against a representational shift. , 2011, Developmental science.

[70]  J. Gold,et al.  Neural computations that underlie decisions about sensory stimuli , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[71]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Cognitive euroscience: Scalar variability in price estimation and the cognitive consequences of switching to the euro , 2002, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[72]  Naama Friedmann,et al.  Breaking down number syntax: Spared comprehension of multi-digit numbers in a patient with impaired digit-to-word conversion , 2014, Cortex.

[73]  E. Miller,et al.  Coding of Cognitive Magnitude Compressed Scaling of Numerical Information in the Primate Prefrontal Cortex , 2003, Neuron.

[74]  David C. Burr,et al.  Linear mapping of numbers onto space requires attention , 2012, Cognition.