Simple mechanisms of size distribution dynamics in crowded and uncrowded virtual monocultures

[1]  Ulf Dieckmann,et al.  The Geometry of Ecological Interactions: Simplifying Spatial Complexity , 2000 .

[2]  V. Grimm.  Ten years of individual-based modelling in ecology: what have we learned and what could we learn in the future? , 1999 .

[3]  Janusz Uchmański,et al.  What promotes persistence of a single population: an individual-based model , 1999 .

[4]  C. Bennington,et al.  Field tests of density-and frequency-dependent selection in Erigeron annuus (Compositae). , 1998, American journal of botany.

[5]  Jacob Weiner,et al.  Mechanisms determining the degree of size asymmetry in competition among plants , 1998, Oecologia.

[6]  R. Hunt,et al.  Components of relative growth rate and their interrelations in 59 temperate plant species , 1997 .

[7]  J Uchmański,et al.  Individual-based modelling in ecology: what makes the difference? , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[8]  Karin Frank,et al.  Pattern-oriented modelling in population ecology , 1996 .

[9]  Andrey B. Yastrebov,et al.  Different types of heterogeneity and plant competition in monospecific stands , 1996 .

[10]  Jacqueline McGlade,et al.  A coupled map lattice model of the growth of plant monocultures , 1996 .

[11]  S. Schwinning.  Decomposition Analysis of Competitive Symmetry and Size Structure Dynamics , 1996 .

[12]  Gordon A. Fox,et al.  Population dynamic consequences of competitive symmetry in annual plants , 1995 .

[13]  Jacob Weiner,et al.  On the Practice of Ecology , 1995 .

[14]  I. Terashima,et al.  Effects of Plant Density on Frequency Distributions of Plant Height in Chenopodium album Stands: Analysis Based on Continuous Monitoring of Height-growth of Individual Plants , 1995 .

[15]  Volker Grimm,et al.  MATHEMATICAL MODELS AND UNDERSTANDING IN ECOLOGY , 1994 .

[16]  Tomasz Wyszomirski,et al.  Competitive Asymmetry Reduces Spatial Effects on Size-Structure Dynamics in Plant Populations , 1994 .

[17]  L. R. Benjamin,et al.  A Model for Plant and Crop Growth, Allowing for Competition for Light by the use of Potential and Restricted Projected Crown Zone Areas , 1994 .

[18]  Janusz Uchmański,et al.  Ecological Systems are Not Dynamic Systems: Some Consequences of Individual Variability , 1994 .

[19]  M. Yokozawa,et al.  Effects of Physiological and Environmental Variations on Size-Structure Dynamics in Plant Populations , 1994 .

[20]  O P Judson,et al.  The rise of the individual-based model in ecology. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[21]  L. Benjamin.  Experimental Discrimination Between Contrasting Models of Neighbourhood Competition , 1993 .

[22]  F. Bazzaz,et al.  THE GENETIC COMPONENT IN PLANT SIZE HIERARCHIES: NORMS OF REACTION TO DENSITY IN A POLYGONUM SPECIES' , 1993 .

[23]  G. Bonan.  Analysis of neighborhood competition among annual plants: implications of a plant growth model , 1993 .

[24]  Toshihiko Hara,et al.  A Canopy Photosynthesis Model for the Dynamics of Size Structure and Self-thinning in Plant Populations , 1992 .

[25]  Tomasz Wyszomirski,et al.  Detecting and displaying size bimodality: Kurtosis, skewness and bimodalizable distributions , 1992 .

[26]  T. Hara.  Effects of the Mode of Competition on Stationary Size Distribution in Plant Populations , 1992 .

[27]  T. Czárán,et al.  Spatiotemporal dynamic models of plant populations and communities. , 1992, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[28]  J. Latto,et al.  The Differentiation of Animal Body Weights , 1992 .

[29]  D. DeAngelis,et al.  Individual-Based Models and Approaches in Ecology , 1992 .

[30]  Gordon B. Bonan,et al.  Density Effects on the Size Structure of Annual Plant Populations: An Indication of Neighbourhood Competition , 1991 .

[31]  Lawrence B. Slobodkin,et al.  A Critique for Ecology , 1991 .

[32]  N. C. Kenkel,et al.  Spatial Competition Models for Plant Populations , 1991 .

[33]  J. Weiner,et al.  Asymmetric competition in plant populations. , 1990, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[34]  H. Lambers,et al.  Carbon and nitrogen economy of 24 wild species differing in relative growth rate. , 1990, Plant physiology.

[35]  J. Andel,et al.  Ecological significance of variability in growth rate and plant productivity , 1990 .

[36]  H. Lambers,et al.  Causes and consequences of variation in growth rate and productivity of higher plants , 1990 .

[37]  Geoffrey M. Henebry,et al.  Inferring Process from Pattern in Natural CommunitiesCan we understand what we see , 1989 .

[38]  Norman L. Christensen,et al.  Population Dynamics in Loblolly Pine Stands: Changes in Skewness and Size Inequality , 1989 .

[39]  T. Miller,et al.  Local Density Variation may Mimic Effects of Asymmetric Competition on Plant Size Variability , 1989 .

[40]  M. Geber.  Interplay of Morphology and Development on Size Inequality: A Polygonum Greenhouse Study , 1989 .

[41]  Michael J. Reiss,et al.  The allometry of growth and reproduction , 1989 .

[42]  P. Keddy,et al.  The relationship between relative growth rate and sensitivity to nutrient stress in twenty-eight species of emergent macrophytes , 1988 .

[43]  Gordon B. Bonan,et al.  The size structure of theoretical plant populations: spatial patterns and neighborhood effects , 1988 .

[44]  D. DeAngelis,et al.  New Computer Models Unify Ecological TheoryComputer simulations show that many ecological patterns can be explained by interactions among individual organisms , 1988 .

[45]  L. R. Benjamin.  A single equation to quantify the hierarchy in plant size induced by competition within monocultures , 1988 .

[46]  S. Magnussen,et al.  Asymmetric, two-sided competition in even-aged monocultures of red pine , 1988 .

[47]  T. Hara,et al.  Dynamics of size structure in plant populations. , 1988, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[48]  J. Wilson,et al.  The effect of initial advantage on the course of plant competition , 1988 .

[49]  A. Watkinson,et al.  Plant population ecology : the 28th Symposium of the British Ecological Society, Sussex, 1987 , 1988 .

[50]  Michael A. Huston,et al.  Size Bimodality in Monospecific Populations: A Critical Review of Potential Mechanisms , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[51]  Donald L. DeAngelis,et al.  Effects of growth rates in models of size distribution formation in plants and animals , 1987 .

[52]  J. Uchmański,et al.  Resource partitioning among unequal competitors , 1987 .

[53]  L. R. Benjamin,et al.  Sources of Variation and Measures of Variability in Even-aged Stands of Plants , 1986 .

[54]  D. Ehrhardt,et al.  Light-Depedent Dominance and Suppression in Experimental Radish Populations , 1986 .

[55]  Jacob Weiner,et al.  Size variability and competition in plant monocultures , 1986 .

[56]  John L. Harper,et al.  Ecology: Individuals, Populations and Communities , 1986 .

[57]  M. Kimmel.  Does competition for food imply skewness , 1986 .

[58]  M. Huston.  Size Bimodality in Plant Populations an Alternative Hypothesis , 1986 .

[59]  T. Hara.  Growth of Individuals in Plant Populations , 1986 .

[60]  L. Firbank,et al.  A model of interference within plant monocultures , 1985 .

[61]  J. Uchmański,et al.  Differentiation and frequency distributions of body weights in plants and animals. , 1985, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[62]  Jacob Weiner,et al.  Size Hierarchies in Experimental Populations of Annual Plants , 1985 .

[63]  T. Hara.  Dynamics of stand structure in plant monocultures , 1984 .

[64]  T. Hara.  A stochastic model and the moment dynamics of the growth and size distribution in plant populations , 1984 .

[65]  D. Rabinowitz,et al.  Factors Affecting Frequency Distributions of Plant Mass: The Absence of Dominance and Suppression in Competing Monocultures of Festuca Paradoxa , 1983 .

[66]  D. Gates,et al.  Skewness reversal of distribution of stem diameter in plantations of Pinus radiata , 1983 .

[67]  D. Wethey.  Intrapopulation variation in growth of sessile organisms: natural populations of the intertidal barnacle Balanus balanoides , 1983 .

[68]  N. Britton.  A model for suppression and dominance in trees , 1982 .

[69]  D. Gates.  Competition and skewness in plantations , 1982 .

[70]  David J. Gates,et al.  Negative skewness and negative correlations in spatial competition models , 1981 .

[71]  Peter J. Diggle,et al.  Competition for Light in a Plant Monoculture Modelled as a Spatial Stochastic Process , 1981 .

[72]  R. McMurtrie.  Suppression and dominance of trees with overlapping crowns , 1981 .

[73]  D. P. Aikman,et al.  A Model for Growth and Self-thinning in Even-aged Monocultures of Plants , 1980 .

[74]  DEBORAH RABINOWITZ,et al.  Bimodal distributions of seedling weight in relation to density of Festuca paradoxa Desv. , 1979, Nature.

[75]  P. Marks,et al.  STAND STRUCTURE AND ALLOMETRY OF TREES DURING SELF-THINNING OF PURE STANDS , 1978 .

[76]  D J Gates,et al.  Bimodality in even-aged plant monocultures. , 1978, Journal of theoretical biology.

[77]  J. Harper.  Population Biology of Plants , 1979 .

[78]  Władysław Krajewski,et al.  Correspondence principle and growth of science , 1977 .

[79]  Roderick Hunt,et al.  Relative growth-rate: its range and adaptive significance in a local flora. , 1975 .

[80]  E. D. Ford,et al.  Competition and stand structure in some even-aged plant monocultures , 1975 .

[81]  A. L. Koch,et al.  The logarithm in biology. II. Distributions simulating the log-normal. , 1969, Journal of theoretical biology.

[82]  F. J. Richards.  The Quantitative Analysis of Growth , 1969 .

[83]  J. Aitchison,et al.  The Lognormal Distribution. , 1958 .