Toward an actualization of social intelligence in human and robot collaborative systems

As robot technology is evolving and creating a social community between humans and robots, it is necessary to research and develop a new type of intelligence, which we refer to as "social intelligence''. Social intelligence enables natural and socially appropriate interactions. Its importance is gaining a growing interest among not just the human-computer interaction researchers but also robot technology researchers and developers. This article discusses the definition, importance, and benefits of social intelligence in human and robot collaborative systems. The virtual social environment is employed to implement an experimental social intelligence system because of its low cost and high flexibility. Software robots (i.e. agents) with the social intelligence model have been implemented by featuring an emotion model and a personality model under the virtual environment. The social intelligence model that handles affective responses is based on the theories of personality, emotion, and human-media interaction such as cognitive appraisal theory and media equation. The experiment was conducted with the virtual learning collaborative system to examine the effect of the social intelligence model in the collaborative system. The data showed that the users had more positive impressions about the usefulness and the application and learning experience when the cooperative agent displayed some social responses with personality and emotions. It should be noted here that the cooperative agent did not provide any explicit assistance for the human user such as giving clues and showing answers, and yet the user's evaluation on the usefulness of the learning system was influenced by the social agent. The data also suggested that the cooperative agent contributed to the effectiveness of the learning system.

[1]  Andrew Ortony,et al.  The Cognitive Structure of Emotions , 1988 .

[2]  Clifford Nass,et al.  The media equation - how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places , 1996 .

[3]  H. Dreyfus What Computers Can't Do: The Limits of Artificial Intelligence , 1978 .

[4]  P. Ekman An argument for basic emotions , 1992 .

[5]  Hiroaki Kitano,et al.  Realizing personality in audio-visually triggered non-verbal behaviors , 2003, 2003 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.03CH37422).

[6]  M. Minsky The Society of Mind , 1986 .

[7]  Brian R. Duffy,et al.  Anthropomorphism and the social robot , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[8]  Eduardo Alonso,et al.  AI and Agents: State of the Art , 2002, AI Mag..

[9]  W. James,et al.  The Principles of Psychology. , 1983 .

[10]  C.D. Martin,et al.  The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television and New Media Like Real People and Places [Book Review] , 1997, IEEE Spectrum.

[11]  D. Dennett Kinds Of Minds , 1996 .

[12]  Channel Four,et al.  ‘The Inner Eye’ , 2021, Satyajit Ray: The Inner Eye.

[13]  Dave Moffat,et al.  Personality Parameters and Programs , 1997, Creating Personalities for Synthetic Actors.

[14]  Ieee Robotics Proceedings, 2002 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, September 30-October 4, EPFL Lausanne, Switzerland , 2002 .

[15]  Hiroshi Nakajima,et al.  Emotion Model for Life-Like Agent and Its Evaluation , 1998, AAAI/IAAI.

[16]  Atsuo Takanishi,et al.  Robot personality based on the equations of emotion defined in the 3D mental space , 2001, Proceedings 2001 ICRA. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.01CH37164).

[17]  Mario Paolucci,et al.  Intelligent Social Learning , 2001, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..