The effect of the descent technique and truck cabin layout on the landing impact forces.

The majority of injuries to truckers are caused by falls during the descent from the cab of the truck. Several studies have shown that the techniques used to descend from the truck and the layout of the truck's cabin are the principal cause of injury. The goal of the present study was to measure the effects of the descent techniques used by the trucker and the layout of the truck's cabin on the impact forces absorbed by the lower limbs and the back. Kinematic data, obtained with the aid of a video camera, were combined with the force platform data to allow for calculation of the lower limb and L5-S1 torques as well as L5-S1 compressive forces. The trucker descended from two different conventional tractor cabin layouts. Each trucker descended from cabin using either "facing the truck" (FT) or "back to the truck" (BT) techniques. The results demonstrate that the BT technique produces greater ground impact forces than the FT technique, particularly when the truck does not have a handrail. The BT technique also causes an increase in the compressive forces exerted on the back. In conclusion, the use of the FT technique along with the aids (i.e., handrails and all the steps) help lower the landing impact forces as well as the lumbosacral compressive forces.

[1]  M. Chu,et al.  An in vitro simulation study of impulsive force transmission along the lower skeletal extremity. , 1986, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  B T Bates,et al.  Contributions of lower extremity joints to energy dissipation during landings. , 2000, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[3]  A Ferretti,et al.  Knee ligament injuries in volleyball players , 1992, The American journal of sports medicine.

[4]  M. Lafortune,et al.  Transfer function between tibial acceleration and ground reaction force. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  B. Nigg,et al.  Biomechanics of the musculo-skeletal system , 1995 .

[6]  David A. Winter,et al.  Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement , 1990 .

[7]  A Garg,et al.  Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks. , 1993, Ergonomics.

[8]  F A Fathallah,et al.  Maximum forces sustained during various methods of exiting commercial tractors, trailers and trucks. , 2000, Applied ergonomics.

[9]  P. Devita,et al.  Effect of landing stiffness on joint kinetics and energetics in the lower extremity. , 1992, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[10]  J. Dufek,et al.  Biomechanical Factors Associated with Injury During Landing in Jump Sports , 1991, Sports medicine.

[11]  D. Chaffin ON THE VALIDITY OF BIOMECHANICAL MODELS OF THE LOW-BACK FOR WEIGHT LIFTING ANALYSIS. , 1975 .

[12]  W. M. Keyserling,et al.  Preemployment strength testing , 1978 .

[13]  J L McNitt-Gray,et al.  Kinetics of the lower extremities during drop landings from three heights. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  P. Atkinson,et al.  Subfracture insult to the human cadaver patellofemoral joint produces occult injury , 1995, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[15]  A. S. Nicholson,et al.  Slipping, tripping and falling accidents to delivery drivers. , 1985, Ergonomics.

[16]  N Yoganandan,et al.  Axial impact biomechanics of the human foot-ankle complex. , 1997, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[17]  W C Hayes,et al.  The use of quantitative computed tomography to estimate risk of fracture of the hip from falls. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[18]  W. M. Keyserling,et al.  Preemployment strength testing: an updated position. , 1978, Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association.