Augmented Reality and Mobile Learning in a Smart Urban Park: Pupils’ Perceptions of the EduPARK Game

The EduPARK game is developed under a game-based learning methodology. It is designed for outdoor learning settings by employing geocaching principles and mobile Augmented Reality technologies. The game aims to develop users’ authentic and autonomous learning about diverse interdisciplinary themes in a smart urban park. It integrates learning guides for different target groups of basic education. The purpose of this paper is to present the game prototype development, which followed a design-based research approach. The evaluation of the game involved 74 pupils from two school levels (aged 9–10 and 13–14). They explored the game and their reactions were registered. Focus groups were conducted at the end of the experience. The evaluation allowed identifying positive characteristics of the game, such as immediate feedback and collaborative dynamics. Some questions included in the learning guides were perceived as difficult to understand and also some features came out to be considered for future improvements.

[1]  João Amado.  Manual de investigação qualitativa em educação , 2014 .

[2]  Jorge Bacca,et al.  Augmented Reality Trends in Education: A Systematic Review of Research and Applications , 2014, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[3]  D. Jonassen.  Thinking Technology: Toward a Constructivist Design Model , 1994 .

[4]  Chi-Chang Chen,et al.  Effects of an augmented reality-based educational game on students' learning achievements and attitudes in real-world observations , 2016, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[5]  Chris Dede,et al.  EcoMOBILE: Integrating augmented reality and probeware with environmental education field trips , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[6]  Giasemi N. Vavoula,et al.  Literature Review in Mobile Technologies and Learning , 2004 .

[7]  Matt Dunleavy,et al.  Design Principles for Augmented Reality Learning , 2014 .

[8]  T. Anderson,et al.  Design-Based Research , 2012 .

[9]  Iulian Radu,et al.  Augmented reality in education: a meta-review and cross-media analysis , 2014, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[10]  Hirokazu Kato,et al.  Augmented Reality Learning Experiences: Survey of Prototype Design and Evaluation , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.

[11]  Murat Akçayır,et al.  Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review of the literature , 2017 .

[12]  Jody Clarke-Midura,et al.  Better Learning in Games: A Balanced Design Lens for a New Generation of Learning Games , 2015 .

[13]  Roy Ballantyne,et al.  Nature-based Excursions: School Students' Perceptions of Learning in Natural Environments , 2002 .

[14]  Davinia Hernández Leo,et al.  Augmenting Reality and Formality of Informal and Non-Formal Settings to Enhance Blended Learning , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.

[15]  R. Ballantyne,et al.  Environmental awareness, interests and motives of botanic gardens visitors: Implications for interpretive practice , 2008 .

[16]  Larry Katz,et al.  The Use of Focus Group Methodology in Education: Some Theoretical and Practical Considerations, 5(3) , 2001 .

[17]  Monica Divitini,et al.  Technology-enhanced Smart City Learning: a Systematic Mapping of the Literature , 2015, IxD&A.

[18]  Iulian Radu,et al.  Why should my students use AR? A comparative review of the educational impacts of augmented-reality , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR).

[19]  S. A. Becker,et al.  NMC Horizon Report: 2016 Higher Education Edition , 2015 .