Age of acquisition predicts naming and lexical-decision performance above and beyond 22 other predictor variables: An analysis of 2,342 words

Age of acquisition (AoA) ratings were obtained and were used in hierarchical regression analyses to predict naming and lexical-decision performance for 2,342 words (from Balota, Cortese, Sergent-Marshall, Spieler, & Yap, 2004). In the analyses, AoA was included in addition to the set of predictors used by Balota et al. (2004). AoA significantly predicted latency performance on both tasks above and beyond the standard predictor set. However, AoA was more strongly related to lexical-decision performance than to naming performance. Finally, the previously reported effect of imageability on naming latencies by Balota et al. was not significant with AoA included as a factor. These results are consistent with the idea either that AoA has a semantic/lexical locus or that AoA effects emerge primarily in situations in which the input–output mapping is arbitrary.

[1]  Robert H. Logie,et al.  Meaning-dependent ratings of imagery, age of acquisition, familiarity, and concreteness for 387 ambiguous words , 1980 .

[2]  D. Balota,et al.  A word’s meaning affects the decision in lexical decision , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[3]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. , 1989, Psychological review.

[4]  Andrew W. Ellis,et al.  ROLES OF WORD FREQUENCY AND AGE OF ACQUISITION IN WORD NAMING AND LEXICAL DECISION , 1995 .

[5]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  The special role of rimes in the description, use, and acquisition of English orthography. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[6]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains. , 1996, Psychological review.

[7]  Andrew W. Ellis,et al.  Age of Acquisition Norms for a Large Set of Object Names and Their Relation to Adult Estimates and Other Variables , 1997 .

[8]  David A. Balota,et al.  Bringing Computational Models of Word Naming Down to the Item Level , 1997 .

[9]  Catriona M. Morrison,et al.  Real age of acquisition effects in word naming and lexical decision. , 2000, British journal of psychology.

[10]  M Brysbaert,et al.  Age-of-acquisition effects in semantic processing tasks. , 2000, Acta psychologica.

[11]  Matthew A. Lambon Ralph,et al.  Age of acquisition effects in adult lexical processing reflect loss of plasticity in maturing systems: insights from connectionist networks. , 2000 .

[12]  M. L. Lambon Ralph,et al.  Age of acquisition effects in adult lexical processing reflect loss of plasticity in maturing systems: insights from connectionist networks. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  Michael Wilson MRC Psycholinguistic Database , 2001 .

[14]  D. Howard,et al.  Age of acquisition and imageability ratings for a large set of words, including verbs and function words , 2001, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[15]  M Coltheart,et al.  DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. , 2001, Psychological review.

[16]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Subjective frequency estimates for 2,938 monosyllabic words , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[17]  Andrew W. Ellis,et al.  Reply to Strain, Patterson, and Seidenberg (2002). , 2002 .

[18]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Age of Acquisition Effects in Word Reading and Other Tasks , 2002 .

[19]  Rebecca Treiman,et al.  Phonetic Biases in Voice Key Response Time Measurements , 2002 .

[20]  A. Ellis,et al.  What exactly interacts with spelling-sound consistency in word naming? , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[21]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Theories of word naming interact with spelling-sound consistency. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[22]  Christopher Barry,et al.  The influence of age of acquisition in word reading and other tasks : A never ending story ? , 2004 .

[23]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Imageability ratings for 3,000 monosyllabic words , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[24]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Age-of-acquisition effects in reading aloud: Tests of cumulative frequency and frequency trajectory , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[25]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[26]  Joshua B. Tenenbaum,et al.  The Large-Scale Structure of Semantic Networks: Statistical Analyses and a Model of Semantic Growth , 2001, Cogn. Sci..

[27]  Barbara J. Juhasz,et al.  Age-of-acquisition effects in word and picture identification. , 2005, Psychological bulletin.

[28]  R. Baayen,et al.  Morphological influences on the recognition of monosyllabic monomorphemic words , 2006 .

[29]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  The effect of age of acquisition: Partly frequency related, partly frequency independent , 2006 .

[30]  R. Johnston,et al.  Age of acquisition and lexical processing , 2006 .

[31]  H. Stadthagen-González,et al.  The Bristol norms for age of acquisition, imageability, and familiarity , 2006, Behavior research methods.

[32]  M. L. Lambon Ralph,et al.  Age of acquisition effects depend on the mapping between representations and the frequency of occurrence: Empirical and computational evidence , 2006 .

[33]  Rebecca Treiman,et al.  The English Lexicon Project , 2007, Behavior research methods.