Computerized Adaptive Testing With Polytomous Items
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] F. Baker. Equating Tests Under the Graded Response Model , 1992 .
[2] J. Mcbride,et al. Reliability and Validity of Adaptive Ability Tests in a Military Setting , 1983 .
[3] David J. Weiss,et al. Final Report: Computerized Adaptive Measurement of Achievement and Ability , 1985 .
[4] David Thissen,et al. A taxonomy of item response models , 1986 .
[5] Mark D. Reckase,et al. The Difficulty of Test Items That Measure More Than One Ability , 1985 .
[6] F. Samejima. Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores , 1968 .
[7] Procedures for Criterion Referenced Tailored Testing. , 1981 .
[8] Betty A. Bergstrom,et al. The Effect of Review on Student Ability and Test Efficiency for Computerized Adaptive Tests , 1992 .
[9] D. Andrich. A rating formulation for ordered response categories , 1978 .
[10] E. Muraki. A GENERALIZED PARTIAL CREDIT MODEL: APPLICATION OF AN EM ALGORITHM , 1992 .
[11] R. J. De Ayala,et al. A Comparison of the Partial Credit and Graded Response Models in Computerized Adaptive Testing , 1992 .
[12] David J. Weiss,et al. A Comparison of IRT-Based Adaptive Mastery Testing and a Sequential Mastery Testing Procedure , 1983 .
[13] David J. Weiss,et al. Final Report: Computer-Based Measurement of Intellectual Capabilities , 1983 .
[14] G. Masters,et al. Banking Non-Dichotomously Scored Items , 1986 .
[15] Effects of Variations in Item Step Values on Item and Test Information in the Partial Credit Model , 1987 .
[16] David J. Weiss,et al. An Adaptive Testing Strategy for Achievement Test Batteries. , 1977 .
[17] Robert Cudeck,et al. Adaptive and Conventional Versions of the DAT: The First Complete Test Battery Comparison , 1989 .
[18] Eiji Muraki,et al. Fitting a Polytomous Item Response Model to Likert-Type Data , 1990 .
[19] David J. Weiss,et al. Final Report: Computerized Adaptive Ability Testing, April 1981 , 1981 .
[20] D. Andrich. Application of a Psychometric Rating Model to Ordered Categories Which Are Scored with Successive Integers , 1978 .
[21] Computerized Adaptive Measurements of Attitudes. , 1990 .
[22] Michael V. LeVine,et al. Measuring the Difference Between Two Models , 1992 .
[23] Vern W. Urry,et al. TAILORED TESTING: A SUCCESSFUL APPLICATION OF LATENT TRAIT THEORY* , 1977 .
[24] William R. Koch,et al. An Investigation of Procedures for Computerized Adaptive Testing Using Partial Credit Scoring , 1989 .
[25] David J. Weiss,et al. Improving Measurement Quality and Efficiency with Adaptive Testing , 1982 .
[26] W.R. Koch. Likert Scaling Using the Graded Response Latent Trait Model , 1983 .
[27] Mark D. Reckase,et al. TECHNICAL GUIDELINES FOR ASSESSING COMPUTERIZED ADAPTIVE TESTS , 1984 .
[28] R. J. De Ayala. The nominal response model in computerized adaptive testing , 1992 .
[29] David Thissen,et al. A response model for multiple choice items , 1984 .
[30] Barbara G. Dodd,et al. Computerized Adaptive Testing Using the Partial Credit Model: Effects Of Item Pool Characteristics and Different Stopping Rules , 1993 .
[31] Wagner A. Kamakura,et al. Tailored Interviewing: An Application of Item Response Theory for Personality Measurement , 1989 .
[32] R. J. Ayala. A Comparison of the Nominal Response Model and the Three-Parameter Logistic Model in Computerized Adaptive Testing , 1989 .
[33] J. Rost. Measuring Attitudes With a Threshold Model Drawing on a Traditional Scaling Concept , 1988 .
[34] E. Muraki. A Generalized Partial Credit Model: Application of an EM Algorithm , 1992 .
[35] Item and Scale Information Functions for the Successive Intervals Rasch Model , 1994 .
[36] Anthony R. Zara,et al. Procedures for Selecting Items for Computerized Adaptive Tests. , 1989 .
[37] Wagner A. Kamakura,et al. Measuring Consumer Attitudes toward the Marketplace with Tailored Interviews , 1989 .
[38] Ken Isaacson,et al. I I , 1982 .
[39] R. Darrell Bock,et al. Estimating item parameters and latent ability when responses are scored in two or more nominal categories , 1972 .
[40] Barbara G. Dodd,et al. Operational Characteristics of Adaptive Testing Procedures Using the Graded Response Model , 1989 .
[41] Mark D. Reckase,et al. Computer Applications to Ability Testing , 1980 .
[42] B. Wright,et al. The essential process in a family of measurement models , 1984 .
[43] B. G. Dodd. The Effect of Item Selection Procedure and Stepsize on Computerized Adaptive Attitude Measurement Using the Rating Scale Model , 1990 .
[44] G. Masters. A rasch model for partial credit scoring , 1982 .
[45] R. D. Bock,et al. Adaptive EAP Estimation of Ability in a Microcomputer Environment , 1982 .
[46] Mark D. Reckase,et al. Adaptive Testing: The Evolution of a Good Idea , 1989 .
[47] David Thissen,et al. A Response Model for Multiple Choice Items. Psychometric Technical Report No. 1. , 1983 .
[48] Melvin R. Novick,et al. Some latent train models and their use in inferring an examinee's ability , 1966 .
[49] Robert J. Mislevy,et al. Test Theory for A New Generation of Tests , 1994 .
[50] An Investigation of Procedures for Computerized Adaptive Testing Using the Successive Intervals Rasch Model , 1995 .
[51] Frank B. Baker,et al. Equating Tests Under The Nominal Response Model , 1993 .
[52] An Introduction to Polytomous Item Response Theory Models. , 1993 .
[53] Anthony R. Zara,et al. A Comparison of Procedures for Content-Sensitive Item Selection in Computerized Adaptive Tests. , 1991 .