Removing an intersubject variance component in a general linear model improves multiway factoring of event‐related spectral perturbations in group EEG studies

Linear statistical models are used very effectively to assess task‐related differences in EEG power spectral analyses. Mixed models, in particular, accommodate more than one variance component in a multisubject study, where many trials of each condition of interest are measured on each subject. Generally, intra‐ and intersubject variances are both important to determine correct standard errors for inference on functions of model parameters, but it is often assumed that intersubject variance is the most important consideration in a group study. In this article, we show that, under common assumptions, estimates of some functions of model parameters, including estimates of task‐related differences, are properly tested relative to the intrasubject variance component only. A substantial gain in statistical power can arise from the proper separation of variance components when there is more than one source of variability. We first develop this result analytically, then show how it benefits a multiway factoring of spectral, spatial, and temporal components from EEG data acquired in a group of healthy subjects performing a well‐studied response inhibition task. Hum Brain Mapp, 2013. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  Yoshiharu Yamamoto,et al.  Single-trial EEG Power and Phase Dynamics Associated with Voluntary Response Inhibition , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  Michael A. Kraut,et al.  Space–time–frequency analysis of EEG data using within-subject statistical tests followed by sequential PCA , 2009, NeuroImage.

[3]  Robert J. Barry,et al.  Response priming in the Go/NoGo task: The N2 reflects neither inhibition nor conflict , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[4]  T. Ferrée,et al.  Spherical Splines and Average Referencing in Scalp Electroencephalography , 2006, Brain Topography.

[5]  Joseph Dien,et al.  Progressing towards a consensus on PCA of ERPs , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[6]  John D. Storey The positive false discovery rate: a Bayesian interpretation and the q-value , 2003 .

[7]  E. Donchin,et al.  Localization of the event-related potential novelty response as defined by principal components analysis. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[8]  K. J. Bruin,et al.  Response priming in a go/nogo task: do we have to explain the go/nogo N2 effect in terms of response activation instead of inhibition? , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[9]  D. Tucker,et al.  Regulating action: alternating activation of midline frontal and motor cortical networks , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[10]  B. Rockstroh,et al.  Statistical control of artifacts in dense array EEG/MEG studies. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[11]  E. Donchin,et al.  A componential analysis of the ERP elicited by novel events using a dense electrode array. , 1999, Psychophysiology.

[12]  M. Kenward,et al.  Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood. , 1997, Biometrics.

[13]  E. Jodo,et al.  Relation of a negative ERP component to response inhibition in a Go/No-go task. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[14]  Josef Schmee,et al.  Analysis of Messy Data, Volume I: Designed Experiments , 1985 .

[15]  D. E. Johnson,et al.  Analysis of Messy Data Volume I: Designed Experiments , 1985 .

[16]  E. Donchin,et al.  A multivariate approach to the analysis of average evoked potentials. , 1966, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.

[17]  J. Horn A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis , 1965, Psychometrika.

[18]  H. Kaiser The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis , 1958 .

[19]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[20]  Dallas E. Johnson,et al.  Analysis of messy data , 1992 .

[21]  G. Casella,et al.  Statistical Inference , 2003, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[22]  S. R. Searle Linear Models , 1971 .