The Influence of Unequal Numbers of Trials on Comparisons of Average Event-Related Potentials

Four studies examined (a) how event-related potentials (ERPs) change as the number of trials averaged increases and (b) the statistical implications of comparing ERPs composed of different numbers of trials. Experiment 1 utilized data from 7-year-old children performing an oddball task. The other three experiments used simulated data with different distributions of P3 peak latency. In all 4 experiments, peak amplitude decreased and the mean amplitude of the 300 to 900 msec interval remained stable as the number of trials averaged increased. The standard deviations of both measures decreased. These data show that the decrease in peak amplitude with increasing numbers of trials that has been found in other studies is not solely due to the elimination of residual noise but is likely to also involve a fundamental aspect of signal averaging and the algorithm used to select peaks. Furthermore, these experiments expose the possibility of statistical errors when investigators compare average ERPs composed of small versus large numbers of trials as is often done when the oddball paradigm is used.

[1]  M. Lykins,et al.  Event-Related Potential Measures of 24-Hour Retention in 5-Month-Old Infants. , 1995 .

[2]  C. Nelson,et al.  Neural correlates of attention and memory in the first year of life , 1992 .

[3]  J. Polich,et al.  P300 development from auditory stimuli. , 1986, Psychophysiology.

[4]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Endogenous brain potentials associated with selective auditory attention. , 1980, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[5]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[6]  E Gordon,et al.  Is the target-to-target interval a critical determinant of P3 amplitude? , 1999, Psychophysiology.

[7]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  Attention and selection in the growing child: views derived from developmental psychophysiology , 2000, Biological Psychology.

[8]  David G. Thomas,et al.  Single-Trial Analyses of Developmental Trends in Infant Auditory Event-Related Potentials , 1999 .

[9]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[10]  D. Regan.  Human brain electrophysiology: Evoked potentials and evoked magnetic fields in science and medicine , 1989 .

[11]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  ERPs to orthographic, phonological, and semantic tasks in dyslexic children with auditory processing impairment , 1999 .

[12]  K. Eklund,et al.  Brain Responses to Changes in Speech Sound Durations Differ Between Infants With and Without Familial Risk for Dyslexia , 2002, Developmental neuropsychology.

[13]  J. Cohen,et al.  On the number of trials needed for P300. , 1997, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[14]  P300 sequence effects differ between children and adults for auditory stimuli. , 1999, Psychophysiology.

[15]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: recording standards and publication criteria. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[16]  M. Coles,et al.  Event-related brain potentials: An introduction. , 1995 .

[17]  H. Jasper,et al.  The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation. The International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. , 1999, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[18]  N W Perry,et al.  Signal versus noise in the evoked potential. , 1966, Science.

[19]  J. H. Karrer,et al.  Event-related brain potentials during an extended visual recognition memory task depict delayed development of cerebral inhibitory processes among 6-month-old infants with Down syndrome. , 1998, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[20]  P Salapatek,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of infant recognition memory. , 1986, Child development.

[21]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Electric Brain Responses Obtained From Newborn Infants to Changes in Duration in Complex Harmonic Tones , 2002, Developmental neuropsychology.

[22]  D. Friedman,et al.  An ERP developmental study of repetition priming by auditory novel stimuli. , 1996, Psychophysiology.

[23]  R. Karrer,et al.  Event-related potentials and information processing in infants with and without Down syndrome. , 1995, American journal of mental retardation : AJMR.

[24]  K. M. Kleinman,et al.  A single channel method for recording vertical and lateral eye movements. , 1978, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[25]  C. Nelson,et al.  Neural correlates of cross-modal recognition memory by 8-month-old human infants , 1993 .

[26]  D Friedman,et al.  Effects of aging on the novelty P3 during attend and ignore oddball tasks. , 1998, Psychophysiology.

[27]  C. Nelson,et al.  Brain activity differentiates face and object processing in 6-month-old infants. , 1999, Developmental psychology.

[28]  H Begleiter,et al.  P300 hemispheric amplitude asymmetries from a visual oddball task. , 1995, Psychophysiology.