Application of neural networks to model the signal-dependent noise of a digital breast tomosynthesis unit

This work presents a practical method for estimating the spatially-varying gain of the signal-dependent portion of the noise from a digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) system. A number of image processing algorithms require previous knowledge of the noise properties of a DBT unit. However, this information is not easily available and thus must be estimated. The estimation of such parameters requires a large number of calibration images, as it often changes with acquisition angle, spatial position and radiographic factors. This could represent a barrier in the algorithm’s deployment, mainly for clinical applications. Thus, we modeled the gain of the Poisson noise of a commercially available DBT unit as a function of the radiographic factors, acquisition angle, and pixel position. First, we measured the noise parameters of a clinical DBT unit by acquiring 36 sets of calibration images (raw projections) using uniform phantoms of different thicknesses, within a range of radiographic factors commonly used in clinical practice. With this information, we trained a multilayer perceptron artificial neural network (MLP-ANN) to predict the gain of the Poisson noise automatically as a function of the acquisition setup. Furthermore, we varied the number of calibration images in the learning step of the MLP-ANN to determine the minimum number of images necessary to obtain an accurate model. Results show that the MLP-ANN was able to yield the desired parameters with average error of less than 2%, using a learning dataset limited to only seven sets of calibration images. The accuracy of the model, along with its computational efficiency, makes this method an attractive tool for clinical image-based applications.

[1]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Method for Simulating Dose Reduction in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  I. Sechopoulos A review of breast tomosynthesis. Part I. The image acquisition process. , 2013, Medical physics.

[3]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Method for simulating dose reduction in digital mammography using the Anscombe transformation , 2016, Medical physics.

[4]  E. Pisano,et al.  American College of Radiology Imaging Network , 2002 .

[5]  Karen O. Egiazarian,et al.  Practical Poissonian-Gaussian Noise Modeling and Fitting for Single-Image Raw-Data , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[6]  Isaac N. Bankman,et al.  Handbook of medical imaging , 2000 .

[7]  Ivan Nunes da Silva,et al.  Artificial Neural Networks: A Practical Course , 2016 .

[8]  Kyle J. Myers,et al.  Virtual Tools for the Evaluation of Breast Imaging: State-of-the Science and Future Directions , 2016, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[9]  Fulwood House,et al.  Calculation Of Quantitative Image Quality Parameters , 2009 .

[10]  J.S. Lee,et al.  Noise Modeling and Estimation of Remotely-Sensed Images , 1989, 12th Canadian Symposium on Remote Sensing Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium,.

[11]  Marco Diani,et al.  Signal-Dependent Noise Modeling and Model Parameter Estimation in Hyperspectral Images , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[12]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Pipeline for effective denoising of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis , 2017, Medical Imaging.

[13]  Anne Marie McCarthy,et al.  Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography compared to digital mammography alone: a cohort study within the PROSPR consortium , 2016, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.