An adaptive inverse-distance weighting spatial interpolation technique

One of the most frequently used deterministic models in spatial interpolation is the inverse-distance weighting (IDW) method. It is relatively fast and easy to compute, and straightforward to interpret. Its general idea is based on the assumption that the attribute value of an unsampled point is the weighted average of known values within the neighborhood, and the weights are inversely related to the distances between the prediction location and the sampled locations. The inverse-distance weight is modified by a constant power or a distance-decay parameter to adjust the diminishing strength in relationship with increasing distance. Recognizing the potential of varying distance-decay relationships over the study area, we suggest that the value of the weighting parameter be allowed to vary according to the spatial pattern of the sampled points in the neighborhood. This adaptive approach suggests that the distance-decay parameter can be a function of the point pattern of the neighborhood. We developed an algorithm to search for ''optimal'' adaptive distance-decay parameters. Using cross validation to evaluate the results, we conclude that adaptive IDW performs better than the constant parameter method in most cases, and better than ordinary kriging in one of our empirical studies when the spatial structure in the data could not be modeled effectively by typical variogram functions.

[1]  Ashok N. Srivastava,et al.  Data Mining: Concepts, Models, Methods, and Algorithms , 2005, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[2]  Arthur Getis,et al.  Point pattern analysis , 1985 .

[3]  Zekai Şen,et al.  Spatial interpolation and estimation of solar irradiation by cumulative semivariograms , 2001 .

[4]  M. Tomczak,et al.  Spatial Interpolation and its Uncertainty Using Automated Anisotropic Inverse Distance Weighting (IDW) - Cross-Validation/Jackknife Approach , 1998 .

[5]  S. Barnes,et al.  A Technique for Maximizing Details in Numerical Weather Map Analysis , 1964 .

[6]  G. P. Cressman AN OPERATIONAL OBJECTIVE ANALYSIS SYSTEM , 1959 .

[7]  Timothy C. Coburn,et al.  Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation , 2000, Technometrics.

[8]  Morton E. O'Kelly,et al.  Spatial Interaction Models:Formulations and Applications , 1988 .

[9]  D. Weber,et al.  Evaluation and comparison of spatial interpolators II , 1992 .

[10]  Trevor C. Bailey,et al.  Interactive Spatial Data Analysis , 1995 .

[11]  W. Tobler A Computer Movie Simulating Urban Growth in the Detroit Region , 1970 .

[12]  Richard E. Zartman,et al.  Exploring spatial dependence of cotton yield using global and local autocorrelation statistics , 2004 .

[13]  Robert G. Downer,et al.  COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF SPATIAL PREDICTION METHODS IN A FIELD EXPERIMENT FOR MAPPING SOIL POTASSIUM , 2003 .

[14]  I. Bracken,et al.  The Generation of Spatial Population Distributions from Census Centroid Data , 1989, Environment & planning A.

[15]  P. Burrough,et al.  Principles of geographical information systems , 1998 .

[16]  A. Russell,et al.  Temporal and spatial distributions of ozone in Atlanta: regulatory and epidemiologic implications. , 1998, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[17]  L. S. Gandin,et al.  The planning of meteorological station networks , 1970 .

[18]  C. Lloyd Assessing the effect of integrating elevation data into the estimation of monthly precipitation in Great Britain , 2005 .

[19]  Mehmed Kantardzic,et al.  Data Mining: Concepts, Models, Methods, and Algorithms , 2002 .

[20]  E. Ziegel,et al.  geoENV VII: Geostatistics for Environmental Applications , 1997 .

[21]  V. Singh,et al.  Fuzzy logic algorithm for runoff-induced sediment transport from bare soil surfaces , 2003 .

[22]  Peter Guttorp,et al.  Advances in Modeling and Inference for Environmental Processes with Nonstationary Spatial Covariance , 2001 .

[23]  A. Getis The Analysis of Spatial Association by Use of Distance Statistics , 2010 .

[24]  M. Goodchild,et al.  Geographic Information Systems and Science (second edition) , 2001 .

[25]  Amy J. Ruggles,et al.  An Experimental Comparison of Ordinary and Universal Kriging and Inverse Distance Weighting , 1999 .

[26]  P. Goovaerts Geostatistical approaches for incorporating elevation into the spatial interpolation of rainfall , 2000 .

[27]  Michael Edward Hohn,et al.  An Introduction to Applied Geostatistics: by Edward H. Isaaks and R. Mohan Srivastava, 1989, Oxford University Press, New York, 561 p., ISBN 0-19-505012-6, ISBN 0-19-505013-4 (paperback), $55.00 cloth, $35.00 paper (US) , 1991 .

[28]  Gokmen Tayfur,et al.  FUZZY LOGIC MODEL FOR THE PREDICTION OF CEMENT COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH , 2004 .

[29]  Peter M. Atkinson,et al.  Spatial prediction and surface modeling , 2005 .

[30]  Katherine Campbell,et al.  Introduction to disjunctive kriging and non-linear geostatistics , 1994 .

[31]  A. Stewart Fotheringham,et al.  Trends in quantitative methods I: stressing the local , 1997 .