Designing a graphical interface for creativity support tools for designers: a case study

This study proposes a co-designing, an iterative methodology to design graphical user interface for creativity support tools for designers. Given the high level of expectation from designers, the interface quality was one of the most challenging aspects of the work, in conjunction with the utility of the functionalities. An iterative design and evaluation process was used to create the icon-based interface, during which the needs of the designers and the functionalities of the system were integrated until a complete operational prototype emerged. This process provided three sequential prototypes. In order to achieve this, we derived qualitative and quantitative results from various methods: creative sessions, semantic and emotional evaluations, questionnaires, semi-directive interviews, subjective performance assessments, longitudinal tests, and focus group assessments. Finally, our iterative design and evaluation process can be considered to be a very efficient means of integrating end users' spontaneous feedback about icon redesigns in the early phases of development. The design outcome enabled the end users to ensure that key features of the creativity support tool were both usable and appealing.

[1]  J. Gero,et al.  The impact of working memory limitations on the design process during conceptualization , 2007 .

[2]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Design Principles for Tools to Support Creative Thinking , 2005 .

[3]  Steve J. Westerman,et al.  Inspiration, images and design: an investigation of designers' information gathering strategies , 2008 .

[4]  Manlai You,et al.  A Usability Evaluation of Web Map Zoom and Pan Functions , 2022 .

[5]  Nuno Jardim Nunes,et al.  Towards useful and usable interaction design tools: CanonSketch , 2007, Interact. Comput..

[6]  Marc Hassenzahl,et al.  User experience - a research agenda , 2006, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[7]  Gert Pasman,et al.  Designing with precedents , 2003 .

[8]  William K. Horton,et al.  The Icon Book: Visual Symbols for Computer Systems and Documentation , 1994 .

[9]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction , 1998 .

[10]  P. Jordan,et al.  Pleasure With Products : Beyond Usability , 2002 .

[11]  N. Tractinsky,et al.  What is beautiful is usable , 2000, Interact. Comput..

[12]  A. I. Keller,et al.  For Inspiration Only; Designer interaction with informal collections of visual material , 2005 .

[13]  Pieter Jan Stappers,et al.  Co-creation and the new landscapes of design , 2008 .

[14]  Klaus R. Scherer,et al.  Facets of Emotion : Recent Research , 2013 .

[15]  Thomas G. Dietterich,et al.  A model of the mechanical design process based on empirical data , 1988, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[16]  Carole Bouchard,et al.  A European emotional investigation in the field of shoe design. , 2009 .

[17]  Patrick W. Jordan Pleasure with products , 2001 .

[18]  Shumin Zhai,et al.  From Icons to Interface Models: Designing Hypermedia from the Bottom Up , 1993, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[19]  Ronald A. Finke,et al.  Creative Imagery: Discoveries and inventions in Visualization , 1990 .

[20]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Interface metaphors and user interface design , 1988 .

[21]  Noam Tractinsky,et al.  Assessing dimensions of perceived visual aesthetics of web sites , 2004 .

[22]  Rungtai Lin,et al.  A study of visual features for icon design , 1994 .

[23]  Carole Bouchard,et al.  TRENDS: a content-based information retrieval system for designers , 2010, SIGGRAPH '10.

[24]  Carole Bouchard,et al.  Iterative process of design and evaluation of icons for interactive TV menu , 2006, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[25]  Ming-Hui Huang,et al.  Web performance scale , 2005, Inf. Manag..

[26]  T. Landauer,et al.  Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction , 1997 .

[27]  Kumiyo Nakakoji Special Issue on "Computational Approaches for Early Stages of Design" , 2005, Knowl. Based Syst..

[28]  Fabrice Mantelet,et al.  Prise en compte de la perception émotionnelle du consommateur dans le processus de conception de produits , 2006 .

[29]  Gabriela Goldschmidt,et al.  On visual design thinking: the vis kids of architecture , 1994 .

[30]  Tom Dayton,et al.  Participatory Practices in the Software Lifecycle , 1997 .

[31]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Usability engineering , 1997, The Computer Science and Engineering Handbook.

[32]  Peter P. Chen Toward a methodology of graphical icon design , 2003, Fifth International Symposium on Multimedia Software Engineering, 2003. Proceedings..

[33]  Martin Bichler,et al.  Design science in information systems research , 2006, Wirtschaftsinf..

[34]  Nathalie Bonnardel,et al.  The Impact of Technology on Creativity in Design: An Enhancement? , 2010 .

[35]  Andreas Sonderegger,et al.  The influence of prototype fidelity and aesthetics of design in usability tests: effects on user behaviour, subjective evaluation and emotion. , 2009, Applied ergonomics.

[36]  Scott Curland Chase,et al.  Transforming shape in design: observations from studies of sketching , 2009 .

[37]  Claus Bossen,et al.  User gains and PD aims: assessment from a participatory design project , 2010, PDC '10.

[38]  J. Huisman The Netherlands , 1996, The Lancet.

[39]  Gabriela Goldschmidt,et al.  Variances in the impact of visual stimuli on design problem solving performance , 2006 .

[40]  Stefano Passini,et al.  Icon-function relationship in toolbar icons , 2008, Displays.

[41]  Shih-miao Huang,et al.  Factors affecting the design of computer icons , 2002 .

[42]  Andrew Dillon,et al.  Beyond usability: process, outcome and affect in human-computer interactions , 2001 .

[43]  John Restrepo Information Processing in Design , 2004 .

[44]  Michael Burmester,et al.  Hedonic and ergonomic quality aspects determine a software's appeal , 2000, CHI.