Using GEMANOVA to explore the pattern generating properties of the Delta‐Notch model

In the area of systems biology, increasingly complex models are developed to approximate biological processes. The complexity makes it difficult to derive the properties of such models analytically. An alternative to analytical considerations is to use multivariate statistical methods to reveal essential properties of the models. In this paper it is shown how the properties of a relatively complex mathematical model for describing cell‐pattern development, the Delta‐Notch model, can be explored by means of statistical analyses of data generated from the model. ANOVA is a well‐known and one of the most commonly used methods for analyzing data from designed experiments, but it turns out that it is not always appropriate for finding and exploring higher‐order interactions. For this purpose a multiplicative alternative—GEMANOVA—was used in the present paper for studying the Delta‐Notch model, for which the properties depend on higher order interactions between the model parameters. It is shown here how a forward selection strategy combined with bootstrapping can be used to identify GEMANOVA models with reasonable fit to the data, and it is demonstrated how new insight about the Delta‐Notch model can be gained from interpreting the GEMANOVA output. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  C. Tomlin,et al.  Symbolic reachable set computation of piecewise affine hybrid automata and its application to biological modelling: Delta-Notch protein signalling. , 2004, Systems biology.

[2]  A. M. Turing,et al.  The chemical basis of morphogenesis , 1952, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences.

[3]  R. Bro,et al.  PARAFAC and missing values , 2005 .

[4]  M. Kenward,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 2007 .

[5]  Dominique Bertrand,et al.  The genotype-phenotype relationship in multicellular pattern-generating models - the neglected role of pattern descriptors , 2009, BMC Systems Biology.

[6]  David E. Booth,et al.  Multi-Way Analysis: Applications in the Chemical Sciences , 2005, Technometrics.

[7]  P. Maini,et al.  Pattern formation by lateral inhibition with feedback: a mathematical model of delta-notch intercellular signalling. , 1996, Journal of theoretical biology.

[8]  Tormod Næs,et al.  The importance of functional marginality in model building — A case study , 2007 .

[9]  Ø. Langsrud,et al.  Analysis of Megavariate Data in Functional Genomics , 2009 .

[10]  Rasmus Bro,et al.  Exploring complex interactions in designed data using GEMANOVA. Color changes in fresh beef during storage , 2002 .

[11]  Margaret J. Robertson,et al.  Design and Analysis of Experiments , 2006, Handbook of statistics.

[12]  G. Ehrlich,et al.  The Metabolic Basis Of Inherited Disease. , 1973 .

[13]  Kristian Hovde Liland,et al.  Testing effects of experimental design factors using multi-way analysis , 2009 .

[14]  D. B. Hibbert,et al.  Generalized multiplicative analysis of variance of kill kinetics data of antibacterial agents , 2008 .

[15]  Rasmus Bro,et al.  Multi-way Analysis with Applications in the Chemical Sciences , 2004 .

[16]  Charles R.scriver,et al.  The Metabolic basis of inherited disease , 1989 .

[17]  M. Peschel,et al.  The Predator-Prey Model: Do We Live in a Volterra World? , 1986 .

[18]  Rasmus Bro,et al.  MULTI-WAY ANALYSIS IN THE FOOD INDUSTRY Models, Algorithms & Applications , 1998 .

[19]  F. Rombouts,et al.  Modeling of the Bacterial Growth Curve , 1990, Applied and environmental microbiology.