A systematic analysis of duplicate records in Scopus
暂无分享,去创建一个
Rafael Aleixandre-Benavent | Remedios Aguilar-Moya | David Melero-Fuentes | Juan Carlos Valderrama Zurián | Juan Carlos Valderrama Zurián | R. Aleixandre-Benavent | J. C. V. Zurián | Remedios Aguilar-Moya | David Melero-Fuentes
[1] Fiorenzo Franceschini,et al. Errors in DOI indexing by bibliometric databases , 2014, Scientometrics.
[2] A. Kulkarni,et al. Comparisons of citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals. , 2009, JAMA.
[3] Juan Gorraiz,et al. A bibliometric analysis of pharmacology and pharmacy journals: Scopus versus Web of Science , 2008, J. Inf. Sci..
[4] Éric Archambault,et al. Comparing bibliometric statistics obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus , 2009 .
[5] Elizabeth S. Vieira,et al. A comparison of Scopus and Web of Science for a typical university , 2009, Scientometrics.
[6] Judit Bar-Ilan,et al. Which h-index? — A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar , 2008, Scientometrics.
[7] P. Jacsó. As we may search : Comparison of major features of the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar citation-based and citation-enhanced databases , 2005 .
[8] Anne-Wil Harzing,et al. Document categories in the ISI Web of Knowledge: Misunderstanding the Social Sciences? , 2012, Scientometrics.
[9] Gordana Budimir,et al. Assessment of research fields in Scopus and Web of Science in the view of national research evaluation in Slovenia , 2013, Scientometrics.
[10] Masood Fooladi,et al. A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases , 2013, ArXiv.
[11] Miguel A. García-Pérez,et al. Strange attractors in the Web of Science database , 2011, J. Informetrics.
[12] Lars Iselid,et al. Web of Science and Scopus: a journal title overlap study , 2008, Online Inf. Rev..
[13] Henk F. Moed,et al. Coverage and citation impact of oncological journals in the Web of Science and Scopus , 2008, J. Informetrics.
[14] Lokman I. Meho,et al. Assessing the scholarly impact of information studies: A tale of two citation databases—Scopus and Web of Science , 2009 .
[15] Matthew E Falagas,et al. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses , 2007, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.
[16] Svetla Baykoucheva,et al. Selecting a Database for Drug Literature Retrieval: A Comparison of MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science , 2010 .
[17] Rafael Aleixandre-Benavent,et al. Ciertas ventajas de scopus sobre web of science en un análisis bibliométrico sobre tabaquismo , 2013 .
[18] Yvonne Rogers,et al. Citation counting, citation ranking, and h-index of human-computer interaction researchers: A comparison of Scopus and Web of Science , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[19] Frances Boyle,et al. Scopus™: The Product and Its Development , 2006 .
[20] Evaristo Jiménez-Contreras,et al. Ranking of departments and researchers within a university using two different databases: Web of Science versus Scopus , 2009, Scientometrics.