A systematic review of feasibility studies promoting the use of mobile technologies in clinical research

Mobile technologies, such as smart phone applications, wearables, ingestibles, and implantables, are increasingly used in clinical research to capture study endpoints. On behalf of the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative, we aimed to conduct a systematic scoping review and compile a database summarizing pilot studies addressing mobile technology sensor performance, algorithm development, software performance, and/or operational feasibility, in order to provide a resource for guiding decisions about which technology is most suitable for a particular trial. Our systematic search identified 275 publications meeting inclusion criteria. From these papers, we extracted data including the medical condition, concept of interest captured by the mobile technology, outcomes captured by the digital measurement, and details regarding the sensors, algorithms, and study sample. Sixty-seven percent of the technologies identified were wearable sensors, with the remainder including tablets, smartphones, implanted sensors, and cameras. We noted substantial variability in terms of reporting completeness and terminology used. The data have been compiled into an online database maintained by the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative that can be filtered and searched electronically, enabling a user to find information most relevant to their work. Our long-term goal is to maintain and update the online database, in order to promote standardization of methods and reporting, encourage collaboration, and avoid redundant studies, thereby contributing to the design and implementation of efficient, high-quality trials.

[1]  Jennifer C. Goldsack,et al.  Use of Mobile Devices to Measure Outcomes in Clinical Research, 2010–2016: A Systematic Literature Review , 2018, Digital Biomarkers.

[2]  Kathryn Sandberg,et al.  How consumer physical activity monitors could transform human physiology research. , 2017, American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology.

[3]  M. Kessentini,et al.  A Systematic Literature Review , 2016 .

[4]  A. Dhawan Editorial Trends and Challenges in Translation of Point-of-Care Technologies in Healthcare. , 2018, IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine.

[5]  Adam B. Cohen,et al.  The Digital Outcome Measure , 2018, Digital Biomarkers.

[6]  Elena S. Izmailova,et al.  Wearable Devices in Clinical Trials: Hype and Hypothesis , 2018, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[7]  Jennifer J. Kohler,et al.  Modeled structural basis for the recognition of α2–3‐sialyllactose by soluble Klotho , 2017, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[8]  N. Schork,et al.  The n-of-1 clinical trial: the ultimate strategy for individualizing medicine? , 2011, Personalized medicine.

[9]  Daniel Austin,et al.  Use of High-Frequency In-Home Monitoring Data May Reduce Sample Sizes Needed in Clinical Trials , 2015, PloS one.

[10]  Tapas Mondal,et al.  Wearable Sensors for Remote Health Monitoring , 2017, Sensors.

[11]  Trudie Lang,et al.  Making randomised trials more efficient: report of the first meeting to discuss the Trial Forge platform , 2015, Trials.

[12]  John P. A. Ioannidis,et al.  Research: increasing value, reducing waste 2 , 2014 .

[13]  Annamalai Pandian,et al.  A review of recent trends and challenges in 3 D printing , 2016 .

[14]  Sean Khozin,et al.  Biometric monitoring devices for assessing end points in clinical trials: developing an ecosystem , 2017, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[15]  Stephen P. Wright,et al.  An analysis of how consumer physical activity monitors are used in biomedical research , 2017 .

[16]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis , 2014, The Lancet.

[17]  William Speier,et al.  Evaluating utility and compliance in a patient-based eHealth study using continuous-time heart rate and activity trackers , 2018, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[18]  Amy Loutfi,et al.  Data Mining for Wearable Sensors in Health Monitoring Systems: A Review of Recent Trends and Challenges , 2013, Sensors.

[19]  B. Djulbegovic,et al.  Bad reporting does not mean bad methods for randomised trials: observational study of randomised controlled trials performed by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[20]  Paul A. Fontelo,et al.  Utilization of the PICO framework to improve searching PubMed for clinical questions , 2007, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..