Functional trade-offs increase species diversity in experimental plant communities.

Functional trade-offs have long been recognised as important mechanisms of species coexistence, but direct experimental evidence for such mechanisms is extremely rare. Here, we test the effect of one classical trade-off - a negative correlation between seed size and seed number - by establishing microcosm plant communities with positive, negative and no correlation between seed size and seed number and analysing the effect of the seed size/number correlation on species richness. Consistent with theory, a negative correlation between seed size and seed number led to a higher number of species in the communities and a corresponding wider range of seed size (a measure of functional richness) by promoting coexistence of large- and small-seeded species. Our study provides the first direct evidence that a seed size/number trade-off may contribute to species coexistence, and at a wider context, demonstrates the potential role of functional trade-offs in maintaining species diversity.

[1]  M. Pärtel,et al.  Plant species richness: the world records , 2012 .

[2]  S. Hubbell,et al.  The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography at age ten. , 2011, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[3]  J. Koricheva,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Predation Risk Effects on Pollinator Behaviour , 2011, PloS one.

[4]  Dominique Gravel,et al.  Persistence Increases with Diversity and Connectance in Trophic Metacommunities , 2011, PloS one.

[5]  K. Harms,et al.  Seed arrival and ecological filters interact to assemble high-diversity plant communities. , 2011, Ecology.

[6]  T. L. Dickson,et al.  Seed availability constrains plant species sorting along a soil fertility gradient , 2010 .

[7]  H. Muller‐Landau.  The tolerance–fecundity trade-off and the maintenance of diversity in seed size , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  A. Manica,et al.  Stochastic and deterministic processes jointly structure tropical arthropod communities. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[9]  Lindsay A. Turnbull,et al.  Why equalising trade-offs aren't always neutral. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[10]  D. Mouillot,et al.  New multidimensional functional diversity indices for a multifaceted framework in functional ecology. , 2008, Ecology.

[11]  F. Jeltsch,et al.  Assessing the importance of seed immigration on coexistence of plant functional types in a species-rich ecosystem , 2008 .

[12]  Omri Allouche,et al.  Integrating the Effects of Area, Isolation, and Habitat Heterogeneity on Species Diversity: A Unification of Island Biogeography and Niche Theory , 2007, The American Naturalist.

[13]  Peter B Adler,et al.  A niche for neutrality. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[14]  P. David,et al.  Coexistence in a metacommunity: the competition-colonization trade-off is not dead. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[15]  Mark Westoby,et al.  Land-plant ecology on the basis of functional traits. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[16]  Dominique Gravel,et al.  Reconciling niche and neutrality: the continuum hypothesis. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[17]  Lindsay A. Turnbull,et al.  Niches, rather than neutrality, structure a grassland pioneer guild , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[18]  O. Eriksson.  Game theory provides no explanation for seed size variation in grasslands , 2005, Oecologia.

[19]  Jonathan Silvertown,et al.  Plant coexistence and the niche , 2004 .

[20]  M. Westoby,et al.  What do seedlings die from and what are the implications for evolution of seed size , 2004 .

[21]  M. Westoby,et al.  Seedling survival and seed size: a synthesis of the literature , 2004 .

[22]  J. P. Grime,et al.  The plant traits that drive ecosystems: Evidence from three continents , 2004 .

[23]  O. Eriksson,et al.  Trade-offs between dispersal and competitive ability: a comparative study of wind-dispersed Asteraceae forbs , 2003, Evolutionary Ecology.

[24]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  Trade‐offs in community ecology: linking spatial scales and species coexistence , 2004 .

[25]  P. Amarasekare.  Competitive coexistence in spatially structured environments: a synthesis , 2003 .

[26]  D. Coomes,et al.  Colonization, tolerance, competition and seed-size variation within functional groups , 2003 .

[27]  M. Westoby,et al.  Seed addition experiments are more likely to increase recruitment in larger‐seeded species , 2002 .

[28]  M. Rees,et al.  Coexistence and Relative Abundance in Annual Plant Assemblages: The Roles of Competition and Colonization , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[29]  S. Hubbell,et al.  Seed size, growth rate and gap microsite conditions as determinants of recruitment success for pioneer species , 2002 .

[30]  Michelle R. Leishman,et al.  The relationship between seed size and abundance in plant communities: model predictions and observed patterns , 2001 .

[31]  M. Leishman.  Does the seed size/number trade‐off model determine plant community structure? An assessment of the model mechanisms and their generality , 2001 .

[32]  Frederick R. Adler,et al.  IS SPACE NECESSARY? INTERFERENCE COMPETITION AND LIMITS TO BIODIVERSITY , 2000 .

[33]  P. Chesson.  Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species Diversity , 2000 .

[34]  James H. Brown,et al.  CONSTRAINTS OF SEED SIZE ON PLANT DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE , 2000 .

[35]  O. Eriksson,et al.  A comparative study of seed number, seed size, seedling size and recruitment in grassland plants , 2000 .

[36]  Lindsay A. Turnbull,et al.  Seed mass and the competition/colonization trade‐off: a sowing experiment , 1999 .

[37]  J. Metz,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics of seed size and seedling competitive ability. , 1999, Theoretical population biology.

[38]  O. Eriksson,et al.  Abundance, distribution and life histories of grassland plants: a comparative study of 81 species , 1998 .

[39]  M. Westoby,et al.  Game-Theoretical Evolution of Seed Mass in Multi-Species Ecological Models , 1997 .

[40]  M. Westoby,et al.  Seedling longevity under deep shade in relation to seed size , 1996 .

[41]  Mark Rees,et al.  Quantifying the Impact of Competition and Spatial Heterogeneity on the Structure and Dynamics of a Four-Species Guild of Winter Annuals , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[42]  S. Geritz.  Evolutionarily Stable Seed Polymorphism and Small-Scale Spatial Variation in Seedling Density , 1995, The American Naturalist.

[43]  M. Rees.  Community Structure in Sand Dune Annuals: Is Seed Weight a Key Quantity? , 1995 .

[44]  M. Westoby,et al.  Correlates of seed size variation: A comparison among five temperate floras , 1995 .

[45]  D. Tilman.  Competition and Biodiversity in Spatially Structured Habitats , 1994 .

[46]  M. Westoby,et al.  Comparative evolutionary ecology of seed size. , 1992, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[47]  S. Stearns.  Trade-offs in life-history evolution , 1989 .

[48]  Robert K. Colwell,et al.  Experimental Studies of the Niche , 1975 .

[49]  Christopher C. Smith,et al.  The Optimal Balance between Size and Number of Offspring , 1974, The American Naturalist.