Behavioral and near-infrared spectroscopy study of the effects of distance and choice in a number comparison task

Extensive behavioral and neurophysiological numerical comparison studies have shown that response times are longer and parietal activities are stronger when the numerical distance between two digits is smaller (the distance effect). However, only a few behavioral studies have considered the effect of the choice of larger or smaller numerals in numerical comparisons. Using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), we investigated the neural basis of choosing larger/smaller numerals in number comparison tasks in which subjects were required to choose a larger or smaller digit. Our results showed that choosing a smaller digit induced significantly longer response times (the choice effect) and stronger parietal activities. We also obtained significantly longer response times as the distance effect in accordance with previous works. However, NIRS data did not show any significant difference corresponding to distance effect. Our results and previous studies suggest that the parietal cortex is involved not only in measuring numerical quantities, but also in choosing a numerically larger/smaller quantity among the categories of choice. Potentials and limitations of NIRS were discussed.

[1]  David A. Boas,et al.  A Quantitative Comparison of Simultaneous BOLD fMRI and NIRS Recordings during Functional Brain Activation , 2002, NeuroImage.

[2]  E. Mayer,et al.  A pure case of Gerstmann syndrome with a subangular lesion. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[3]  Yushiro Yamashita,et al.  Prefrontal cerebral blood volume patterns while playing video games—A near-infrared spectroscopy study , 2006, Brain and Development.

[4]  Donald McEwen Johnson,et al.  Confidence and speed in the two-category judgment , 1939 .

[5]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Abstract representations of numbers in the animal and human brain , 1998, Trends in Neurosciences.

[6]  Yumiko Otsuka,et al.  Neural activation to upright and inverted faces in infants measured by near infrared spectroscopy , 2007, NeuroImage.

[7]  P. W. Mccormick,et al.  Intracerebral penetration of infrared light. Technical note. , 1992, Journal of neurosurgery.

[8]  Stefan Golaszewski,et al.  Neural correlates of distance and congruity effects in a numerical Stroop task: an event-related fMRI study , 2005, NeuroImage.

[9]  Masako Okamoto,et al.  Three-dimensional probabilistic anatomical cranio-cerebral correlation via the international 10–20 system oriented for transcranial functional brain mapping , 2004, NeuroImage.

[10]  M. Delazer,et al.  Arithmetic Facts without Meaning , 1997, Cortex.

[11]  T. Landis,et al.  Pure Global Acalculia Following a Left Subangular Lesion , 2003, Neurocase.

[12]  G. Orban,et al.  Parietal Representation of Symbolic and Nonsymbolic Magnitude , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  A. Paivio.  Perceptual comparisons through the mind’s eye , 1975, Memory & cognition.

[14]  William P. Banks,et al.  Encoding and Processing of Symbolic Information in Comparative Judgments1 , 1977 .

[15]  Masaki Kameyama,et al.  Sex and age dependencies of cerebral blood volume changes during cognitive activation: a multichannel near-infrared spectroscopy study , 2004, NeuroImage.

[16]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Event-related fMRI analysis of the cerebral circuit for number comparison. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[17]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  John M. Parkman,et al.  Temporal aspects of digit and letter inequality judgments. , 1971, Journal of Experimental Psychology.

[19]  Masako Okamoto,et al.  Multimodal assessment of cortical activation during apple peeling by NIRS and fMRI , 2004, NeuroImage.

[20]  Michael Andres,et al.  Hemispheric lateralization of number comparison. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[21]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Differential Contributions of the Left and Right Inferior Parietal Lobules to Number Processing , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[22]  A. Villringer,et al.  Non-invasive optical spectroscopy and imaging of human brain function , 1997, Trends in Neurosciences.

[23]  E. J. Carter,et al.  Functional Imaging of Numerical Processing in Adults and 4-y-Old Children , 2006, PLoS biology.

[24]  Carlo Miniussi,et al.  The differential involvement of inferior parietal lobule in number comparison: a rTMS study , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[25]  Archana K. Singh,et al.  Exploring the false discovery rate in multichannel NIRS , 2006, NeuroImage.

[26]  M. Tamura,et al.  Interpretation of near-infrared spectroscopy signals: a study with a newly developed perfused rat brain model. , 2001, Journal of applied physiology.

[27]  R. Moyer.  Comparing objects in memory: Evidence suggesting an internal psychophysics , 1973 .

[28]  ROBERT S. MOYER,et al.  Time required for Judgements of Numerical Inequality , 1967, Nature.

[29]  Klaus Willmes,et al.  On the functional role of human parietal cortex in number processing: How gender mediates the impact of a ‘virtual lesion’ induced by rTMS , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[30]  Yumiko Otsuka,et al.  When do infants differentiate profile face from frontal face? A near‐infrared spectroscopic study , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[31]  D. LeBihan,et al.  Modulation of Parietal Activation by Semantic Distance in a Number Comparison Task , 2001, NeuroImage.

[32]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Cerebral Pathways for Calculation: Double Dissociation between Rote Verbal and Quantitative Knowledge of Arithmetic , 1997, Cortex.

[33]  David J. Freedman,et al.  Representation of the Quantity of Visual Items in the Primate Prefrontal Cortex , 2002, Science.

[34]  Domenico Passafiume,et al.  Calculation Disturbances in Adults with Focal Hemispheric Damage , 1982, Cortex.

[35]  H S Terrace,et al.  Ordering of the numerosities 1 to 9 by monkeys. , 1998, Science.

[36]  Makoto Ito,et al.  Time courses of brain activation and their implications for function: A multichannel near-infrared spectroscopy study during finger tapping , 2007, Neuroscience Research.

[37]  P. Skudlarski,et al.  Quantity determination and the distance effect with letters, numbers, and shapes: a functional MR imaging study of number processing. , 2003, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[38]  Elizabeth M Brannon,et al.  Semantic congruity affects numerical judgments similarly in monkeys and humans. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  W. Banks,et al.  Semantic and perceptual processes in symbolic comparisons. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[40]  S Dehaene,et al.  The psychophysics of numerical comparison: A reexamination of apparently incompatible data , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[41]  Masaki Kameyama,et al.  Frontal lobe function in bipolar disorder: A multichannel near-infrared spectroscopy study , 2006, NeuroImage.

[42]  Andreas Nieder,et al.  A Labeled-Line Code for Small and Large Numerosities in the Monkey Prefrontal Cortex , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[43]  Kazuo Hiraki,et al.  Sustained decrease in oxygenated hemoglobin during video games in the dorsal prefrontal cortex: A NIRS study of children , 2006, NeuroImage.

[44]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Approximate quantities and exact number words: dissociable systems , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[45]  Philippe Pinel,et al.  Distributed and Overlapping Cerebral Representations of Number, Size, and Luminance during Comparative Judgments , 2004, Neuron.

[46]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Human Brain Activity Related to the Perception of Spatial Features of Objects , 1999, NeuroImage.

[47]  Avishai Henik,et al.  Are numbers special? The comparison systems of the human brain investigated by fMRI , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[48]  Andreas Nieder,et al.  A parieto-frontal network for visual numerical information in the monkey. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.