Mitigation choices impact carbon budget size compatible with low temperature goals

Global-mean temperature increase is roughly proportional to cumulative emissions of carbon-dioxide (CO2). Limiting global warming to any level thus implies a finite CO2 budget. Due to geophysical uncertainties, the size of such budgets can only be expressed in probabilistic terms and is further influenced by non-CO2 emissions. We here explore how societal choices related to energy demand and specific mitigation options influence the size of carbon budgets for meeting a given temperature objective. We find that choices that exclude specific CO2 mitigation technologies (like Carbon Capture and Storage) result in greater costs, smaller compatible CO2 budgets until 2050, but larger CO2 budgets until 2100. Vice versa, choices that lead to a larger CO2 mitigation potential result in CO2 budgets until 2100 that are smaller but can be met at lower costs. In most cases, these budget variations can be explained by the amount of non-CO2 mitigation that is carried out in conjunction with CO2, and associated global carbon prices that also drive mitigation of non-CO2 gases. Budget variations are of the order of 10% around their central value. In all cases, limiting warming to below 2 °C thus still implies that CO2 emissions need to be reduced rapidly in the coming decades.

[1]  R. Knutti,et al.  The legacy of our CO2 emissions: a clash of scientific facts, politics and ethics , 2015, Climatic Change.

[2]  M. Ha-Duong,et al.  Climate change 2014 - Mitigation of climate change , 2015 .

[3]  O. Edenhofer.  Climate change 2014 : mitigation of climate change : Working Group III contribution to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2015 .

[4]  J. Rogelj,et al.  Disentangling the effects of CO2 and short-lived climate forcer mitigation , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Persistent growth of CO2 emissions and implications for reaching climate targets , 2014 .

[6]  G. Luderer,et al.  Economic impacts of alternative greenhouse gas emission metrics: a model-based assessment , 2014, Climatic Change.

[7]  Keywan Riahi,et al.  Air-pollution emission ranges consistent with the representative concentration pathways , 2014 .

[8]  Sonja J. Vermeulen,et al.  Climate change, food security and small-scale producers: Analysis of findings of the Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) , 2014 .

[9]  R. Knutti,et al.  Implications of potentially lower climate sensitivity on climate projections and policy , 2014 .

[10]  M. Allen,et al.  The role of short-lived climate pollutants in meeting temperature goals , 2013 .

[11]  Myles R. Allen,et al.  Constraining the Ratio of Global Warming to Cumulative CO2 Emissions Using CMIP5 Simulations , 2013 .

[12]  Elmar Kriegler,et al.  Economic mitigation challenges: how further delay closes the door for achieving climate targets , 2013 .

[13]  Brian C. O'Neill,et al.  2020 emissions levels required to limit warming to below 2 °C , 2013 .

[14]  Nebojsa Nakicenovic,et al.  Climate policies can help resolve energy security and air pollution challenges , 2013, Climatic Change.

[15]  D. McCollum,et al.  Probabilistic cost estimates for climate change mitigation , 2013, Nature.

[16]  M. Raupach,et al.  Offsetting methane emissions - An alternative to emission equivalence metrics , 2013 .

[17]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis , 2013 .

[18]  Michael Obersteiner,et al.  Implications of alternative metrics for global mitigation costs and greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture , 2013, Climatic Change.

[19]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  The global carbon budget 1959-2011 , 2012 .

[20]  S. Solomon,et al.  Cumulative carbon as a policy framework for achieving climate stabilization , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[21]  Shonali Pachauri,et al.  Demographic change and carbon dioxide emissions , 2012, The Lancet.

[22]  M. Allen,et al.  Equivalence of greenhouse-gas emissions for peak temperature limits , 2012 .

[23]  Joeri Rogelj,et al.  Global warming under old and new scenarios using IPCC climate sensitivity range estimates , 2012 .

[24]  J. Kok,et al.  The physics of wind-blown sand and dust , 2012, Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society.

[25]  N. Nakicenovic,et al.  Global Energy Assessment – Toward a Sustainable Future , 2012 .

[26]  Nicholas Stern,et al.  Uncertainty in science and its role in climate policy , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[27]  Tom M. L. Wigley,et al.  Emulating atmosphere-ocean and carbon cycle models with a simpler model, MAGICC6 – Part 2: Applications , 2011 .

[28]  T. Wigley,et al.  Emulating coupled atmosphere-ocean and carbon cycle models with a simpler model, MAGICC6 - Part 1: Model description and calibration , 2011 .

[29]  M. Allen,et al.  Cumulative carbon emissions, emissions floors and short-term rates of warming: implications for policy , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[30]  G. Toth,et al.  Potentials and Costs for Greenhouse Gas Mitigation in Annex I Countries: Methodology , 2009 .

[31]  H. Damon Matthews,et al.  The proportionality of global warming to cumulative carbon emissions , 2009, Nature.

[32]  N. Meinshausen,et al.  Greenhouse-gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2 °C , 2009, Nature.

[33]  N. Meinshausen,et al.  Warming caused by cumulative carbon emissions towards the trillionth tonne , 2009, Nature.

[34]  A. Weaver,et al.  Setting cumulative emissions targets to reduce the risk of dangerous climate change , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  N. Nakicenovic,et al.  Scenarios of long-term socio-economic and environmental development under climate stabilization , 2007 .

[36]  Jan S Fuglestvedt,et al.  Comparing the climate effect of emissions of short- and long-lived climate agents , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[37]  Vincent R. Gray.  Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis Summary for Policymakers , 2007 .

[38]  D. Johansson,et al.  Non-CO2 Greenhouse Gases in National Climate Policies: A reassessment of the Comprehensive Approach. , 2005 .

[39]  Leo Schrattenholzer,et al.  MESSAGE-MACRO: Linking an energy supply model with a macroeconomic module and solving it iteratively , 2000 .