Measuring Video QoE from Encrypted Traffic

Tracking and maintaining satisfactory QoE for video streaming services is becoming a greater challenge for mobile network operators than ever before. Downloading and watching video content on mobile devices is currently a growing trend among users, that is causing a demand for higher bandwidth and better provisioning throughout the network infrastructure. At the same time, popular demand for privacy has led many online streaming services to adopt end-to-end encryption, leaving providers with only a handful of indicators for identifying QoE issues. In order to address these challenges, we propose a novel methodology for detecting video streaming QoE issues from encrypted traffic. We develop predictive models for detecting different levels of QoE degradation that is caused by three key influence factors, i.e. stalling, the average video quality and the quality variations. The models are then evaluated on the production network of a large scale mobile operator, where we show that despite encryption our methodology is able to accurately detect QoE problems with 72\%-92\% accuracy, while even higher performance is achieved when dealing with cleartext traffic

[1]  Srinivasan Seshan,et al.  Developing a predictive model of quality of experience for internet video , 2013, SIGCOMM.

[2]  Sujit Dey,et al.  User Experience Modeling for DASH Video , 2013, 2013 20th International Packet Video Workshop.

[3]  Bruno Sinopoli,et al.  A Control-Theoretic Approach for Dynamic Adaptive Video Streaming over HTTP , 2015, Comput. Commun. Rev..

[4]  Ramesh K. Sitaraman,et al.  Video Stream Quality Impacts Viewer Behavior: Inferring Causality Using Quasi-Experimental Designs , 2012, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[5]  Shobha Venkataraman,et al.  Prometheus: toward quality-of-experience estimation for mobile apps from passive network measurements , 2014, HotMobile.

[6]  Jaideep Chandrashekar,et al.  Predicting user dissatisfaction with Internet application performance at end-hosts , 2013, 2013 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[7]  Vijay Erramilli,et al.  Is there a case for mobile phone content pre-staging? , 2013, CoNEXT.

[8]  Michael Seufert,et al.  Assessing effect sizes of influence factors towards a QoE model for HTTP adaptive streaming , 2014, 2014 Sixth International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX).

[9]  Tobias Hoßfeld,et al.  Passive YouTube QoE Monitoring for ISPs , 2012, 2012 Sixth International Conference on Innovative Mobile and Internet Services in Ubiquitous Computing.

[10]  Josep Sanjuàs-Cuxart,et al.  Analysis of YouTube user experience from passive measurements , 2013, Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Network and Service Management (CNSM 2013).

[11]  E. S. Page CONTINUOUS INSPECTION SCHEMES , 1954 .

[12]  Phuoc Tran-Gia,et al.  Quantification of YouTube QoE via Crowdsourcing , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia.

[13]  Kuan-Ta Chen,et al.  OneClick: A Framework for Measuring Network Quality of Experience , 2009, IEEE INFOCOM 2009.

[14]  Xiapu Luo,et al.  Inferring the QoE of HTTP video streaming from user-viewing activities , 2011, W-MUST '11.

[15]  Jianfei Cai,et al.  Cross-Dimensional Perceptual Quality Assessment for Low Bit-Rate Videos , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia.

[16]  Rocky K. C. Chang,et al.  Measuring the quality of experience of HTTP video streaming , 2011, 12th IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on Integrated Network Management (IM 2011) and Workshops.

[17]  Lusheng Ji,et al.  Understanding the impact of network dynamics on mobile video user engagement , 2014, SIGMETRICS '14.

[18]  Walid Dabbous,et al.  Network characteristics of video streaming traffic , 2011, CoNEXT '11.

[19]  Blazej Lewcio,et al.  Video quality in next generation mobile networks — Perception of time-varying transmission , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Workshop Technical Committee on Communications Quality and Reliability (CQR).