The role of e-participation and open data in evidence-based policy decision making in local government

ABSTRACT The relationships between policies, their values, and outcomes are often difficult for citizens and policymakers to assess due to the complex nature of the policy lifecycle. With the opening of data by public administrations, there is now a greater opportunity for transparency, accountability, and evidence-based decision making in the policymaking process. In representative democracies, citizens rely on their elected representatives and local administrations to take policy decisions that address societal challenges and add value to their local communities. Citizens now have the opportunity to assess the impact and values of the policies introduced by their elected representatives and hold them accountable by utilizing historical open data that is publicly available. Using a qualitative case study in a UK Local Government Authority, this article examines how e-participation platforms and the use of open data can facilitate more factual, evidence-based, and transparent policy decision making and evaluation. From a theoretical stance, this article contributes to the policy lifecycle and e-participation literature. The article also offers valuable insights to public administrations on how open data can be utilized for evidence-based policy decision making and evaluation.

[1]  J. Olsen,et al.  The European Commission , 2020, The European Union.

[2]  D. Bobrow.  Computers and a normative model of the policy process , 1970 .

[3]  Charles O. Jones.  An introduction to the study of public policy , 1977 .

[4]  Warren E. Walker,et al.  Models in the Policy Process: Past, Present, and Future , 1982 .

[5]  Bart Kosko,et al.  Fuzzy Cognitive Maps , 1986, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[6]  S. Linder,et al.  Policy formulation and the challenge of conscious design , 1990 .

[7]  Donna Samuelsan,et al.  A conceptual framework for state policy development , 1990 .

[8]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[9]  D. Ryder.  The analysis of policy: understanding the process of policy development. , 1996, Addiction.

[10]  Leon A. Kappelman,et al.  A Comprehensive Model for Assessing the Quality and Productivity of the Information Systems Function: Toward a Theory for Information Systems Assessment , 1997 .

[11]  Peter Bridgman,et al.  The Australian Policy Handbook , 1998 .

[12]  Daniel A. Keim,et al.  Information Visualization and Visual Data Mining , 2002, IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph..

[13]  Miguel P Caldas,et al.  Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches , 2003 .

[14]  農林水産奨励会農林水産政策情報センター,et al.  The green book : appraisal and evaluation in central government , 2003 .

[15]  A. Twycross.  Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches Creswell John W Sage 320 £29 0761924426 0761924426 [Formula: see text]. , 2004, Nurse researcher.

[16]  Lee Komito,et al.  E-participation and Governance: Widening the net , 2005 .

[17]  A. Whyte.  EVALUATING HOW EPARTICIPATION CHANGES LOCAL DEMOCRACY , 2006 .

[18]  Richard Heeks,et al.  Adding clicks to bricks: a case study of e-commerce adoption by a Catalan small retailer , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[19]  Juliet M. Corbin,et al.  Basics of Qualitative Research (3rd ed.): Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory , 2008 .

[20]  Mark Exworthy,et al.  Policy to tackle the social determinants of health: using conceptual models to understand the policy process. , 2008, Health policy and planning.

[21]  M. D. Myers,et al.  Qualitative Research in Business & Management , 2008 .

[22]  R. Yin,et al.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods (4th ed. , 2009 .

[23]  Michael Howlett,et al.  Governance modes, policy regimes and operational plans: A multi-level nested model of policy instrument choice and policy design , 2009 .

[24]  T. Ramanathan.  The Role of Organisational Change Management in Offshore Outsourcing of Information Technology Services: Qualitative Case Studies from a Multinational Pharmaceutical Company , 2009 .

[25]  Karen E. Till,et al.  Ethnography and participant observation , 2010 .

[26]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Defining a Taxonomy for Research Areas on ICT for Governance and Policy Modelling , 2010, EGOV.

[27]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[28]  Evangelos Kalampokis,et al.  Combining Social and Government Open Data for Participatory Decision-Making , 2011, ePart.

[29]  Ojelanki K. Ngwenyama,et al.  The challenge of e-participation in the digital city: Exploring generational influences among community telecentre users , 2011, Telematics Informatics.

[30]  Shahizan Hassan,et al.  Electronic Participation in Malaysia , 2011 .

[31]  Michael Hallsworth,et al.  Policy-Making in the Real World , 2011 .

[32]  Luis F. Luna-Reyes,et al.  IT-enabled policy analysis: new technologies, sophisticated analysis and open data for better government decisions , 2012, dg.o '12.

[33]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Benefits, Adoption Barriers and Myths of Open Data and Open Government , 2012, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[34]  Bridget Rosewell,et al.  Complexity and agent based models in the policy process , 2012, Proceedings Title: Proceedings of the 2012 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC).

[35]  D. Helbing,et al.  Towards a global participatory platform , 2012, The European Physical Journal Special Topics.

[36]  Toramatsu Shintani,et al.  An e-Participation support system for regional communities based on linked open data, classification and clustering , 2012, 2012 IEEE 11th International Conference on Cognitive Informatics and Cognitive Computing.

[37]  Anne Fitzgerald,et al.  Implementing open licensing in government open data initiatives: a review of Australian government practice , 2013, OpenSym.

[38]  Maxat Kassen,et al.  A promising phenomenon of open data: A case study of the Chicago open data project , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[39]  Pierre Dragicevic,et al.  An Interaction Model for Visualizations Beyond The Desktop , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[40]  Mengchen Liu,et al.  A survey on information visualization: recent advances and challenges , 2014, The Visual Computer.

[41]  Kwan-Liu Ma,et al.  Big-Data Visualization , 2013, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[42]  M. Howlett,et al.  Tales From the Crypt , 2013 .

[43]  Yonghong Wu,et al.  Connecting citizens and local governments? Social media and interactivity in major U.S. cities , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[44]  Stacey D. Scott,et al.  Collaborative sensemaking on a digital tabletop and personal tablets: prioritization, comparisons, and tableaux , 2013, CHI.

[45]  Mary J. Newhart,et al.  Not by technology alone: The "analog" aspects of online public engagement in policymaking , 2014, Gov. Inf. Q..

[46]  Michael Howlett,et al.  From the ‘old’ to the ‘new’ policy design: design thinking beyond markets and collaborative governance , 2014 .

[47]  Laurence Brooks,et al.  Public Sector Information Systems (PSIs): How ICT can Bring Innovation into the Policymaking Process , 2014, ECIS.

[48]  Yuri Glikman,et al.  Infusing Innovation in the Policy Analysis and Evaluation Phases of the Policy Cycle: The Policy Compass Approach , 2014, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[49]  Lei Ren,et al.  Visual Analytics Towards Big Data , 2014 .

[50]  Simon Buckingham Shum,et al.  New Ways of Deliberating Online: An Empirical Comparison of Network and Threaded Interfaces for Online Discussion , 2014, ePart.

[51]  A. Clarke,et al.  Governments and Citizens Getting to Know Each Other? Open, Closed, and Big Data in Public Management Reform , 2014 .

[52]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  Design principles for improving the process of publishing open data , 2014 .

[53]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  Open data policies, their implementation and impact: A framework for comparison , 2014, Gov. Inf. Q..

[54]  S. Coleman,et al.  Deliberative Manoeuvres in the Digital Darkness: E-Democracy Policy in the UK , 2014 .

[55]  J. Kolman.  Software Developed by Research vs. Freedom of Information in EU (Open Access and Open Data) , 2014 .

[56]  Zahir Irani,et al.  Evaluating the use and impact of Web 2.0 technologies in local government , 2015, Gov. Inf. Q..

[57]  R. Axelrod.  Structure of decision : the cognitive maps of political elites , 2015 .