Is visual-based, online control of manual-aiming movements disturbed when adapting to new movement dynamics?

[1]  P. Fitts.  The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  F. M. Henry.  Absolute Error vs "E" in Target Accuracy. , 1975, Journal of motor behavior.

[3]  L. Carlton.  Processing visual feedback information for movement control. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  C. Dugas,et al.  On the type of information used to control and learn an aiming movement after moderate and extensive training , 1987 .

[5]  L. Proteau.  Chapter 4 On The Specificity of Learning and the Role of Visual Information for Movement Control , 1992 .

[6]  F A Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[7]  J. Lackner,et al.  Rapid adaptation to Coriolis force perturbations of arm trajectory. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  C Ghez,et al.  Proprioceptive control of interjoint coordination. , 1995, Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology.

[9]  R L Sainburg,et al.  Control of limb dynamics in normal subjects and patients without proprioception. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  D. Elliott,et al.  The role of target information on manual-aiming bias , 1995, Psychological Research.

[11]  J Paillard,et al.  Fast and slow feedback loops for the visual correction of spatial errors in a pointing task: a reappraisal. , 1996, Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology.

[12]  J. Temprado,et al.  Evidence Supporting the Importance of Peripheral Visual Information for the Directional Control of Aiming Movement. , 1997, Journal of motor behavior.

[13]  Michael A. Khan,et al.  The Effect of Practice on the Control of Rapid Aiming Movements: Evidence for an Interdependency between Programming and Feedback Processing , 1998 .

[14]  J. Kalaska,et al.  Comparison of variability of initial kinematics and endpoints of reaching movements , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  B. Day,et al.  Voluntary modification of automatic arm movements evoked by motion of a visual target , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  L. Proteau,et al.  The role of peripheral and central visual information for the directional control of manual aiming movements. , 1999, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[17]  John W. Krakauer,et al.  Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  R L Sainburg,et al.  Intersegmental dynamics are controlled by sequential anticipatory, error correction, and postural mechanisms. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  K. Boivin,et al.  Exploring the Limits of Peripheral Vision for the Control of Movement , 2000, Journal of motor behavior.

[20]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[21]  L. Proteau,et al.  Development of Multiple Movement Representations With Practice: Specificity Versus Flexibility , 2001, Journal of motor behavior.

[22]  R. Sainburg.  Evidence for a dynamic-dominance hypothesis of handedness , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  James L. Lyons,et al.  Optimal Control Strategies Under Different Feedback Schedules: Kinematic Evidence , 2002, Journal of motor behavior.

[24]  Daniel M Wolpert,et al.  Kinematics and Dynamics Are Not Represented Independently in Motor Working Memory: Evidence from an Interference Study , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  L. Proteau,et al.  On the Role of Visual Afferent Information for the Control of Aiming Movements Toward Targets of Different Sizes , 2002, Journal of motor behavior.

[26]  P. Bédard,et al.  On the role of peripheral visual afferent information for the control of rapid video-aiming movements. , 2003, Acta psychologica.

[27]  Michael A. Khan,et al.  Online Versus Offline Processing of Visual Feedback in the Production of Component Submovements , 2003, Journal of motor behavior.

[28]  Jinsung Wang,et al.  Interlimb transfer of novel inertial dynamics is asymmetrical. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  P. Bédard,et al.  On-line vs. off-line utilization of peripheral visual afferent information to ensure spatial accuracy of goal-directed movements , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[30]  J. Gordon,et al.  Accuracy of planar reaching movements , 1994, Experimental Brain Research.

[31]  L. Proteau.  Visual afferent information dominates other sources of afferent information during mixed practice of a video-aiming task , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[32]  Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Interaction of visual and proprioceptive feedback during adaptation of human reaching movements. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  Gavin P. Lawrence,et al.  Inferring online and offline processing of visual feedback in target-directed movements from kinematic data , 2006, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[34]  M. Kawato,et al.  Visual Feedback Is Not Necessary for the Learning of Novel Dynamics , 2007, PloS one.

[35]  Luc Proteau,et al.  Specificity of practice results from differences in movement planning strategies , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[36]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Specificity of Reflex Adaptation for Task-Relevant Variability , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[37]  Luc Proteau,et al.  Evidence for Continuous Processing of Visual Information in a Manual Video-Aiming Task , 2009, Journal of motor behavior.

[38]  L. Proteau,et al.  Developmental aspects of pluriarticular movement control , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[39]  Julien Brière,et al.  Automatic movement error detection and correction processes in reaching movements , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[40]  Luc Proteau,et al.  Suboptimal online control of aiming movements in virtual contexts , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.