Understanding Policy Implementation Processes as Self-Organizing Systems

Abstract Implementation studies and related research in organizational theory can be enhanced by drawing on the field of complex systems to understand better and, as a consequence, more successfully manage change. This article reinterprets data previously published in the British Journal of Management to reveal a new contribution, that policy implementation processes should be understood as a self-organizing system in which adaptive abilities are extremely important for stakeholders. In other words, national policy is reinterpreted at the local level, with each local organization uniquely mixing elements of national policy with their own requirements making policy implementation unpredictable and more sketchy. The original article explained different paces and directions of change in terms of traditional management processes: leadership, politics, implementation and vision. By reinterpreting the data, it is possible to reveal that deeper level processes, which are more emergent, are also at work influencing change, which the authors label possibility space. Implications for theory, policy and practice are identified.

[1]  R. Parker,et al.  Communities and Local Government , 2008 .

[2]  M. West,et al.  Team-based organisations for competitive advantage , 2008 .

[3]  M. Butler Inquiring how a lecturer keeps learning about their teaching:a personal case history on reflective imagination , 2007 .

[4]  Catherine L. Wang,et al.  Dynamic Capabilities: A Review and Research Agenda , 2007 .

[5]  H. Wagenaar,et al.  Governance, Complexity, and Democratic Participation , 2007 .

[6]  J. Liddle,et al.  Service Domains – The New Communities: A Case Study of Peterlee Sure Start, UK , 2005 .

[7]  S. Dawson,et al.  New Public Management : A discussion with special reference to UK health , 2005 .

[8]  Donald MacLean,et al.  Complexity Theory and Strategic Change: An Empirically Informed Critique , 2005 .

[9]  Mark Exworthy,et al.  Big Windows and Little Windows: Implementation in the ‘Congested State’ , 2004 .

[10]  J. Schofield,et al.  Symposium on Implementing Public Policy: Learning from Theory and Practice , 2004 .

[11]  J. Schofield A Model of Learned Implementation , 2004 .

[12]  Bill McKelvey,et al.  "SIMPLE RULES" FOR IMPROVING CORPORATE IQ: BASIC LESSONS FROM COMPLEXITY SCIENCE , 2004 .

[13]  M. Butler Managing from the Inside Out: Drawing on ‘Receptivity’ to Explain Variation in Strategy Implementation , 2003 .

[14]  James Baldwin,et al.  Simulating the cladistic evolution of manufacturing , 2003 .

[15]  J. Kelly The Audit Commission: guiding, steering and regulating local government , 2003 .

[16]  Neil F. Johnson,et al.  The science of complexity , 2002 .

[17]  Ian Reid,et al.  Complexity science , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[18]  Peter M. Allen,et al.  A COMPLEX SYSTEMS APPROACH TO LEARNING IN ADAPTIVE NETWORKS , 2001 .

[19]  B. McKelvey ENERGISING ORDER-CREATING NETWORKS OF DISTRIBUTED INTELLIGENCE: IMPROVING THE CORPORATE BRAIN , 2001 .

[20]  Peter M. Allen,et al.  What Is Complexity Science? Knowledge of the Limits to Knowledge , 2001 .

[21]  S. Osborne Public-Private Partnerships: Theory and Practice in International Perspective , 2000 .

[22]  G. Vinten Public Management Reform. A Comparative Analysis , 2000 .

[23]  S. Maguire,et al.  Complexity and Management: Moving From Fad To Firm Foundations , 1999 .

[24]  Peter M. Allen,et al.  Evolving complexity in social science , 1998 .

[25]  P. Allen Cities and Regions as Self-Organizing Systems: Models of Complexity , 1997 .

[26]  S. G. Cohen,et al.  What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite , 1997 .

[27]  Patricia Shaw,et al.  Intervening in the shadow systems of organizations , 1997 .

[28]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  The Art of Continuous Change : Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations , 1997 .

[29]  C. Hood Contemporary public management: a new global paradigm? , 1995 .

[30]  C. Hood The “new public management” in the 1980s: Variations on a theme , 1995 .

[31]  Ann Taket,et al.  SHAPING STRATEGIC CHANGE - MAKING CHANGE IN LARGE ORGANIZATIONS - THE CASE OF THE NATIONAL-HEALTH-SERVICE - PETTIGREW,A, FERLIE,E, MCKEE,L , 1994 .

[32]  M. Jelinek Managing change for competitive success , 1993 .

[33]  J. Kooiman,et al.  Modern Governance: New Government-Society Interactions , 1993 .

[34]  A. Taket Shaping Strategic Change: Making Change in Large Organisations—The Case of The National Health Service , 1992 .

[35]  H. Maturana,et al.  The Tree of Knowledge: The Biological Roots of Human Understanding , 2007 .

[36]  John S. Dryzek,et al.  Discursive Democracy: Politics, Policy, and Political Science , 1992 .

[37]  C. Hood A PUBLIC MANAGEMENT FOR ALL SEASONS , 1991 .

[38]  Benny Hjern,et al.  Implementation Structures: A New Unit of Administrative Analysis , 1981 .

[39]  Bill McKelvey,et al.  Complexity Science and Organization Studies , 2006 .

[40]  James Baldwin,et al.  The implications of complexity for business process and strategy , 2005 .

[41]  Kurt A. Richardson,et al.  What is complexity science? A view from different directions , 2001 .

[42]  I. Mitroff,et al.  A Study of Spirituality in the Workplace , 1999 .

[43]  Ulrich Beck,et al.  World Risk Society , 1999 .

[44]  K. Ridgway,et al.  Building a manufacturing cladogram , 1997 .

[45]  Walter J.M. Kickert,et al.  Public Governance in the Netherlands: An Alternative to Anglo‐American ‘Managerialism’ , 1997 .

[46]  T. Hughes,et al.  Tales from Ovid , 1997 .

[47]  Andrew Pettigrew,et al.  The New Public Management in Action , 1996 .

[48]  R. Stacey The science of complexity: An alternative perspective for strategic change processes , 1995 .

[49]  A. Pettigrew Managing Change and Corporate Performance , 1992 .

[50]  HERBERT A. SIMON,et al.  The Architecture of Complexity , 1991 .