The Membrane Protein LeuT in Micellar Systems: Aggregation Dynamics and Detergent Binding to the S2 Site

Structural and functional properties of integral membrane proteins are often studied in detergent micellar environments (proteomicelles), but how such proteomicelles form and organize is not well understood. This makes it difficult to evaluate the relationship between the properties of the proteins measured in such a detergent-solubilized form and under native conditions. To obtain mechanistic information about this relationship for the leucine transporter (LeuT), a prokaryotic homologue of the mammalian neurotransmitter/sodium symporters (NSSs), we studied the properties of proteomicelles formed by n-dodecyl-β,d-maltopyranoside (DDM) detergent. Extensive atomistic molecular dynamics simulations of different protein/detergent/water number ratios revealed the formation of a proteomicelle characterized by a constant-sized shell of detergents surrounding LeuT protecting its transmembrane segments from unfavorable hydrophobic/hydrophilic exposure. Regardless of the DDM content in the simulated system, this shell consisted of a constant number of DDM molecules (∼120 measured at a 4 Å cutoff distance from LeuT). In contrast, the overall number of DDMs in the proteomicelle (aggregation number) was found to depend on the detergent concentration, reaching a saturation value of 226±17 DDMs in the highest concentration regime simulated. Remarkably, we found that at high detergent-to-protein ratios we observed two independent ways of DDM penetration into LeuT, both leading to a positioning of the DDM molecule in the second substrate (S2) binding site of LeuT. Consonant with several recent experimental studies demonstrating changes in functional properties of membrane proteins due to detergent, our findings highlight how the environment in which the membrane proteins are examined may affect the outcome and interpretation of their mechanistic features.

[1]  Andreas Engel,et al.  A novel method for detergent concentration determination. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[2]  C. Dart SYMPOSIUM REVIEW: Lipid microdomains and the regulation of ion channel function , 2010, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  Eric Gouaux,et al.  A Competitive Inhibitor Traps LeuT in an Open-to-Out Conformation , 2008, Science.

[4]  Timothy S. Carpenter,et al.  OmpA: gating and dynamics via molecular dynamics simulations. , 2008, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[5]  R. Rosenfeld Nature , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[6]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  Molecular simulations of dodecyl-β-maltoside micelles in water: influence of the headgroup conformation and force field parameters. , 2011, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[7]  Irina S. Moreira,et al.  Allosteric communication between protomers of dopamine Class A GPCR dimers modulates activation , 2009, Nature chemical biology.

[8]  Jonathan A. Javitch,et al.  Binding of an octylglucoside detergent molecule in the second substrate (S2) site of LeuT establishes an inhibitor-bound conformation , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Jonathan A. Javitch,et al.  Experimental conditions can obscure the second high-affinity site in LeuT , 2011, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[10]  Substrate binds in the S1 site of the F253A mutant of LeuT, a neurotransmitter sodium symporter homologue , 2012, EMBO reports.

[11]  M. Sansom,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations of GlpF in a micelle vs in a bilayer: conformational dynamics of a membrane protein as a function of environment. , 2005, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[12]  Kai Simons,et al.  Lipid Rafts As a Membrane-Organizing Principle , 2010, Science.

[13]  George Khelashvili,et al.  Ligand-Dependent Conformations and Dynamics of the Serotonin 5-HT2A Receptor Determine Its Activation and Membrane-Driven Oligomerization Properties , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[14]  W. Xu,et al.  Cholesterol reduction by methyl-beta-cyclodextrin attenuates the delta opioid receptor-mediated signaling in neuronal cells but enhances it in non-neuronal cells. , 2007, Biochemical pharmacology.

[15]  M. Sansom,et al.  MD simulations of Mistic: conformational stability in detergent micelles and water. , 2006, Biochemistry.

[16]  Syma Khalid,et al.  Coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations of membrane proteins and peptides. , 2007, Journal of structural biology.

[17]  H. Weinstein,et al.  The Substrate-Driven Transition to an Inward-Facing Conformation in the Functional Mechanism of the Dopamine Transporter , 2011, PloS one.

[18]  A. Schousboe,et al.  Neurotransmitter transporters: molecular function of important drug targets. , 2006, Trends in pharmacological sciences.

[19]  M. Sansom,et al.  Membrane protein dynamics versus environment: simulations of OmpA in a micelle and in a bilayer. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[20]  Michel Bouvier,et al.  Cholesterol-dependent separation of the beta2-adrenergic receptor from its partners determines signaling efficacy: insight into nanoscale organization of signal transduction. , 2008, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[21]  Laxmikant V. Kalé,et al.  Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[22]  M. Sansom,et al.  Simulation studies of the interactions between membrane proteins and detergents. , 2005, Biochemical Society transactions.

[23]  T. Blundell,et al.  Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[24]  Paul Curnow,et al.  Membrane proteins, lipids and detergents: not just a soap opera. , 2004, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[25]  P. Chong,et al.  Localization of the κ Opioid Receptor in Lipid Rafts , 2006, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

[26]  F. Hanisch,et al.  Lipid rafts: signaling and sorting platforms of cells and their roles in cancer , 2011, Expert review of proteomics.

[27]  F. Young Biochemistry , 1955, The Indian Medical Gazette.

[28]  J. Møller,et al.  Interaction of membrane proteins and lipids with solubilizing detergents. , 2000, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[29]  M. Kozlov,et al.  Phase boundaries in mixtures of membrane-forming amphiphiles and micelle-forming amphiphiles. , 2000, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[30]  Georg Weiglein Particle physics: From the top... , 2004, Nature.

[31]  Harini Krishnamurthy,et al.  X-ray structures of LeuT in substrate-free outward-open and apo inward-open states , 2012, Nature.

[32]  E. Ikonen,et al.  Functional rafts in cell membranes , 1997, Nature.

[33]  Harel Weinstein,et al.  Ion-controlled conformational dynamics in the outward-open transition from an occluded state of LeuT. , 2012, Biophysical journal.

[34]  Eric Gouaux,et al.  Insights into transport mechanism from LeuT engineered to transport tryptophan , 2012, The EMBO journal.

[35]  J. Rothman,et al.  Erratum: A lateralized brain network for visuospatial attention , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[36]  T. McIntosh,et al.  Roles of bilayer material properties in function and distribution of membrane proteins. , 2006, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[37]  Eric Gouaux,et al.  Antidepressant binding site in a bacterial homologue of neurotransmitter transporters , 2007, Nature.

[38]  George Khelashvili,et al.  Quantitative modeling of membrane deformations by multihelical membrane proteins: application to G-protein coupled receptors. , 2011, Biophysical journal.

[39]  Olaf S Andersen,et al.  Bilayer thickness and membrane protein function: an energetic perspective. , 2007, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[40]  Harel Weinstein,et al.  The mechanism of a neurotransmitter:sodium symporter--inward release of Na+ and substrate is triggered by substrate in a second binding site. , 2008, Molecular cell.

[41]  J. F. Hinton,et al.  Gramicidin A backbone and side chain dynamics evaluated by molecular dynamics simulations and nuclear magnetic resonance experiments. I: molecular dynamics simulations. , 2011, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[42]  V. Levi,et al.  A Two-Stage Model for Lipid Modulation of the Activity of Integral Membrane Proteins , 2012, PloS one.

[43]  K. Boesze-Battaglia,et al.  Cholesterol heterogeneity in bovine rod outer segment disk membranes. , 1989, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[44]  T. Darden,et al.  A smooth particle mesh Ewald method , 1995 .

[45]  D. Marsh,et al.  Protein modulation of lipids, and vice-versa, in membranes. , 2008, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[46]  Jianpeng Ma,et al.  CHARMM: The biomolecular simulation program , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..

[47]  David van der Spoel,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations of a membrane protein-micelle complex in vacuo. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[48]  Giovanni M Pavan,et al.  Validation of a novel molecular dynamics simulation approach for lipophilic drug incorporation into polymer micelles. , 2012, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[49]  E. Gouaux,et al.  Structures of LeuT in bicelles define conformation and substrate binding in a membrane-like context , 2012, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[50]  Peter J Bond,et al.  MD simulations of spontaneous membrane protein/detergent micelle formation. , 2004, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[51]  P. Tummino,et al.  Determination of the aggregation number of detergent micelles using steady-state fluorescence quenching. , 1993, Biophysical journal.