An Investigation of a Satiation Process in the Reversible Perspective of Revolving Skeletal Shapes

A technique for studying a satiation process is described, which is claimed to have many advantages over the older methods. A skeletal wire cube is rotated at 1 rev. per sec., and the time taken for the first apparent reversal of direction to occur is measured and called the “satiation period.” It is a much longer period than the mean period of subsequent reversals. This is due to the fact that the situation is one of biased ambiguity; biased by the cues to depth and thus to the true perspective. Using this measure we have shown:— (1) That the effect is predominantly central. (2) That after satiation has occurred, reversing the cube's direction of rotation induces a longer than normal satiation period. (3) There is no transfer of satiation to other types of static or mobile figure nor to other spatial locations. (4) Satiation time is largely independent of brightness and colour. (5) Köhler's theory of satiation is supported but it is given a neuronal basis rather than a basis in a non-neuronal, electrolytic type of cortical conduction.

[1]  A. Wolters,et al.  Dynamics in Psychology , 1943, Nature.

[2]  C. Osgood,et al.  A new interpretation of figural after-effects. , 1952, Psychological review.

[3]  H. H. Spitz Neural Satiation in the Spiral Aftereffect and Similar Movement Aftereffects , 1958 .

[4]  R. Day On interocular transfer and the central origin of visual after-effects. , 1958, American Journal of Psychology.

[5]  Myron Yanoff,et al.  Textbook of Ophthalmology , 1938, The Indian Medical Gazette.

[6]  Carlson Vr Aftereffect of a moving pattern. , 1959 .

[7]  P. McEwen Figural after-effects , 1958 .

[8]  J. Langdon,et al.  The Perception of a Changing Shape* , 1951 .

[9]  H. Wallach,et al.  The kinetic depth effect. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  S. Gunnar O. Johansson,et al.  Configurations in event perception : an experimental study , 1951 .

[11]  P. A. Adams,et al.  The effect of past experience on the perspective reversal of a tridimensional figure. , 1954, The American journal of psychology.

[12]  Eure Sp,et al.  Reversible figures and eye-movements. , 1956 .

[13]  K. Lashley,et al.  An examination of the electrical field theory of cerebral integration. , 1951, Psychological review.

[14]  P. A. Stewart,et al.  The effect on visual perception of stimulating the brain with polarizing currents. , 1957, The American journal of psychology.

[15]  M. Critchleey [Parietal lobes]. , 1953, Giornale di psichiatria e di neuropatologia.

[16]  V R FISICHELLI Reversible perspective in Lissajous figures; some theoretical considerations. , 1947, The American journal of psychology.

[17]  Fisichelli Vr Reversible perspective in Lissajous figures; some theoretical considerations. , 1947 .

[18]  J. Hochberg Figure-ground reversal as a function of visual satiation. , 1950 .

[19]  J. Deutsch The statistical theory of figural after-effects and acuity. , 1956, British journal of psychology.

[20]  C. H. Griffitts,et al.  The Influence of Complexity on the Fluctuations of the Illusions of Reversible Perspective , 1931 .

[21]  K. T. Brown,et al.  Rate of apparent change in a dynamic ambiguous figure as a function of observation-time. , 1955, The American journal of psychology.

[22]  H. P. Bowditch,et al.  Optical Illusions of Motion , 1882, The Journal of physiology.

[23]  L. Cohen,et al.  Rate of Apparent Change of a Necker Cube as a Function of Prior Stimulation , 1959 .

[24]  W. Köhler Dynamics in Psychology , 1940 .

[25]  W. Mcdougall,et al.  III.—THE PHYSIOLOGICAL FACTORS OF THE ATTENTION-PROCESS (III.) , 1903 .

[26]  The satiational theory of the figural after-effect. , 1948, The American journal of psychology.

[27]  Carlson Vr Satiation in a reversible perspective figure. , 1953 .

[28]  R. Sperry,et al.  Visual pattern perception following sub-pial slicing and tantalum wire implantations in the visual cortex. , 1955, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[29]  Day Rh On interocular transfer and the central origin of visual after-effects. , 1958 .

[30]  J. Deutsch A theory of shape recognition. , 1955, British journal of psychology.

[31]  S. Duke-Elder,et al.  Textbook of Ophthalmology , 1950 .

[32]  K. M. Miller,et al.  Visual Illusion and Figural After-Effect, with and without Fixation , 1955 .

[33]  H. Wallach,et al.  Figural aftereffects; an investigation of visual processes. , 1944 .

[34]  J. Gibson,et al.  Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of curved lines. , 1933 .

[35]  J. C. Flügel,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF ATTENTION IN ILLUSIONS OF REVERSIBLE PERSPECTIVE , 1913 .